Rick Shaddock runs the site. Some of the responses to my debating points are relatively well thought out, and others are just made-up idle speculation just to fill in a box. I told Richard Gage personally (when we met at the AIA Convention in July) that it needed more thought on his side . The weakest rebuttals are so weak I could do better filling them in myself. Definitely a work in progress on the 9/11 Truth side. In the meantime, I got help from pgimeno, ozeco41, oystein, Ryan Mackey, Dave Thomas, etc. Honestly I'm very proud of the extensive compilation of links etc I put together on my side, it's a true compendium of a veritable hit parade of thoughtful rebuttals.
The Rick Shaddock? http://www.aneta.org/members/Rick/ Helped Citizen Investigation Team with witness point of view research? Rick is a no plane supporter.
http://www.aneta.org/ Wow.
Did http://www.911mensa.org/ Mensa make him take down the silly web site which makes Mensa members look like nuts who can't think logically?
http://www.obamatruth.us/ Look, Rick is a patriot, who supports dumber than dirt lies. Is he a Holocaust denier too?
http://www.jfktruth.org/ And JFK. No fake conspiracy too stupid for Rick's support?
The funny part is Rick thinks he is winning the debate - with an MA in education, something failed. Is he making fun of 911 truth?
Rick says he is a volunteer on the Writing Team of www.AE911Truth.org. Anyone fooled by AE has problems with reality. Is AE no plane too? lol, not exactly, but ...
Rick proposes that Flight 77 was taken over by Remote Control, with Lock Out of Navigation and Communication, and flew North of Citgo, hitting the Pentagon near right angles, and that pre-planted explosives did the rest.
lol, Rick needs a new investigation because he has no clue there were hundreds already done, and 19 terrorists did it. Can't wait for his lock out navigation communication explanation. wow
Last edited: