• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

November Stundie Nominations

If we all followed this advice from W.A.T.C.H. then anyone with kids would be in trouble, or perhaps just in the dark...

[URL=http://toysafety.org/toy9.shtml]W.A.T.C.H[/URL] said:
W.A.T.C.H. OUT! This oven uses standard 120-volt house current and shrinks a “shrinky dink” in a “heating chamber” with a 60-watt light bulb. A parent or caregiver needs no further indication that this oven could be dangerous than the litany of warnings and cautions on the toy itself and the packaging, including:

“CAUTION-ELECTRIC TOY: As with all electric products, precautions
shall be observed…to prevent electric shock.”
“WARNING: SHOCK HAZARD. Pull plug before changing light bulb.”
“DANGER – To prevent electric shock, do not immerse in water….”
“CAUTION – SUPERVISION REQUIRED - ELECTRIC TOY- UNPLUG WHEN NOT IN USE.”

A product with so many inherent hazards does not lend itself to use in a home environment with children.

Time to give up those hair-dryers, toasters, TVs, DVD's, oh, and your computer, iPad, and anything else you plug into the wall.
 
Last edited:
Haven't won the lottery? It's a conspiracy.

"what I have had the feeling for years is that their machines are fixed, when I say that their chosen selected numbers are already chosen before the event on live TV, these balls have somekind of magnet inside of them which the machine on live TV picks, they are drawn out by deception right in front of everyones eyes giving the delusion that they were randomly selected but rigged before the event!."

Obviously the fact that the odds of winning the lottery are over 14 million to one doesn't enter into it.

I've met people like that - they often have a lucky charm that prevents them from being struck by lightning / eaten by bears / abducted by aliens and similar everyday occurrences.
 
Last edited:
One more from Robert Prey:

So now you duck the question 3 times. Frame 362 shows the object, briefly.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdgRADuzdo0&feature=player_detailpage#t=0s

It probably doesn't qualify as a Stundie because it's useless without the context but this needs to be seen to be believed. Robert has been ducking questions for over 1200 posts (and this post is a direct reply to 8 of those questions) yet he has the audacity to accuse someone else of the same behavior. He follows that up by saying he can see something clearly in a film that he has claimed over and over again is too blurry to see anything clearly.
 
One more from Robert Prey:



It probably doesn't qualify as a Stundie because it's useless without the context but this needs to be seen to be believed. Robert has been ducking questions for over 1200 posts (and this post is a direct reply to 8 of those questions) yet he has the audacity to accuse someone else of the same behavior. He follows that up by saying he can see something clearly in a film that he has claimed over and over again is too blurry to see anything clearly.

And I would like to point out I am not, and will not accuse one of his sources of telling lies or being mistaken in their expert opinion. I will however continue to suggest they may not be recalling their experiences accurately based on material evidence. More than that I will continue to ask why these eye witnesses should be considered any more or less accurate than those whose accounts they conflict with.

By suggesting I was accussing anybody of anything Robert is shoving words into my mouth. He appears unwilling to concede a difference between "I have no evidence to support this view and no reason to assume it is true" and "uh oh you are telling porkies."
 
Communist guerillas in Borneo must have had very thick skulls - or heads as devoid of grey matter as conspiracy theorists.

http://forum.davidicke.com/showpost.php?p=1060376938&postcount=4116

"Was discussing this with a friend of mine, he related an incident in Borneo where a communist geurilla was hit in the head at about 15 metres' range by 3 bullets from a sten gun. He turned and ran, then was killed by a grenade. They found that the bullets had penetrated 2 inches into his skull, without going through to the brain."
 
"You may think this is off topic, but IMO it is a testament to the type of scum involved in the 911 mega ritual. Occultists use children in rituals, how do you know that Sandusky was not a man involved in 911. After all, both John & Mike Cappelletti went to Penn State & played football there. I have learned of at least 2 other men at Penn State who were involved in the occult beside the Cappellettis."

From a thread on the Icke forums about no-plane theory (did you expect anything less:))

So it was the Jews, then it was Bush, now it's Jerry Sandusky from Penn State.
 
There was an Moon landing hoax theorist, so notorious we still don't mention his name, who would "enhance" Apollo photos by looking at his monitor through a mangifying glass.

I believe that it was AE911T that had a video of a broadcast from Sept11/01 in which they pointed out various items supposedly showing suspicious things. At the beginning we see Al Roker doing his on the street walk about. The video is so compressed and re-compressed that Mr. Roker's face was an amorphorous tan coloured area and yet supposedly we could see great detail when the cameras were on the towers.
 
Indeed, Dilbert is funny because its often true.
,,,, I work for a telecommunications company not too far removed from Dilbert's line of work.
Actually, Scott Adams started drawing the strip while working for Pacific Bell.
 
"You may think this is off topic, but IMO it is a testament to the type of scum involved in the 911 mega ritual. Occultists use children in rituals, how do you know that Sandusky was not a man involved in 911. After all, both John & Mike Cappelletti went to Penn State & played football there. I have learned of at least 2 other men at Penn State who were involved in the occult beside the Cappellettis."

From a thread on the Icke forums about no-plane theory (did you expect anything less:))

So it was the Jews, then it was Bush, now it's Jerry Sandusky from Penn State.

This one has my vote this month.
 
It really shouldn't count because Patrick1000/fattydash/DoctorTea/etc./etc. is a troll, but it's still funny: After matt.tansy, from his personal experience as a chief electronics technician on ballistic missile submarines, carefully explains how the inertial guidance system from which the missiles are updated doesn't itself need to be updated every femtosecond, the pretend doctor/mathematician/writer/scientist/engineer trots out his own expertise. Bolding mine.

...At the tale end of a Popular Science, May 1958 article, QUICK TRIGGER MISSILE, the author claims the missile's guidance system must know EXACTLY where it is for the launch to be successful in terms of providing the requisite accuracy...

After all, who are you going to listen to, a half-century old Popular Science article or (*snort*) just some guy who's actually operated the guidance systems?
 
Oswald claimed to be a Marxist, but actually was a loyal patriotic American who loved his country, loved his president, was a former US Marine, worked for Naval Intelligence, as well as an operative for CIA and FBI, was sent to USSR after having been sheep dipped as a disloyal American, but never revoked his citizenship, was apparently sent to language school so that he could speak fluent Russian, then sent to USSR so that he could spy for the US. While he made a big splash with the Fair Play for Cuba Committee, he was also working with anti-Castro groups at the same time. Someday, when the full truth is accepted, he should be posthumously awarded the Medal of Freedom.

I'm..uhhh...wow...really?
 
Doesn't he have to have retired first? As far as I know his promised final post, in which he conclusively proves everyone else but him to have been wrong all along, has yet to materialise, but we can always hope.

Dave

Oh the FINAL NAIL did appear, but was not so final as once promised.
 
In the ineligible-because-it's-not-actually-a-CT category, surely Justinian2 deserves honors for getting frustrated and demanding
You want your opinions to be considered because???????
You think your opinions should be considered because???????

In a thread he started and titled "What do you think of Scientology?"

Really. The nerve of people giving him their opinions.
 

Back
Top Bottom