• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wtc 7

I'm not surprised by the comments that the shrills still leave on these threads.....can any one of you explain WTC 7 47 stories tall and at appx 5:20 pm on 9/11/01 simply falls down onto a neat little pile? huh? come on....two 110 story buildings fall to the ground and turn to dust while falling...? where did all the energy come from to turn just about everything in those buildings into dust? If you want me to believe it was caused by jet fuel and pancakes then you must want me to believe in Jesus Christ too right?

I'm not going to waste much time on here trying to explain what we can all see didn't happen....I will point out what happend...all 3 buildins that day were blown up! simple to see with your own eyes...no explination needed....
 
"Our purpose was to document the event."
"Our purpose was to document the event."

It was said on Israeli TV. That's not evidence? Stating they were there to document the Towers getting hit by jets is not evidence?

"The event" clearly was just the aftermath of the attack. Something people who reside in reality can easily see. There were thousands of people there "documenting" that event.

I'm not surprised by the comments that the shrills still leave on these threads.....can any one of you explain WTC 7 47 stories tall and at appx 5:20 pm on 9/11/01 simply falls down onto a neat little pile? huh? come on....two 110 story buildings fall to the ground and turn to dust while falling...? where did all the energy come from to turn just about everything in those buildings into dust? If you want me to believe it was caused by jet fuel and pancakes then you must want me to believe in Jesus Christ too right?

I'm not going to waste much time on here trying to explain what we can all see didn't happen....I will point out what happend...all 3 buildins that day were blown up! simple to see with your own eyes...no explination needed....

Well the energy comes from gravity. Something we have loads of evidence of. And, no, a belief in Jesus is not necessary to believe in gravity.

And the buildings did not turn to dust. I'm not sure where you got that idea.

If I may ask, what evidence do you find most compelling for the presence of explosives?
 
Samples of the steel for metallurgical properties showed sulfur as an active contaminate. This could have occurred in the ground, or after the fire and before the collapse.
All these steel samples showed Oxygen as an "active contaminate", what's your point?

Oh yes you think the sulphur will come from thermate. Debunked ages ago.

FYI - all steels will contain a small amount of sulphur, which is from the manufacturing process. Sulphur is detrimental to steel - look up "hot shortness" and therefore we go to great lengths to remove it in the steel making process. The addition of Manganese (Mn) produces a stronger, higher melting point sulphide; MnS, than FeS.

You are incorrect about 0.01 percent of all engineers. In most areas (After a 2 to 4 year learning curve) I can beat 70-80% of engineers. Some engineers are so good (in their fields), that I will never beat them.
What at? Rock, paper, scissors?

You're an embarrassment.
 
Without enough of the floor steel reconstructed, the initial conditions for the model are screwed up.
Can you go into more detail? Are you suggesting the lack of physical samples doesn't allow for the required simulations? How familiar are you with the simulation program procured by the NIST with respect to the models they ran?

NIST researchers are government employees working for pathological liars.
Yes, we know already; you have this rage against the machine which acts as a contingency plan should you somehow be convinced that the models are indeed accurate enough.

Then again the steel from the affected floors could have proved sabotage, if it had been recovered.
How do you propose identifying samples from the affected floors without as-built markings available to tell you their locations?

The goal of NIST was to burn up time and to humor their insane bosses.
Of course, this is what most people have come to expect from you; Instead of detailing your problems with the NIST report or the actual merits of the engineering topics, you instead latch to silly political dogma in the hopes that somehow, people will forget that you didn't even read the report.


I'm not going to waste much time on here trying to explain
I don't think you should... you haven't added much. Like Deathdart you're criticizing a comprehensive engineering report. If you think somethings' wrong then it's your onus to demonstrate it, not bluster.
 
Last edited:
You mean mindless ideological diatribes are NOT a substitute for substantive debate? I'm shocked. SHOCKED I say!
 
In this video note the way the Naudet brother gets WTC2 pretty much centre screen . Even when the jet starts to roar behind and above him he is not distracted from his rapt filming of the blank undamaged but momentarily to be struck face of WTC2.He is apparently deaf, very brave and dedicated or knew that the plane was coming. Watch the camera suddenly go rock-steady to catch the critical moments..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUT7yup-YIg&NR=1

If only they made video cameras capable of having some sort of "image stabilization"...

Imagine what would happen if you even had a tripod! The image would be sooooo steady
 
I'm not surprised by the comments that the shrills still leave on these threads.....can any one of you explain WTC 7 47 stories tall and at appx 5:20 pm on 9/11/01 simply falls down onto a neat little pile? huh? come on....two 110 story buildings fall to the ground and turn to dust while falling...? where did all the energy come from to turn just about everything in those buildings into dust? If you want me to believe it was caused by jet fuel and pancakes then you must want me to believe in Jesus Christ too right?

I'm not going to waste much time on here trying to explain what we can all see didn't happen....I will point out what happend...all 3 buildins that day were blown up! simple to see with your own eyes...no explination needed....

Thanks for sharing. Bye.
 
I'm not surprised by the comments that the shrills still leave on these threads.....can any one of you explain WTC 7 47 stories tall and at appx 5:20 pm on 9/11/01 simply falls down onto a neat little pile? huh? come on....two 110 story buildings fall to the ground and turn to dust while falling...? where did all the energy come from to turn just about everything in those buildings into dust? If you want me to believe it was caused by jet fuel and pancakes then you must want me to believe in Jesus Christ too right?

I'm not going to waste much time on here trying to explain what we can all see didn't happen....I will point out what happend...all 3 buildins that day were blown up! simple to see with your own eyes...no explination needed....

The psychiatric ward is on your right. The word is shills,by the way. You must get the truther gibberish right.
 
As I said I don't want to address...what was or was not found at this time. I have done that already, as I have done this already. If you think Gross lying is an unimportant detail I don't know what to tell you. He could have said yes I know there were witnesses, but what they actually saw was ..... he chose to avoid the matter altogether...I wonder why?

I find it funny that you could type that hilited portion without the slightest bit of irony...seeing that you're being completely and totally ignorant of the facts just so you can push some stupid "he lied" agenda.

Let me say it again:

It doesn't matter if Gross lied...it does not alter the fact that 19 terrorists executed 9/11.

You're ducking and dodging like every other truther here. You have no evidence to back up anything you've spewed out. At the first sign of your wrongness, you shift gears and move goalposts. You're entire posting history in this thread is a perfect specimen of truther 101.

You have completely ignored the facts others and I presented to you earlier in this thread, and now you're all upset that people here aren't taking you seriously? Gee, I wonder why.

No one here (besides bill, apparently) is going to take you seriously until you stop playing truther and show some EVIDENCE instead of DELUSIONS.
 
No one here (besides bill, apparently) is going to take you seriously until you stop playing truther and show some EVIDENCE instead of DELUSIONS.

Bill is a troll who will say anything and agree with any truther delusion just to get attention and a reaction.
 
Without enough of the floor steel reconstructed, the initial conditions for the model are screwed up.

When the engine and landing gear go through the building (in the real world), NIST had a very difficult time getting the the model to do that. Most of the time the building (model) collapses immediately. With a proper reconstruction of the floors, they could have made a much more robust model.
...

Either way the lack of floor steel did not allow a model, or argument that would remove all serious doubt.

Even if they had identified the steel from the affected floors, the damage done by the collapse itself might have been difficult to distinguish from the damage done BEFORE the collapse (by the planes and fires).

I love how truthers always have some goalpost that they claim would have clinched it for them "if only they had done that."
 
In this video note the way the Naudet brother gets WTC2 pretty much centre screen . Even when the jet starts to roar behind and above him he is not distracted from his rapt filming of the blank undamaged but momentarily to be struck face of WTC2.He is apparently deaf, very brave and dedicated or knew that the plane was coming. Watch the camera suddenly go rock-steady to catch the critical moments..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUT7yup-YIg&NR=1

1) What's the speed of sound again?

2) Watch all the footage where people DIDN'T get the second impact perfectly, for comparison. Here's a collection titled "All Known Footage of Second Impact."

Given enough people filming a smoking tower for an hour+ some people got bored, some turned off their cameras for a while, some found good spots and just left the camera running, and some, like you link, flail the camera around in random manner and got lucky by pointing the camera in the right direction at the right time. There were probably thousands of videotapes of smoking tower that were turned off or pointed elsewhere before the second impact -- terrible footage we've never seen and never will.
 
.he said there were no witnesses he KNOWS of that said they saw it

so how do you know what he knew at that time?


a clear lie


again how do you know he is lying if you cannot know what he knew at that time??????


"There were witnesses who said they actually saw beams melting...see the second guy in this video (when they start showing witnesses). What else would that be?"

Now show that he knew about those reports or had not forgotten about them at the time of the recording..............

If you cannot, and you can't, you cannot accuse him of lying.:rolleyes:
 
so how do you know what he knew at that time?





again how do you know he is lying if you cannot know what he knew at that time??????




Now show that he knew about those reports or had not forgotten about them at the time of the recording..............

If you cannot, and you can't, you cannot accuse him of lying.:rolleyes:

Truthers don't do evidence and proving things.
 
Say what you want...then it doesn't matter I could say I have a ph.d in physics from MIT, and what would it matter?..You can't prove it one way or the other so why say anything....still waiting for your video by the way.

Yeah you could say that but then we would know you are just lying...MIT has higher standards.

I have 7 o levels including mechanics math and physics, 4 highers including physics and chemistry, and HND in Engineering form a respectable red brick college in Scotland and an MBA from SGBS....oh and 29 years experience in mechanical design.....earning 100K plus a year, I run a small business and I also regularly write articles for the tech press.

I also work for the shape shifting lizards in my spare time (they are nice guys once you have persuaded them not to eat you!) and we are downloading kiddie porn to your computer as you read this. Expect a visit from the authorities any day:D if that doesn't work I'm afraid we will have to call in the wet squad.:rolleyes:
 
I've bumped into a few rock stars in my time. I once appeared in a pageant with Peter Gabriel. that's another story,back on topic. What was it again? Truthers are much of a muchness ,it gets hazy now and again.


I once shook hands with a British Prime Minster! Sir Alec Douglas Hume.I was only a kid at the time but thats when I knew I would be joining the NWO, Illuminati and shape shifting Lizards!

Oh and Eric Idle once signed a book for me and I saw Peter Ustinov in a corridor at O'hare.
 
Yeah you could say that but then we would know you are just lying...MIT has higher standards.

I have 7 o levels including mechanics math and physics, 4 highers including physics and chemistry, and HND in Engineering form a respectable red brick college in Scotland and an MBA from SGBS....oh and 29 years experience in mechanical design.....earning 100K plus a year, I run a small business and I also regularly write articles for the tech press.

I also work for the shape shifting lizards in my spare time (they are nice guys once you have persuaded them not to eat you!) and we are downloading kiddie porn to your computer as you read this. Expect a visit from the authorities any day:D if that doesn't work I'm afraid we will have to call in the wet squad.:rolleyes:

And tmd2_1 can operate a mouse and a keyboard. What chance have the real engineers got against that sort of knowledge?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom