• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

November Stundie Nominations

Really? I would have taken it as an argument that evidence is a theoretical construct of an intelligence. Under this interpretation, it wouldn't exist for Anders.
 
I nominate:

Would RedIbis be so kind and tell us what he thinks happened most likely on 9/11, if terrorists did not take out the airline pilots and fly planes into buildings and a field in Penn.?

Even though it's been brought to your attention multiple times, you still pull out the old 'what really happened' gambit?

Apparently, in Twoofer Land, "what really happened" (i.e. "reality") is just a toy used for gambits. Truthers are not interested in reality, only in da Twoof.
 
I nominate:



Apparently, in Twoofer Land, "what really happened" (i.e. "reality") is just a toy used for gambits. Truthers are not interested in reality, only in da Twoof.

Too common for a meme and thus too watered down for a stundie for my liking. It follows "proof, proof , we don't need no stinkin' proof'.:D
 
More from the troll who earlier agitated for reducing the age of consent...

Ivor the Engineer said:
You have proven beyond doubt you are a troll Ivor. I've made some posts here which are destined to AAH or worse, but the games you are playing are antithetical to this whole forum.

If you drink milk you probably don't have a problem with animals being sexually exploited by humans, at least as long as the human isn't enjoying it.
 
Again, not eligible because non-evolution isn't a conspiracy per se, but wow.

You missed my point.......

By clairvoyant I mean if you were a reptile and clairvoyant and you were becoming a bird, you WOULD KNOW you were becoming warm blooded before you were warm blooded. If you were a clairvoyant reptile you WOULD KNOW that your lungs were becoming one way air flow lungs a million years before they became one way air flow lungs........


But reptiles are not clairvoyant, and such is not allowed.......
 
Kirk Cameron said:
You missed my point.......

By clairvoyant I mean if you were a banana and clairvoyant and you were becoming food, you WOULD KNOW you were becoming edible before you were edible. If you were a clairvoyant banana you WOULD KNOW that you would have a handle and fit just right in a person's hand before you had a handle and fit just right ........

But bananas are not clairvoyant, and such is not allowed.......


Sorry ... that quote just reminded me of the silly banana thing for some reason.

-- Roger
 
Last edited:
Yeah, well Facebook is probably a little more reliable than the mainstream news media

Wow,, uh, just WOW!

If one were to check my own facebook page one would have an incorrect idea of when my birthday is and what year I was born. I chose NOT to have that info available to the entire world so I LIED! In fact every website that asks that question gets a different date from me just because I feel like it.:p
 
I demand to know why they didn't see the Easter Bunny too!

http://www.amazon.com/review/R2684D...HFAQE0B&cdMsgID=MxAD1L1K1CTAWK#MxAD1L1K1CTAWK

If the people who you claim inspected the ruins and debris did so carefully, how did they fail to see evidence for molten metals, which was found and reported on in both the dust deposited by the fallen buildings as well as in the site's debris? And if they did see such evidence, why would they have attributed this to the plane impacts and ensuing fires, when these fires couldn't come close to producing the temperatures necessary to melt and/or vaporize the metals?
 
Wow,, uh, just WOW!

If one were to check my own facebook page one would have an incorrect idea of when my birthday is and what year I was born. I chose NOT to have that info available to the entire world so I LIED! In fact every website that asks that question gets a different date from me just because I feel like it.:p

If one believed the information on my FB account were serious and reliable, one would conclude that I really would love to own underpants made of knitted wool with a long slim extra leg for my penis. Well, it ain't so :D
 
Is Robert maxed out yet on Stundie nominations for this month? Can I get this one in under the wire?



The man is a fountain of gems like this.

But thats how he knows all those doctors were telling the truth about JFK having the wrong wounds, he checked them on facebook!

And twitter coroborated!
 
I demand to know why they didn't see the Easter Bunny too!

http://www.amazon.com/review/R2684D...HFAQE0B&cdMsgID=MxAD1L1K1CTAWK#MxAD1L1K1CTAWK

If the people who you claim inspected the ruins and debris did so carefully, how did they fail to see evidence for molten metals, which was found and reported on in both the dust deposited by the fallen buildings as well as in the site's debris? And if they did see such evidence, why would they have attributed this to the plane impacts and ensuing fires, when these fires couldn't come close to producing the temperatures necessary to melt and/or vaporize the metals?


I like how this person is careful enough to use "metal" instead of "steel", but then still uses the "fire couldn't melt X" talking point. So now we have a bizarre—and I'm sure unintentional—claim that the fires couldn't have melted any of the metals present in the towers. Awesome.
 
As it isn't like the half of the population who survived didn't get out alive because of the natural process that Vaccines rely on.

I wonder why he chose that, and not the Black Death, or any of the other outbreaks of varying plagues?
 
Since there is no December thread yet ****AHEMMMMM!!!!!!***** *Cough TRAVIS* cough....

Here's a doozie from our very own Clayton Moore.

Blah, blah, blah. Whenever it can the media beats a story to death.

Every minute detail is reviewed over and over. Every witness is interviewed over and over. Every statement is examined and reexamined for possible new twists and turns for MORE story lines.

Not so WTC7. Or 9/11. Or the Pentagon

Wait, so you mean to tell me the 24/7 broadcast from NYC that went on for weeks, wasn't the media? Who the hell was it then......:boxedin:
 
“verbatim” redux, birther style
youarejoking: The Court has said that subject is to monarchy as citizen is to republic.

"The term "citizen," as understood in our law, is precisely analogous to the term "subject" in the common law, and the change of phrase has entirely resulted from the change of government. The sovereignty has been transferred from one man to the collective body of the people, and he who before as a "subject of the king" is now "a citizen of the State." State v. Manuel (1838), 4 Dev. & Bat. 20, 24-26., as quoted in WKA

ksdb:
"precisely analogous" does NOT mean "exactly the same." You want it to, but it doesn't. There are fundamental differences.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics...irthers-spark-chaos-in-new-hampshire/249170/#
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom