• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Why God is God Alone, and No One Else

Ethnikos, what about the millions of people who believe there are multiple gods? Polytheism is still very popular in many parts of the world. Your insistence that there is really only one would be very insulting to them.
 
Is it possible for people to agree there is one God?
No.

Can people give up partisanship enough to agree that God is
far away somewhere, in a place we can not go, and that God
does no come here and that we can not know His name?
No, but perhaps we can all agree that that is meaningless.

Would the world be a better place if we could?
Doubtful.
 
Dr. Who wiped out all the other time lords... and the Q is a continium. So there is your one god. Choose which science fiction you like. Oh, and there is only one Force.

It is a joke, man, take it easy.

Oh yeah, and there is also only one Dr. Manhatin. So you have 4 modern mythologies to pick. Enjoy.
 
Last edited:
Is it possible for people to agree there is one God?
What other species is represented by just one specimen ?
:confused:
your problem and that of all monotheists, is that you try to recognise the individual, and ignore the fact that it isn't the individual which is important, but the power that is wielded. basically you're all blind men touching up an elephant
:p
Think of France of the 18th century as being the GLOBAL WORLD of today.

are you trying to make me wet the bed ?
:D
 
Last edited:
Is it possible for people to agree there is one God?

Can people give up partisanship enough to agree that God is
far away somewhere, in a place we can not go, and that God
does no come here and that we can not know His name?

Would the world be a better place if we could?
Doesn't make any difference.

Just look at Catholic v Protestant. They believed in the same god and slaughtered each other.

Just look at Sunni v Shia. They believe in the same god and continue to slaughter each other.
 
I have recently kept the radio off. A year ago I turned my TV off. I just don't like where we are headed. I opened a web page today and some one is saying there are plans for war in Syria and Iran. I'm wondering if there is some way to not have that happen. It may be too late but I guess after the Apocalypse, we could find sanity.

Things have been worse in the past. Ever hear of WWII? The Great Plague? The Ice Ages? I saw that movie Apocalypse,it was awful. The world is a mixture of sane and insane people,it always has been.
 
Yeah, I could see that, and there would be the UN Ambassador for God, seated in the General Assembly. I'm not saying I have the answer but what we have now is just unacceptable.

Unnaceptable to who? I'm fine with it.
 
Atheists in Heaven‏

Fear of death(as mentioned in Hebrews) has most so-called believers in bondage still.

"I can face death bravely, if I know I'm going to heaven" is still fear of death.

"I can face death bravely, if I know I will be resurrected" is still fear of death.

"I live thus and so, so as to live forever" Is immorality.

"I live thus and so, because it is my moral compass" is morality.



Fear of death is self centered, thus religion that caters to that self centered fear is useful only for manipulation of the fearful.



The popular notion of religion is that it is concerned with what happens to you after death, and how to live thus and so so as to have some favorable personal egoic(as in recognition of the self as being the same self) outcome.



"True religion, and undefiled is to do this for the poor, and that for the sick, and something else for someone's benefit." Period.



I personally don't know anything about any resurrection or continuing egoic existence, in fact, I rather doubt it, but I have a strong sense of what "true religion" is. And it will never be a major powerful world religion, it will crush no enemies in battle, or dash the heads of the enemy children against the stones. It will lose at every turn, and never rule the nations with an iron rod.

Just my thoughts on what it could mean to be an atheist.
(note by Ethnikos: Written by someone who does not want to take credit for this at this moment)
 
What other species is represented by just one specimen ?
:confused:
your problem and that of all monotheists, is that you try to recognise the individual, and ignore the fact that it isn't the individual which is important, but the power that is wielded. basically you're all blind men touching up an elephant
I said some people think of God, not as a person.
That (personhood) would be excluded from the definition, but not a clause saying God is not.
 
Shurely shome mishtake there?

This is his response to a show he watched, with that title.
I don't know what the show was, maybe someone here does.
Anyway, the author of this is actually a very infrequent poster on this forum and is in the transition into atheism.
 
Is it possible for people to agree there is one God?


No. Nor should we. Since I don't think there are any gods, it would be wrong of me to say that there are any, let alone 'one'.

Can people give up partisanship enough to agree that God is far away somewhere, in a place we can not go, and that God
does no come here and that we can not know His name?


Your 'partisanship' is my 'thirst for truth'. I have no intention of giving it up. Your ways is superstition and delusion and should be shunned.

Would the world be a better place if we could?


Hell, no.
 
Dr. Who wiped out all the other time lords... and the Q is a continium. So there is your one god. Choose which science fiction you like. Oh, and there is only one Force.

It is a joke, man, take it easy.

Oh yeah, and there is also only one Dr. Manhatin. So you have 4 modern mythologies to pick. Enjoy.
That's a good point. But I prefer fantasy. I want one with giants, unicorns, talking snakes, talking donkeys, witches, a magic Jew who can walk on water. Lots of sex, and give me lots of killing, genocide, infanticide, stoning, burning, just good old fashion iron age hell... wait, what? It's all in the Bible? Damn. :( It's poorly written but the god botherers got all the fantasy themes first.
 
Can we have that again in English please?

I may have missed Marduk's point but I thought he was saying that people can't figure out what God is, so they make God as something like we are, a person.
My reply was that God does not have to be a person, but that some people may never be able to think of God in any other way. Like me, I always say, Him, as if God was a man. I feel it may be disrespectful to say, IT. Just doesn't sound right to me.
 
Embrace the zero evidence god.


If there is no evidence for it, then there is no reason to believe that it exists, and a sane person will live their lives without giving it a second thought.

Why are you wasting our time with this nonsense?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom