• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Reasonable doubt...All truthers(and whoever esle) please read

I am not an enthusiatic enough typist to list all individual non sequitors put forth by the general truth movement:D

However I suppose I should add one of tmd's favs.
He says that the molten material found in the underground must be steel because, primarily, other people said it was steel. Given that there is no solid evidence that the material they were looking at was steel and not copper, aluminum, tin or glass mixed with large amounts of carbon based debris it is a non sequitor to deduce that it was steel.

Does tmd think that the buildings were made entirely of steel and contained nothing but steel?
 
So let me get this straight. I'm not spewing the 911truth call because I'm afraid to take my "real" views mainstream? Am I reading this right?

I will address you, because I believe you are intelligent, and perhaps open minded. Above all you have been more respectful then 90% of the posters here. So I appreciate that. Look at these previous posts, simply just trying paint an impossible picture, none of it's worth addressing. Whoever wishes can read through the posts and see what I said about who could be or not be involved. I will answer jayheedness on his one question, because I believe it to be a decent question, and will respond when ready.

Anyway getting to your point. I never said any such thing about you. Only you know what your real views are. My point about, against the mainstream...is that it is difficult for someone (anyone) to do so. I had a very hard time with it. There has been a very concerted effort to create an atmosphere that everyone believes the official story in 9/11. To question it in unpatriotic, disrespectful to the victims families. I believe it is the exact opposite of this. It is the truest sense of patriotism, our founding fathers made it quite clear they wanted the citizens to rise up against tyrannical governments/leaders. I believe we have a duty to find out exactly what happened that day. In terms of disrespecting the victims, again I believe it to be the exact opposite. If what happened on that was not as presented, again we have a duty to find out who did it. What family member would be angry about wanting to make sure we know everything that happened that day? Even if the official story turned out to be true.

There has also been an effort to paint all conspiracy theorists as "loons" You know tin foil hat wearing cult fanatics. They haven't gotten anything published in a respectable journal. How they can possibly be right? There has been a very concentrated effort with this.

They have an agenda of painting this very large and impossible conspiracy. A clear example...is saying the FBI has been implicated. When even if one thinks some at the FBI had something to do with it (I personally believe the FBI had next to nothing to do with it) they make it sound like you are saying the whole FBI was in on it.

Lastly and perhaps most importantly, it is very hard for an individual to make that mental leap. They don't want to think about if the official story is not true, what does that mean? It is a very scary thought. It is more comforting to believe the official story of 9/11.

Look through this thread, and other threads you will see examples of all this. This is what I mean about pressure to go against mainstream.
 
Last edited:
I will address you, because I believe you are intelligent, and perhaps open minded. Above all you have been more respectful then 90% of the posters here. So I appreciate that. Look at these previous posts, simply just trying paint an impossible picture, none of it's worth addressing. Whoever wishes can read through the posts and see what I said about who could be or not be involved. I will answer jayheedness on his one question, because I believe it to be a decent question, and will respond when ready.

Anyway getting to your point. I never said any such thing about you. Only you know what your real views are. My point about, against the mainstream...is that it is difficult for someone (anyone) to do so. I had a very hard time with it. There has been a very concerted effort to create an atmosphere that everyone believes the official story in 9/11. To question it in unpatriotic, disrespectful to the victims families. I believe it is the exact opposite of this. It is the truest sense of patriotism, our founding fathers made it quite clear they wanted the citizens to rise up against tyrannical governments/leaders. I believe we have a duty to find out exactly what happened that day. In terms of disrespecting the victims, again I believe it to be the exact opposite. If what happened on that was not as presented, again we have a duty to find out who did it. What family member would be angry about wanting to make sure we know everything that happened that day? Even if the official story turned out to be true.

There has also been an effort to paint all conspiracy theorists as "loons" You know tin foil hat wearing cult fanatics. They haven't gotten anything published in a respectable journal. How they can possibly be right? There has been a very concentrated effort with this.

They have an agenda of painting this very and impossible large conspiracy. A clear example...is saying so you've implicated the FBI. When even if one thinks some at the FBI had something to do with it (I personally believe the FBI had next to nothing to do with it) they make it sound like you are saying the whole FBI was in on it.

Lastly and perhaps most importantly, it is very hard for an individual to make that mental leap. They don't want to think about if the official story is not true, what does that mean? It is a very scary thought. It is more comforting to believe the official story of 9/11.

Look through this thread, and other threads you will see examples of all this. This is what I mean about pressure to go against mainstream.

They are loons and it didn't take much effort. They did most of the painting themselves.
 
Ok...what is your source for thinking it is aluminum? I would assume NIST etc right? Isn't that the authority? For the record I question everything and anything regardless of where it comes from. You have people that run experiments heat aluminum up to 1800F it pours out silver. You have people run more experiments showing what NIST said is incorrect, when mixed with normal office supplies it will not blend and the office supplies will fall off. Not creating that orange appearance. These are things I can see with my own eyes. NIST simply says this will happen. Who do you think I should believe?

NOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!
It poured out red hot! That is plain as day! But because it was removed from its heat source, it started to cool and, after pouring out red hot, some gathered on the lip, starting to turn back silver (and I have not brought up how this was pure aluminum, as others have pointed out).

The material flowing from the WTCs was continuously inside a heat source until exiting the building. So all the material you see flowing out at the top of the building was kept at a continuous temperature from inside the fires at between 700-1000C.

This is why I kept grandmastershek's comments in my signature. Your appeal to you tube experiments is outright unscientific, if I feel like being kind, and utterly ridiculous if I don't! If you do not admit to accepting this, then you are disingenuous at best and dishonest at worst!
 
Anyway getting to your point. I never said any such thing about you. Only you know what your real views are.

Yet you seem to know the views of those you've wrongly accused during the course of the thread. I'll bet if there was a YouTube done about Grizzly Bear you'd be all over it.
 
Hey tmd2_1, did you forget about me? Are you retracting any and all claims about remote controlled airplanes, or mysterious Boeing military airplanes so we can scratch Boeing off the list? If not, it can stay and we'll move to the next item.
 
Hey tmd2_1, did you forget about me? Are you retracting any and all claims about remote controlled airplanes, or mysterious Boeing military airplanes so we can scratch Boeing off the list? If not, it can stay and we'll move to the next item.

Yes tmd,deal with this and we can move on to the next one on the list,eliminate them all,and you will twig that you are wrong about this.
 
I see. You're claiming victory based on the fact that there MIGHT have been molten steel.

Golly gosh gee whiz, with arguments like that I'm not sure why a New InvestigationTM hasn't happened already.

"Dear Congress,

I have imagined evidence that, if it existed, would point to 9/11 being an inside job. I don't actually have this evidence, and it might not actually exist. But I'm just saying if it did. I think you should stop everything you're doing and launch an investigation into whether Bush had anything to do with the 9/11 attacks. The evidence I am imagining in my head suggests he was behind it all."

Priceless
 
"Dear Congress,

I have imagined evidence that, if it existed, would point to 9/11 being an inside job. I don't actually have this evidence, and it might not actually exist. But I'm just saying if it did. I think you should stop everything you're doing and launch an investigation into whether Bush had anything to do with the 9/11 attacks. The evidence I am imagining in my head suggests he was behind it all."

Tmd's viewpoint in a nutshell.
 
Hey tmd2_1, did you forget about me? Are you retracting any and all claims about remote controlled airplanes, or mysterious Boeing military airplanes so we can scratch Boeing off the list? If not, it can stay and we'll move to the next item.

Noooo. Boeing is not the only people capable of modifying the A/C
 
I will address you, because I believe you are intelligent, and perhaps open minded. Above all you have been more respectful then 90% of the posters here. So I appreciate that. Look at these previous posts, simply just trying paint an impossible picture, none of it's worth addressing. Whoever wishes can read through the posts and see what I said about who could be or not be involved. I will answer jayheedness on his one question, because I believe it to be a decent question, and will respond when ready.

Anyway getting to your point. I never said any such thing about you. Only you know what your real views are. My point about, against the mainstream...is that it is difficult for someone (anyone) to do so. I had a very hard time with it. There has been a very concerted effort to create an atmosphere that everyone believes the official story in 9/11. To question it in unpatriotic, disrespectful to the victims families. I believe it is the exact opposite of this. It is the truest sense of patriotism, our founding fathers made it quite clear they wanted the citizens to rise up against tyrannical governments/leaders. I believe we have a duty to find out exactly what happened that day. In terms of disrespecting the victims, again I believe it to be the exact opposite. If what happened on that was not as presented, again we have a duty to find out who did it. What family member would be angry about wanting to make sure we know everything that happened that day? Even if the official story turned out to be true.

There has also been an effort to paint all conspiracy theorists as "loons" You know tin foil hat wearing cult fanatics. They haven't gotten anything published in a respectable journal. How they can possibly be right? There has been a very concentrated effort with this.

They have an agenda of painting this very large and impossible conspiracy. A clear example...is saying the FBI has been implicated. When even if one thinks some at the FBI had something to do with it (I personally believe the FBI had next to nothing to do with it) they make it sound like you are saying the whole FBI was in on it.
Lastly and perhaps most importantly, it is very hard for an individual to make that mental leap. They don't want to think about if the official story is not true, what does that mean? It is a very scary thought. It is more comforting to believe the official story of 9/11.

Look through this thread, and other threads you will see examples of all this. This is what I mean about pressure to go against mainstream.

But see? Here is where you go off the tracks. First off, you make no effort to qualify that statement. How many FBI agents would it take? At what level? And no other agents, at other levels, asked any questions?

This is the hand waving we speak of. It shows, and please excuse the word, complete ignorance of 9/11 as a whole. No one would argue that in one individual case, a cover up couldn't occur. It is the TOTALITY of evidence surrounding 9/11 and vast numbers of people involved that makes a 9/11 cover up an impossibility.

Looking at this one claim about the FBI: there were, if I remember correctly, several hundred agents assigned to the investigation. That's several hundred people who investigated 9/11 and concluded it was carried out by al Qaeda. That's several hundred people who have to be "in on it". You did not quantify your "FBI had next to nothing to do with it" number, but this alone renders that comment grossly inaccurate.

And that is only one agency! There were literally dozens of agencies involved in the investigation: CIA, NTSB, NSA, NIST, FEMA, ASCE, NYPD, FDNY, NYPA, state agencies, municipal agencies. And dozens more, totaling, off the top of my head, thousands of investigators!

There were over 10,000 workers on site at GZ. Many experienced demo workers, none of whom witnessed any signs of controlled demolition: either amongst the debris or on the steel itself.

There were 1500 workers on site at Shanksville, who dug up FL 93. Wally Miller himself identified a dozen victims and gathered body parts for DNA analysis.

Several hundred workers were on site at the Pentagon. Again, all victims were identified. Physical evidence was gathered. Qualified engineers examined the damage to the Pentagon. Eyewitnesses are on record relating what they saw. FDR data shows FL 77 hit the building.

A conservative estimate brings the total of people directly involved in the gathering of evidence, and investigation of the crime, to 15,000 people!
15,000!
For anything you say to be true, anything! You HAVE to believe those 15,000 people have kept quiet for 10 years! Thousands of workers at GZ who were abandoned by their govt when they answered their govts call. Thousands who are now dying or who have already died. No reason for them to keep quiet any longer. And nothing out of them!

So again, I do not use the word to merely insult, or for shock value. To in any way limit the amount of people involved in this; to suggest it only takes a few to cover this up, stems from nothing short of ignorance of the subject.
 
Noooo. Boeing is not the only people capable of modifying the A/C

That just shifts it somewhere else. You still have a huge conspiracy. Who are these other people? You keep hitting a brick wall labelled 'lack of evidence'.
 
Noooo. Boeing is not the only people capable of modifying the A/C
Boeing is the only company capable of making a Boeing aircraft. You admit it was Boeing aircraft that crashed that day, yes?

Every Boeing aircraft ever manufactured is accounted for, your theory requires that there had to be 4 more they made that were off the books. This directly implicates Boeing. And the thousands of people it takes to manufacture an airplane.

Shall I just leave Boeing on the list and we'll move on?
 
Boeing is the only company capable of making a Boeing aircraft. You admit it was Boeing aircraft that crashed that day, yes?

Every Boeing aircraft ever manufactured is accounted for, your theory requires that there had to be 4 more they made that were off the books. This directly implicates Boeing. And the thousands of people it takes to manufacture an airplane.

Shall I just leave Boeing on the list and we'll move on?

Watching tmd dig his hole even deeper is very funny.
 
I will address you, because I believe you are intelligent, and perhaps open minded. Above all you have been more respectful then 90% of the posters here. So I appreciate that. Look at these previous posts, simply just trying paint an impossible picture, none of it's worth addressing. Whoever wishes can read through the posts and see what I said about who could be or not be involved. I will answer jayheedness on his one question, because I believe it to be a decent question, and will respond when ready.

Anyway getting to your point. I never said any such thing about you. Only you know what your real views are. My point about, against the mainstream...is that it is difficult for someone (anyone) to do so. I had a very hard time with it. There has been a very concerted effort to create an atmosphere that everyone believes the official story in 9/11. To question it in unpatriotic, disrespectful to the victims families. I believe it is the exact opposite of this. It is the truest sense of patriotism, our founding fathers made it quite clear they wanted the citizens to rise up against tyrannical governments/leaders. I believe we have a duty to find out exactly what happened that day. In terms of disrespecting the victims, again I believe it to be the exact opposite. If what happened on that was not as presented, again we have a duty to find out who did it. What family member would be angry about wanting to make sure we know everything that happened that day? Even if the official story turned out to be true.

There has also been an effort to paint all conspiracy theorists as "loons" You know tin foil hat wearing cult fanatics. They haven't gotten anything published in a respectable journal. How they can possibly be right? There has been a very concentrated effort with this.

They have an agenda of painting this very large and impossible conspiracy. A clear example...is saying the FBI has been implicated. When even if one thinks some at the FBI had something to do with it (I personally believe the FBI had next to nothing to do with it) they make it sound like you are saying the whole FBI was in on it.

Lastly and perhaps most importantly, it is very hard for an individual to make that mental leap. They don't want to think about if the official story is not true, what does that mean? It is a very scary thought. It is more comforting to believe the official story of 9/11.

Look through this thread, and other threads you will see examples of all this. This is what I mean about pressure to go against mainstream.

So the conspiracy is also out to discredit you kooks because you are so great courageous and righteous and people are so scared to believe your bs...

:dl:

And you think that this load of common cult rubbish you just recited was somehow supposed to make you sound less cult like, sane and honorable?

:dl:

WOW
 
Last edited:
So the conspiracy is also out to discredit you kooks because you are so great courageous and righteous and people are so scared to believe your bs...

:dl:

And that load of common cult rubbish you just recited was somehow supposed to make you sound less cult like?

:dl:

WOW

There should be an emoticon of a laughing dog actually dying of laughter. Are these twoofers allowed out on their own?
 
Is it possible to parachute out of one of those jets?

If not, then we must add all the people working at the secret airfield where a remote-controlled 757 took off empty (the alternative of getting an unmanned commercial airliner out of a normal airport is too ridiculous to contemplate).

And I think we've forgotten all the secretaries and P.A.'s working for the conspirators. The Illuminati are notoriously poor typists.

<giggle>
 
We are assuming that tmd knows the meaning of the phrase non sequitor.

It doesn't have sequins on it? This would make sense since 19 Muslims crashing planes is too plain Jane for him, he likes shiny things .
 
Last edited:
I will address you, because I believe you are intelligent, and perhaps open minded. Above all you have been more respectful then 90% of the posters here. So I appreciate that. Look at these previous posts, simply just trying paint an impossible picture, none of it's worth addressing. Whoever wishes can read through the posts and see what I said about who could be or not be involved. I will answer jayheedness on his one question, because I believe it to be a decent question, and will respond when ready.

Anyway getting to your point. I never said any such thing about you. Only you know what your real views are. My point about, against the mainstream...is that it is difficult for someone (anyone) to do so. I had a very hard time with it. There has been a very concerted effort to create an atmosphere that everyone believes the official story in 9/11. To question it in unpatriotic, disrespectful to the victims families. I believe it is the exact opposite of this. It is the truest sense of patriotism, our founding fathers made it quite clear they wanted the citizens to rise up against tyrannical governments/leaders. I believe we have a duty to find out exactly what happened that day. In terms of disrespecting the victims, again I believe it to be the exact opposite. If what happened on that was not as presented, again we have a duty to find out who did it. What family member would be angry about wanting to make sure we know everything that happened that day? Even if the official story turned out to be true.

There has also been an effort to paint all conspiracy theorists as "loons" You know tin foil hat wearing cult fanatics. They haven't gotten anything published in a respectable journal. How they can possibly be right? There has been a very concentrated effort with this.

They have an agenda of painting this very large and impossible conspiracy. A clear example...is saying the FBI has been implicated. When even if one thinks some at the FBI had something to do with it (I personally believe the FBI had next to nothing to do with it) they make it sound like you are saying the whole FBI was in on it.

Lastly and perhaps most importantly, it is very hard for an individual to make that mental leap. They don't want to think about if the official story is not true, what does that mean? It is a very scary thought. It is more comforting to believe the official story of 9/11.

Look through this thread, and other threads you will see examples of all this. This is what I mean about pressure to go against mainstream.

A leap of faith.
 

Back
Top Bottom