Continuing from the
Masonic CT recap. . .
Mignini gets a 16 month prison sentence for abuse of office and to you bringing that up is "self evident proof of a dirty campaign against him"? Why isn't it
self evident proof that he is an untrustworthy criminal?
Do you think you can say whatever unproven thing you want about someone because has a pending charge? (which you don't even know about)
Your is a dirty campaign, made of falsehoods. The conviction of Mignini is for you merely an instrument to take advantage from in order to insinuate lies that have nothing to do with it. In fact, you don't even know anything about Mignini's conviction nor about his actual personal credibility. And you seem to ignore the chain of judges and prosecution offices that do the same things Mignini does.
I think you are all quite crazy here, in fact. There is no shed of rationality in your immagination about Mignini. Your assertions and speculations about "leaks" or "crimes" by Mignini are nonsense.
Now that RS and AK have been found innocent perhaps the only "criminal interest" being served here is your bizzaro defense of Mignini
.
First of all they will be "found" innocent or guilty only after the Cassazione. By now, Knox is actually convicted for calunnia, not innocent.
And calunnia is not abuse of office.
Do you have a better translation of what Mignini said? Maybe you missed it on PMF since it was promptly erased but I told you and The Machine that the date Mignini said the halloween sect stuff in court was probably October 18, 2008.
No "sect". And nothing "satanic".
Mignini described a sexual murder, in which Meredith was killed in a sexual context by more than one individual. In describing his idea of the dinamic, he defined it "rito sessuale casereccio", which roughly could be translated as a "home made sexual rite". But be careful! The translation is improper, word "rito" in Italian has a much wider meaning than "rite" or "ritual". In fact it is a much commonlyu used word in wide contexts. For example, the short track trial chosen by Rudy Gude is called "rito abbreviato".
"Rito" means in most cases, "procedure", or "custom", or even "practice".
Then Mignini speculated that the murder could have originated by some kind of meeting or night students meeting/party or prank that could have been vaguelly inspired in some way to the atmosphere of Halloween.
Then he also mentioned some material that would show some complex aspects of the personality of defendants: Sollecito's penchant for knifes, violent and bestiality porn, and his favourite mainstream manga, the main charachter of which is a young man - shy, nerd kind - whose mind is telepatically captured by the thoughts of a serial killer who kills nude girls with a knife on a sacrifice altar, by the ende the main charachter is transformed into a devil.
Material like this is merely elements to show aspects of the personality of defendants, as he is required by law to do, in order to show that their personalities are complex and not the stereotypes they may try to look like.
I didn't find this thoughts by Mignini entirely irrational.
To put this in perspective remember Mignini was investigating a crime scene with a break in involving a habitual burglar
I think instead this is stereotypical and superficial by you and the innocentisti.
I think the idea of a sexual murder originated from a sexual meeting of drugged students, where conflict among Amanda and Meredith and an escalation due to the presence of two rival guys - Guede and Sollecito - is the actual frame in which the incident developed.
I don't think the evidence point in the direction of a burglar at all.
Why are you bringing Preston into this? All I have been quoting is you and Mignini. This isn't PMF where you can blame Preston for all the stupid things Mignini has said.
Preston is an example of dirty campaign by a liat. A comparison between a consistent, normal and logical account (by Mignini) and an impossible absurd story by Preston. This is an example of how Mignini is trustworth compared to one of his detractors.
Here is proof of "a half dozen false stories", and I am even making a point of only selecting stories there is such incontrovertible evidence against that even those who still think AK and RS know they are false:
You did not say half dozen false stories. You said
the police (they, who?)
leaked false information.
Where is the evidence, and the logic of this. Nowhere.
On any case, in Italy, there is leak of anything from the investigation. Always. It is unavoidable. It is not the police. It is the structural lack of secrecy due to the huge number of lawyers that can access the evidence files: it is an eccess of transparency. The problem is, that you don't live in Itlym so you don't know this.
1.Investigators falsely say Knox called Guede twice on night of the murder.
Investigators say Mr Guede left Perugia on the morning after the murder and went to Milan, where he was stopped by police but not detained. Detectives locked on to his mobile phone signal in Milan as recently as this weekend, but it then went dead. Amanda Knox made at least two calls to his number, one of them at 11am on 2 November, around the time police discovered Kercher's body.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-fourth-suspect-in-kercher-murder-758731.html
Never heared this story in Italy.
2. Police lie and say "clear cut image" of knox on CCTV footage shows her entering home contradicting here alibi and placing her at time and place of murder.
Who is the leaker? Moreover they had a footage some believed to be Knox. They were following that path. And where is the lie?
(moreover, cite Italian sources, not second hand reports from another countries)
3. Police say two receipts for bleach were found for morning after the murder time stamped at 8:30am and 9:15am.
Again, recepts were indeed found and collected. You just don't like these leaks. But what does that mean? Where is the lie? Where is malice, purpose, logic? And who did the leak?
And what does the original source say exactly?
4. Police release bogus bloody bathroom picture to media spurring the idea that Knox is crazed psycho killer.
Pure nonsense. The photo only appeared on a British tabloid. You think the police purposely deciodes to chose a picture and send it to a newspaper (a British one) in order to deceive the public with red colour. But do you realize how stupid and obtuse this idea is? And do you realize that this is your imagination working up the scenario? The photo was chosen by journalist with the purpse of selling copies on morbid arguments. It was chosen from a huge set provided by some of the tens (hundreds) of lawyers and officers who accessed the court chancelry. Lawyers even remotely related to a firma linked to one of the seven legal parties involved in the investigation or to a preliminary investigation judge office.
The only real unlawful and malicious leak was made by Sollecito's family using Telenorba and local pres in Puglia.
I skip the rest, including the Harry Potter book, they are to be treated like the first ones.
What I see is that you infer things against the police (who?) or the procura, from these media issues which are, instead, to me totally irrelevant. They mean nothing. There is nothing of what you say against magistrates or police in these press information. You blame people that have nothing to do with it for rubbish published on newspapers (maybe British tabloids).
In my mind, and my mindset, thing like thse have nothing to do with "police leaks" or police lies. These are leaks and stories that occurr always on any case in Italy and have nothing to do with police or prosecution. They are endemic to the Italian system, they are simply not prevented from happening. Take as an opposite example, all the leaks and press campaigns against the police that occurred on Italian magazines like Oggi, Panorama, on Telenorba. You don't have the slightest idea of what the Italian press passes along in campaigns against magistrates.
