seewithyourowneyes
Banned
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2011
- Messages
- 71
what's bad "john" tell me? are some of you afraid of the facts? come on...110 stories turns to flour.....all the concrete turned into flour like powder...from falling onto itself....yeah ok!!! ya ever hear of....
what's bad "john" tell me? are some of you afraid of the facts? come on...110 stories turns to flour.....all the concrete turned into flour like powder...from falling onto itself....yeah ok!!! ya ever hear of....
http://wakeupfromyourslumber.blogspot.com/2006/09/pyroclastic-flows-911s-smoking-gun_13.html
An analysis by Jim Hoffman argues that pyroclastic flows such as the WTC dust cloud must expand primarily by thermal heating.
He reduced the calculated expansion volume by 33%, to account for turbulent mixing with surrounding air. Hoffman shows that even after this correction, the pyroclastic flow from the North Tower collapse expanded to approximately three times the original volume of the tower.
Total squirrel droppings. Not a true statement on the page.
Many respected senior members of the military, intelligence services, and government have expressed significant criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report. Some even allege government complicity in the terrible acts of 9/11. Below are the highly revealing public statements on this vital topic of over 50 prominent public servants with links for verification and further investigation.
The collective voices of these respected senior officials along with over 100 esteemed professors, over 200 pilots and aviation professionals, and hundreds of architects and engineers give credibility to the claim that the 9/11 Commission Report is tragically flawed. These dedicated individuals from across the political spectrum are not irresponsible believers in some 9/11 conspiracy theory. Their sincere concern, backed by decades of service to their country, demonstrate that criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report is not only reasonable and responsible, it is in fact a patriotic duty.
http://www.wanttoknow.info/officialsquestion911commissionreport
On 27 Nov 2002, 411 days after the .......
411 days just like I said....next stupid person want an answer?
You came into this knowing apparently full well what the responses to each of your cliche claims would be, and decided on their credibility. As far as I'm concerned if you're not explaining the basis for pasting over multiple, repeated claims we all heard in 2006 or earlier, then you're not here for much of a legitimate debatedo you have anything new? no none of you do...you just sit there (most of you seem to live on the computer) none of you have answered one question with anything credible...
Another Ignored 9/11 Clue: Bomb Sniffing Dogs Removed From WTC Days Before Attack
Jon Rappoport | June 28 2004
As you’ll see from the Newsday excerpt below, tight security at the Twin Towers in NYC was lightened in the days just before the 9/11 attacks.
What makes the particular removal of bomb-sniffing dogs so important are statements from firemen that they heard bombs going off in the Towers on 9/11, as they were carrying out their rescue operation.
Naturally, if people were planting bombs in the Towers, they would not have wanted those charges to be discovered by trained dogs prior to 9/11.
This matter of the dogs and the statements of firemen about bombs were completely ignored by the 9/11 commission.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2004/062804ignoredclue.htm
do you have anything new? no none of you do...you just sit there (most of you seem to live on the computer) none of you have answered one question with anything credible...
New Truther Guy who post large amounts of **** said:I have absolutely nothing of substance to add to this discussion, so I am going to spam crap from random other places, and then ignore complete and factual responses. I like JAQ'ing off, and spamming the forum
Polly want a cracker?
Polly want a cra......Oh, I see what you did there!! lol.
I'm not going to waste much of my time here...Trust me! I have better things to do!