Richard Gage Blueprint for Truth Rebuttals on YouTube by Chris Mohr

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mr.Herbert said:
Back in 08 there was a discussion about the GZ pile.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=127109&page=1

ElMondoHummus posted a report from SH&E who were at Ground Zero.

http://911research.wtc7.net/cache/wtc/analysis/asse_groundzero1.htm

NASA Images from AVIRIS:

http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0429/thermal.r09.html

I too was unable to find the DEA info.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/member.php?u=12386
Click to expand...

You can go for all the exotic explanations you like as a cause for the enormous heat underground for 100 days despite millions of gallons of water being continuously pumped in to cool it but the fact remains that the ONLY possible explanation is a giant pool of molten steel in the basements. Up to 15,000 tons of it in fact.
 
bill smith said:
You can go for all the exotic explanations you like as a cause for the enormous heat underground for 100 days despite millions of gallons of water being continuously pumped in to cool it but the fact remains that the ONLY possible explanation is a giant pool of molten steel in the basements. Up to 15,000 tons of it in fact.
Click to expand...

You and reality aren't on close terms, are you?
 
bill smith said:
You can go for all the exotic explanations you like as a cause for the enormous heat underground for 100 days despite millions of gallons of water being continuously pumped in to cool it but the fact remains that the ONLY possible explanation is a giant pool of molten steel in the basements. Up to 15,000 tons of it in fact.
Click to expand...

You're aware that 15,000 tons of molten steel will, at some point, become solid again? And that it would be terribly hard to miss, given the fact that hundreds of people were onsite from start to finish?

Where are the OMG pictures of a giant slab of previously molten steel?
 
bill smith said:
You can go for all the exotic explanations you like as a cause for the enormous heat underground for 100 days despite millions of gallons of water being continuously pumped in to cool it but the fact remains that the ONLY possible explanation is a giant pool of molten steel in the basements. Up to 15,000 tons of it in fact.
Click to expand...

Bill,

Is there any particular reason why you continue to spew lies and garbage throughout this forum, yet when you are called on them, you just ignore and move on?
 
bill smith said:
You can go for all the exotic explanations you like as a cause for the enormous heat underground for 100 days despite millions of gallons of water being continuously pumped in to cool it but the fact remains that the ONLY possible explanation is a giant pool of molten steel in the basements. Up to 15,000 tons of it in fact.
Click to expand...
Tell this to Tri. He was there and he knows more than the rest of us combined about the temperatures of the fires!
 
Guys, five separate responses to something written by "bill smith?" Please use the ignore function to make this thread at least somewhat readable. If I stay in this subforum, I'm going to have to use that feature on those who respond to his nonsense, and I'd rather not.
 
I hesitated to list my 235 reasons because I thought they'd be waved away with pithy one-phrase remarks. This is what is happening. Each reason is supported on my video by 30-60 seconds of explanation. Pick one you want to talk about and look a little deeper, I'd suggest.
 
chrismohr said:
Tell this to Tri. He was there and he knows more than the rest of us combined about the temperatures of the fires!
Click to expand...

You can ignore Bill. He's here to jerk our chains. If I told him I was the one who pressed the demolish button, he'd believe that too.
 
Chris,

I just finished reading your eSkeptic article, 9/11 and the Science of Controlled Demolitions, and I just want to commend you.

I haven't watched your videos, because I don't need convincing 9/11 wasn't an inside job, but I have to say that that is one of the best articles debunking 9/11 conspiracy theories I've ever read (and I've read a lot).

My sincere congratulations on a job well done! :clap:
 
chrismohr said:
Tell this to Tri. He was there and he knows more than the rest of us combined about the temperatures of the fires!
Click to expand...

It's obvious Chris. THere's no getting around it,wriggle though you may. And that tells us most of what we need to know about the collapses. The exact details cannot be extracted from what we do know but we can easily assess where such a massive volume of molten steel came from. I wrote something on this before and if you like I can give you a link.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
You can go for all the exotic explanations you like as a cause for the enormous heat underground for 100 days despite millions of gallons of water being continuously pumped in to cool it but the fact remains that the ONLY possible explanation is a giant pool of molten steel in the basements. Up to 15,000 tons of it in fact.
Click to expand...

Will there be math to support your claim, or is this another kitchen table judgement based on nonsense?


I have to see the picture of 15,000 tons of steel melted into a big pile being removed from the WTC complex. Where is the photo? Big truck? Is there a 15,000 ton truck? Is it a Big Tundra?

Next time make up a number that can be hauled out of the WTC complex in a truck, the biggest truck can hold 300 tons, your 15,000 tons is a big lie, try some math, or rational thinking next time to make it less delusional. Why do you lie and support lies from 911 truth?
 
beachnut said:
Will there be math to support your claim, or is this another kitchen table judgement based on nonsense?


I have to see the picture of 15,000 tons of steel melted into a big pile being removed from the WTC complex. Where is the photo? Big truck? Is there a 15,000 ton truck? Is it a Big Tundra?

Next time make up a number that can be hauled out of the WTC complex in a truck, the biggest truck can hold 300 tons, your 15,000 tons is a big lie, try some math, or rational thinking next time to make it less delusional. Why do you lie and support lies from 911 truth?
Click to expand...

Hi Beachnut. The solidified steel is most likely largely still there.Would you like to have the link where I explain my hypthesis of it all ?
 
Last edited:
Skeptic.com article

Hi all,

My skeptic.com com article on 9/11 controlled demolition just appeared and here it is:

http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/11-09-07/

Also, I made two playlists for YouTube for the Twin Towers (2 hours 9 minutes total) and Building 7 (1:39 total time):


http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL92DAE5DE3C22CF4F&feature=viewall
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLDD5BD81A636031A5&feature=viewall

I'm getting a lot of flack for not having open forums on all 22 videos, a task way beyond what I'd ever want to manage. We're at almost 6000 views!
 
chrismohr said:
Hi all,

My skeptic.com com article on 9/11 controlled demolition just appeared and here it is:

http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/11-09-07/

Also, I made two playlists for YouTube for the Twin Towers (2 hours 9 minutes total) and Building 7 (1:39 total time):


http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL92DAE5DE3C22CF4F&feature=viewall
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLDD5BD81A636031A5&feature=viewall

I'm getting a lot of flack for not having open forums on all 22 videos, a task way beyond what I'd ever want to manage. We're at almost 6000 views!
Click to expand...

Excellent read, Chris. This is why dolts like me defer to folks like you. Very well done.
 
bill smith said:
Hi Beachnut. The solidified steel is most likely largely still there.Would you like to have the link where I explain my hypthesis of it all ?
Click to expand...

Yeah, I need a laugh today.

I take it that it you missed "Rising"? The memorial museum is in the same hole as your "15,000" tons of steel.......unless they are disguising it as a crushed firetruck, it ain't there. Unless of course now to are adding the hundreds of guys who built the Memorial to the list of conspirators ..............
 
chrismohr said:
Hi all,

My skeptic.com com article on 9/11 controlled demolition just appeared and here it is:
Click to expand...



In the article there is a picture with this caption "Shown here a 600,000 pound beam from the World Trade Center hangs from a nearby building."


600000 lbs is about 300 tons......heavy as those beams are they are not that heavy!

Also those beams simply peeled away from the WTC towers as they fell. The tower was 1300 odd feet high and that point is less than 600 feet from where tower 1 was. Even without the air blast there is nothing magic about columns ending that far out.
 
sheeplesnshills said:
Yeah, I need a laugh today.

I take it that it you missed "Rising"? The memorial museum is in the same hole as your "15,000" tons of steel.......unless they are disguising it as a crushed firetruck, it ain't there. Unless of course now to are adding the hundreds of guys who built the Memorial to the list of conspirators ..............
Click to expand...

THey wouldn't have seen a thing. The steel ingot or ingots would have been concreted over way before construction started. The cavity(ies) that the bulk of the molten steel flowed into was/were most likely deep below the lowest basement floor.
 
Last edited:
sheeplesnshills said:
In the article there is a picture with this caption "Shown here a 600,000 pound beam from the World Trade Center hangs from a nearby building."


600000 lbs is about 300 tons......heavy as those beams are they are not that heavy!

Also those beams simply peeled away from the WTC towers as they fell. The tower was 1300 odd feet high and that point is less than 600 feet from where tower 1 was. Even without the air blast there is nothing magic about columns ending that far out.
Click to expand...

I guess the 600,000 pound beam was a 'typo'. I'd love to see that four-ton chunk being carried by a peeling wall to a distance of 600 feet.(nearly two football fields end-to-end) Higher does not mrean further, especially in a straight-down-to-the-ground exclusively gravity driven collapse like WTC1 is supposed to have been according to the government story..
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom