• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
tmd2_1 said:
Did you not read when I said those photos were apart of the DOD list (which was released in order) that photo was noticeably absent and clearly very early in the set. If you don't want to believe me contact the photographer. Do you really think he would let someone publish photos attributed to him, when there not his? I mean I know he can't stop them but he could sue them, especially a photo as important as this one could be.
Click to expand...
Why do you keep pointing out the photo was " noticeably absent" when you have no idea how many were actually absent?

The DOD has never released a picture of me, although hundreds exist (even ones by government photographers).............:eek:
 
Last edited:
DGM said:
Why do you keep pointing out the photo was " noticeably absent" when you have no idea how many were actually absent?

The DOD has never released a picture of me.............:eek:
Click to expand...

Yeah...I'd be willing to bet you didn't go on TV with crime scene evidence from the biggest crime in U.S history either. Great reasoning you have there.
 
tmd2_1 said:
Yeah...I'd be willing to bet you didn't go on TV with crime scene evidence from the biggest crime in U.S history either. Great reasoning you have there.
Click to expand...
Naturally the point sailed over your head but, you believed the CIT timeline (and suspicion) without question.

:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
tmd2_1 said:
Doesn't matter what I believe...all that matters is if I said no one said they saw her I would be a liar.
Click to expand...

I'm still wondering how you recognize molten steel at sight. I worked in a small foundry for a year, where did you gain your experience with molten metals?

One of these is molten steel. Which one?






 
Believe what you want...if the FBI said they have no hard evidence against bin laden...to the point where wasn't listed for 9/11 on the top 10 list for it..
Click to expand...

Well done! That statement totally proves it's physically possible for explosives to have survived the impacts and massive fires.

I'm completely convinced now, that tons of previously unknown explosives were planted in 4 buildings and in some also unknown fashion were detonated, yet did not cause a collapse for another hour in the case of 2 110 story buildings.

Crap. Tons, or was it just enough to get momentum going? I lose track. Lotsa weed when I was younger.

And the statement also proves that there really weren't aircraft at all! They were holograms of a previously unknown type that can mimic a 757 travelling at 500 miles per hour, waiting for space beams to blow thousands of tons of steel into foam. It also proves a pyroclastic cloud actually doesn't burn human skin after all!


(or not)
 
NoahFence said:
Well done! That statement totally proves it's physically possible for explosives to have survived the impacts and massive fires.

I'm completely convinced now, that tons of previously unknown explosives were planted in 4 buildings and in some also unknown fashion were detonated, yet did not cause a collapse for another hour in the case of 2 110 story buildings.

Crap. Tons, or was it just enough to get momentum going? I lose track. Lotsa weed when I was younger.

And the statement also proves that there really weren't aircraft at all! They were holograms of a previously unknown type that can mimic a 757 travelling at 500 miles per hour, waiting for space beams to blow thousands of tons of steel into foam. It also proves a pyroclastic cloud actually doesn't burn human skin after all!


(or not)
Click to expand...

Not to mention the passengers who either agreed to disappear or were 'removed' by the evil guv'ment. Truthers never address that one.
 
tmd2_1 said:
Hence why I don't want to give any information about myself...I'm not sure if it's a threat or a joke...either way I'm glad to see I am infuriating you.
Click to expand...

Fun in the desert with a Barrett and Tannerite = threat? you do live in a funny world.

You again reference facts not in evidence - your not important enough to annoy me, let alone infuriate me.
 
BStrong said:
Fun in the desert with a Barrett and Tannerite = threat? you do live in a funny world.

You again reference facts not in evidence - your not important enough to annoy me, let alone infuriate me.
Click to expand...

As if the secret agents couldn't track him down by his IP address. He just doesn't want to admit that he has no qualification that enable him to comment meaningfully on this subject. Youtube suffices for him.
 
dafydd said:
I'm still wondering how you recognize molten steel at sight. I worked in a small foundry for a year, where did you gain your experience with molten metals?

One of these is molten steel. Which one?

[URL]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_234094e35b08e2c83a.jpg[/URL]

[URL]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_234094e35b09c8bc55.jpg[/URL]

[URL]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_234094e35b0bcb4497.jpg[/URL]
[URL]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/234094e35b0cd2d88f.jpg[/URL]
Click to expand...
I'll take a guess that image number two is steel. Based on my experience, I have a 25% chance of being correct. :)
 
dafydd said:
I'm still wondering how you recognize molten steel at sight. I worked in a small foundry for a year, where did you gain your experience with molten metals?

One of these is molten steel. Which one?

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_234094e35b08e2c83a.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_234094e35b09c8bc55.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_234094e35b0bcb4497.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/234094e35b0cd2d88f.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

I believe the last not 100% sure though...you're missing the point...one more time...what those witnesses saw or did not see is not important to whether he lied or not...he said there were no witnesses he knows of that said they saw it...a clear lie....There were witnesses who said they actually saw beams melting...see the second guy in this video (when they start showing witnesses). What else would that be?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fs_ogSbQFbM
 
tmd2_1 said:
I don't want to give my qualifications not because I am ashamed of them..far...very far from it...I would like to not give any information for people to try and find out who I am.
Click to expand...
:dl:

If you honestly believe that people can work out who you are from your qualifications then you are either paranoid, hold very, very specific qualifications or you think a qualification is something like "I'm the lead singer of Radiohead".

Here's mine;

Cycling proficiency test.
10m and 25m swimming certificates.
9 GCSEs
3 A Levels - Maths, Physics Chemistry
Degree - Metallurgy/Materials Engineering
15 years experience as a materials engineer in aerospace - specialising in titanium and aluminium alloys, material property data.

Who am I?
 
BStrong said:
Fun in the desert with a Barrett and Tannerite = threat? you do live in a funny world.

You again reference facts not in evidence - your not important enough to annoy me, let alone infuriate me.
Click to expand...

Terrific..yet you find the need to reply to me.
 
Sunstealer said:
:dl:

If you honestly believe that people can work out who you are from your qualifications then you are either paranoid, hold very, very specific qualifications or you think a qualification is something like "I'm the lead singer of Radiohead".

Here's mine;

Cycling proficiency test.
10m and 25m swimming certificates.
9 GCSEs
3 A Levels - Maths, Physics Chemistry
Degree - Metallurgy/Materials Engineering
15 years experience as a materials engineer in aerospace - specialising in titanium and aluminium alloys, material property data.

Who am I?
Click to expand...

Say what you want...then it doesn't matter I could say I have a ph.d in physics from MIT, and what would it matter?..You can't prove it one way or the other so why say anything....still waiting for your video by the way.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom