• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

November Stundie Nominations

From a discussion about the paparazzi stalking of author J.K. Rowling's children; apparently fictional characters deserve their privacy too?
duke1956 said:
"A child, no matter who their parents are, deserves privacy. ... It's a fairly black-and-white issue,"

Except for the fictional Harry Potter, whose life is exposed in pain staking detail. Hmm, I'm getting conflicting messages.
 
Yet again the Greatest Apollo Historian The World Has Ever Known displays his amazing ignorance of the most simple facts about spacecraft, namely, that spacecraft have small thrusters for attitude and translation control.

According to Patrick you have one and only one attempt at docking and docking all depends on how accurately you know your position before liftoff because you can't maneuver your spacecraft after the engine shuts down, and if you miss you can't maneuver to try again.

If they were out of plane 50 feet, it is infinitely too far. If off by 10 feet, it is a miss of infinite inaccuracy. If the docking attempt is a 10 foot miss, that is as bad as a 10,000 foot miss. A miss is a miss and I have caught them in a big fat lie confirming a miss.
 
Yet again the Greatest Apollo Historian The World Has Ever Known displays his amazing ignorance of the most simple facts about spacecraft, namely, that spacecraft have small thrusters for attitude and translation control.

If only PEOPLE had thrusters for attitude and translation. A thrusted fist is tempted but ineffective.
 
Robert Prey said:
So your really believe this ridiculously, needlessly, convoluted plan conspiracy theorists have concoted is actually plausible? That they would set up a patsy in one location and shoot Kennedy from a completely different one thus requiring endless readaction and editing of evidence and creating a massive potential failure point?

All any plotter has to do to cover their tracks is make sure the fatal bullet is fired at least roughly from the same trajectory as Oswald would have shot from but no, in CT land they instead concoct a plan out of the worst hack thriller where everyhting depends on luck and chance to make it all work, a plan that depends on which car Kennedy decides to travel in for goodness sake!

It was for the very reason of anticipating luck and chance unfavorable to the intended outcome that they had to have back-up plans, back-up shooters, back-up Patsies, and back-up locations for the Big Event. It was all very professional and the proof is in its ultimate "success."

Yep, just creating the most convoluted assassination plot ever wasn't enough - they created an equally convoluted back-up plot as well!
 
Robert Prey not understanding Irony...

So you duck the question? Was it a mistake by all at Parkland or a deliberate lie?
And how to you account for all of the Parkland witnesses seeing a large blow-out in the back of the head? Were they all lying, or simply mistaken?????
Would it be fair to say that if there was not large blow-out in the back of the head, then the Parkland witnesses were either mistaken or lying?
I believe you mean the Physicians not the Physicists. But that assertion was made a long time ago. Of course I do not believe the doctors, nurses and attendants at Parkland are lying, nor mistaken....
So were the Parkland witnesses lying or just simply mistaken???

(Crickets still chirping)
So your best guess is????, they are mistaken? Or lying? It's a simple question and does not require a PhD in Logic.
Let's go over this again one by one. Are you saying that all these witnesses from both Parkland and Bethesda are either lying or mistaken?????
So when somebody makes a joke this happens...
Robert, are you lying or mistaken about the things Clint Hill said?
Ah, ah, ah... That's the old

False dilemma (false dichotomy, fallacy of bifurcation, black-or-white fallacy): two alternative statements are held to be the only possible options, when in reality there are more.[

Your admission and apology, please.
Yes. I wonder if Robert will also make an admission and an appology? Or if he just expects it of others?
 
Robert Prey not understanding Irony...








So when somebody makes a joke this happens...


Yes. I wonder if Robert will also make an admission and an appology? Or if he just expects it of others?

I'm kinda proud of myself here. I went fishing for Stundies and I hooked a HUGE one!
 
Clayton Moore takes homophones for $200, Alex.

Clayton Moore said:
Which is the problem in protesting in the first place. What is their objective? What is their reasoning for disrupting campus peace?

Their objective is that they think they're being heard. It's called the heard mentality.
 
Oh boy....

That is the drawing provided by the Warren Commission for the purpose of mis-leading the public as to the fatal shot to the head.
Does he have any evidence for that? Evidence specified as:
Evidence for the Warren Commission misleading the public other than your word. Even you must realize that your word is about at the lowest ebb it can reach.

Well...
But in your heart, you know I'm right.


I'm sorry? That has to be a "no" right? Or has this thread suddenly become Star Wars and we can discern the truth by searching our feelings or feeling the ******* force?
 
"I dare you to cite 10 items total that have been found in all the Old Kingdom pyramids combined. I know you can't because I've done the research. Please cite your evidence for tomb theory other than a sarcophagus."

To which I replied:
"Please cite your evidence for existence other than your physical presence."

Harte
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom