dafydd
Banned
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2008
- Messages
- 35,398
Anyway, the author of this is actually a very infrequent poster on this forum and is in the transition into atheism.
Good on him.
Anyway, the author of this is actually a very infrequent poster on this forum and is in the transition into atheism.
I may have missed Marduk's point but I thought he was saying that people can't figure out what God is, so they make God as something like we are, a person.
My reply was that God does not have to be a person, but that some people may never be able to think of God in any other way. Like me, I always say, Him, as if God was a man. I feel it may be disrespectful to say, IT. Just doesn't sound right to me.
I have recently kept the radio off. A year ago I turned my TV off. I just don't like where we are headed. I opened a web page today and some one is saying there are plans for war in Syria and Iran. I'm wondering if there is some way to not have that happen. It may be too late but I guess after the Apocalypse, we could find sanity.
I did not word this how I should have.No. Nor should we. Since I don't think there are any gods, it would be wrong of me to say that there are any, let alone 'one'.
Your 'partisanship' is my 'thirst for truth'. I have no intention of giving it up. Your ways is superstition and delusion and should be shunned.
Hell, no.
If I meant it literally, there would be no "after", that is the point of the literal apocalypse, the end.If you can seriously use the word 'apocalypse', there is no hope for you finding sanity.
I have no interest whatsoever in evangelizing the atheist.
Threats are not tolerated here.
Nonsense. That is precisely what you have been doing since you got here.
You understand that not knowing about things doesn't make them not happen?
That is true , gods are certainly in a place where I can't go without being accused of murder : in others people head.
The problem has never been for us atheist to admit that, the problem has always been the theist which confuse their own voice of reason and morality sense, with gods's will.
Right but this is the religion sub-forum.The cause of the world's trouble is DISENFRANCHISEMENT of entire populations...... Due to GREED
You know like an infinite amount more than me on the subject so I would ask you, isn't there somewhere an ultimate God who all the gods are the children of?Ethnikos, what about the millions of people who believe there are multiple gods? Polytheism is still very popular in many parts of the world. Your insistence that there is really only one would be very insulting to them.
Doesn't make any difference.
Just look at Catholic v Protestant. They believed in the same god and slaughtered each other.
Just look at Sunni v Shia. They believe in the same god and continue to slaughter each other.
Ethnikos - You are posting utter nonsense.
Please find a better hobby.
Thylacines and passenger pigeons - albeit briefly.
What I am throwing out for consideration is an agreement that we have no way to directly know God ourselves except in the vaguest of terms.
Don't.There are plenty of people who believe they have a close, personal relationship with God and know Him intimately.
How are you going to convince them that they are wrong?
Is it possible for people to agree there is one God?
Can people give up partisanship enough to agree that God is
far away somewhere, in a place we can not go, and that God
does no come here and that we can not know His name?
Would the world be a better place if we could?