Is Islam an evil religion?

[catsmate]

It did, in 1852.

And planned to in 1945.

Believe it. Religion again. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partition_of_India

Ah, "population exchanges" a charming euphemism.

Anyway this is my take:

 

[Craig B]

And planned to in 1945.



Ah, "population exchanges" a charming euphemism.

To my list of British imperial partitions - Ireland, India - I should have added another: Palestine. I think we see a sort of religious pattern developing here.

 

[FireGarden]

Hey, most of us Brits are okay!


And, Bill, I see you've discovered that you can swear in links. You should pick different names for your pictures, before a mod notices and suspends you again.

 

[Bill Thompson]

I find that hard to believe.

 

[Bill Thompson]

Bill

I wrote: In response you offer this prayer, but unfortunately it doesn't appear to have been fulfilled. And then you comment: Answer. No, I'm not saying that. I have never said that. I do not know what you would "like to admit". I said what I said and it's all down in black and White.

Try another prayer to mighty Xenu to grant your theatan wisdom so that your mysteries may be dispelled. Better luck this time. What about sacrificing a goat? It might work. Gods love that stuff.

Craig, what is the reasoning behind your posting history? What does the the invasion of Turkey by the Greeks mean? Didn't you suggest it was a lesson in religous intollerance?

 

[Bill Thompson]

Bill

The people who died in India and Pakistan were victims of the British policy of partition, seen in operation also in Ireland, which encouraged murderous expressions of religious hostility. That does not, of course, absolve the immediate perpetrators; any more than Greek aggression against Turkey absolved the Turks who burned the ethnic Greek city of Smyrna and expelled its residents.

I note that Gandhi was a Hindu, so I wondered why you were so hostile, but now I see: Gandhi proposed a policy of peace between different religious communities. You are disparaging this because you want hate and war to be directed against Muslims, who are currently the favourite scapegoat of the extreme right (whose ideology always requires a scapegoat) just as Jews were in the early and mid 20th century.

Also, please stop the nonsense about compassion and sympathy and big hugs, your current motif. You're working it to death, as with other of your ideas. Again, you risk ridicule.

You got some things a little off.

Yeah he was Hindu and he was shot by one of his own who was sick of his passifist attitude towards the Muslims. As I recall, the shooter had lost his whole family to Muslim killers.

 

[Bill Thompson]

wow, bill......you need a dube.

To do my laundry.

 

[Craig B]

You got some things a little off.

Yeah he was Hindu and he was shot by one of his own who was sick of his passifist attitude towards the Muslims. As I recall, the shooter had lost his whole family to Muslim killers.

Give me your source for that "recollection". Now.

 

[Craig B]

Here is Gandhi's assassin's final plea to the court. Does he mention his whole family having been killed by Muslims? Apart from anything else, his brother was a co-accused!
http://smileosmile.com/celebrities/why-i-killed-gandhi-nathuram-godses-final-address-to-the-court/ I say he was a bigoted religious extremist. So show me your sources!

 

[Bill Thompson]

Uh Huh. What is your point? How is this connected to the topic of this discussion thread?

 

[Bill Thompson]

Give me your source for that "recollection". Now.

I don't remember.

And it does not really matter, ya know. This minutia part is not the main issue.

The point is, it was someone from his own religion and/or camp.

Also, the point is, Ghandi failed to prevent the greatest period of violence in the history of India through his passifist ideology.

 

[Bill Thompson]

Craig, what was that whole business about Turkey anyway? So it was not an invasion because of religion. So why did you bring it up so many times? It must be important. It must mean something. What does it mean?

 

[catsmate]

Uh Huh. What is your point? How is this connected to the topic of this discussion thread?

It's further evidence that your "recollections" tend to be, well, wrong.

 

[Craig B]

I don't remember.

And it does not really matter, ya know. This minutia part is not the main issue. The point is, it was someone from his own religion and/or camp. Also, the point is, Ghandi failed to prevent the greatest period of violence in the history of India through his passifist ideology.

That is disgusting. I am finding it so difficult to maintain the assumption that I am dealing with an honest interlocutor, that I regret I must ignore any further posts you make. In taking my leave of you, may I suggest that you stop posting here, and confine yourself to the Sturmer-style hate sites where they are similarly indifferent to the "minutia part" (i.e. truth or accuracy) of the statements that they themselves introduce into the public domain.

Go back to Ali Sina, and Spencer, and Gellar. That will be more congenial for you. Oh yes, and Anders Behring Breivik's family were all murdered by Muslim immigrants, so he should have got off with probation and 100 hours community service. Or am I wrong about that "minutia"? Who cares? Ali Sina will love it.

 

[Bill Thompson]

Anyway this is my take:
{{Insanely huge image with big letters}}

Guess what? It does not matter. You know, the Taliban had nothing directly to do with 9-11. But there was a connection in the way that members were married to each other and the fact that Osama was an important guest there. So, say good bye to the Taliban. But wait. There is more. There is much much more. Saddam's Iraq had absolutely nothing at all to do with 9-11. But I guess we were kind of at war with them already with the shooting at our planes patrolling the no-fly zones and we were not feeling safe like we were before 9-11 with the Ocean between us and Iraq. So say good bye to Saddam's Iraq. Now, hold on, read the next paragraph before replying to what I have said so far.

You post this picture with giant letters making comparisons with other people who were of one religion or another. But there is a difference. Hitler would have been a bad guy even if he was not a Christian because his Christianity had nothing to do with what he did. Stalin would have been a bad guy even if he was not an atheist because his atheism had nothing to do with what he did.

If Osama bin Laden had not been a Muslim, he would have never left his life of comfort in Saudi Arabia to help the Moojahadeen drive the Soviets out of Afghanistan, he would not have been upset upon coming home to Saudi Arabia a the sight of Infidel troops in Saudi Arabia and he would not have created Al Qaeda and he and other Muslims would not have thought up 9-11.

Did Islam play a role in 9-11? Of course. So say good bye to this old outdated lie. Muslims leaders and scolars have seen the light. Some are struggling to revise Islam. Some have wised up and abandoned ship.

 

[Bill Thompson]

It's further evidence that your "recollections" tend to be, well, wrong.

Nuh HUH. See my last post. So there !!

Maybe on some level I throw some things into the mix to watch deserving dolts pull their hair out. Maybe. I mean, this is not an op-ed piece or a blog. If others post ramblings about Syria or Bosnia or something that happened in the 1400s and then fail to explain what they mean, the proverbial bar is lowered, don't you think?

 

[Bill Thompson]

That is disgusting. I am finding it so difficult to maintain the assumption that I am dealing with an honest interlocutor, that I regret I must ignore any further posts you make. In taking my leave of you, may I suggest that you stop posting here, and confine yourself to the Sturmer-style hate sites where they are similarly indifferent to the "minutia part" (i.e. truth or accuracy) of the statements that they themselves introduce into the public domain.

Go back to Ali Sina, and Spencer, and Gellar. That will be more congenial for you. Oh yes, and Anders Behring Breivik's family were all murdered by Muslim immigrants, so he should have got off with probation and 100 hours community service. Or am I wrong about that "minutia"? Who cares? Ali Sina will love it.

It is minuta. It has nothing to do with the big picture. Can you see the big picture?

When "Unfit for Command" hit the press, for example, Liberals went over that book word for word for any flaw or error. Of course, they found one because the book was written by human beings. But that does not mean the meaning and purpose of the book is wrong.

So the killer did not have his whole family wiped out. Big deal. It does not matter. I was not sure, and that is why I specified that this was what I remembered.

Who is Al Sina? Sounds like an Arab name to me. So he is an ex-muslim, right? Is he someone you brush aside by just calling him names like a "hater"?

I never said Anders Behring Breivik's family was murdered by Muslim immigrants exactly. You misquote me again.

The point is this. Ghandi was killed by a fellow Hindu, wasn't he? Wasn't he killed because he was too passive to Muslims?

A good friend of mine is a Muslim and an Indian. You do not have to be an immigrant to be a Muslimin India.

So, are you going to tell me what your point is in all this or not?

You seem to be saying that you are going to stop posting and you are finding a way to pin this action on me. Nice try. You never ever ever ever had a point to make. You never had a point to make when you were talking about the invasion of Turkey. You never had a point to make when you were talking about Bosnia. You never had a point to make when you were talking about Syria. That was all you, man. Not me.

 

[Bill Thompson]

Hey, most of us Brits are okay!


And, Bill, I see you've discovered that you can swear in links. You should pick different names for your pictures, before a mod notices and suspends you again.

People seem to be doing this by using the "spoiler" tool, I have noticed.

 

[Cleon]

Give me your source for that "recollection". Now.

I don't remember.

Once more, with feeling!

I would only make a statement if I was 100% sure or had proof at hand.

 

[zooterkin]

People seem to be doing this by using the "spoiler" tool, I have noticed.

Doesn't make that, or what you did, right. If neither has been reported to the moderators, then they may not be aware of it. I suspect both would be against the MA. Let's find out, shall we?