Richard Gage Blueprint for Truth Rebuttals on YouTube by Chris Mohr

Status
Not open for further replies.
Clayton Moore said:
Overwhelmingly, most of the calculations a person makes in their lifetime are made with their eyes.
Click to expand...

Could that contribute to your failure to understand what happen on 911? Instead of using math, physics and engineering you used your eyes? Do you see a problem with not using some tools combined with science? Are you anti-science? Does the TLAR method always work for most people? Why has it failed for you and 911 truth?

Chris is doing a good job, what do you think? Are their specific things you can refute using evidence?
 
Clayton Moore said:
Overwhelmingly, most of the calculations a person makes in their lifetime are made with their eyes.
Click to expand...

I've never heard anything so stupid in my life. So the people who designed and built the Space Shuttle all had 20-20 vision? No paperwork? How old were you when you dropped out of school,or are you supposed to be attending a school?
 
Last edited:
mrkinnies said:
NIST said the building above the floors 7-14 fell downward as a single unit in the global collapse stage. The visual evidence shows that to be symmetrical.
Click to expand...

Lie one. It is clearly not symmetrical despite the superficial APPEARANCE that is was from one side.

[/QWhat more can I say if all you want to do is deny these two facts. I might as well talk to a cat or a dog.
Click to expand...

Lie two, at most only one of those is a fact. And yes you might as well talk to a cat or dog as you will make no more sense to them than you will to us. The dog might however find you amusing.....we and the cat would not.:sour:
 
Last edited:
alienentity said:
Here's a longer clip of the Banfield video. Note that she mentions talking to officers who say they expect the building to come down next, 'there's no way it's going to be recovered and there's no way they can stabilize it'.

Again, you hear a growing rumble (actually before Ashley notices it) which continues as the building falls. So why can we hear the building fall, but not explode, if in fact there were explosions?
There's no plausible scenario for explosions at that time. Sorry truthers, it's a fail for you.

Click to expand...

Thats game, set, and match
 
I'm off on holiday - will speak to you all soon.

Perhaps one of you could answer the issue of how the core and floors collapsed downward without pulling the outer walls inwards or how the asymmetrical collapse of the core could pull the outer walls downward as a single unit.

Also, please describe what NIST means by the exterior walls having become a shell which implies the outer walls stopped being an inextricable part of the building and began to function as a separate stand-alone structure.
 
Last edited:
mrkinnies said:
I'm off on holiday - will speak to you all soon.

Perhaps one of you could answer the issue of how the core and floors collapsed downward without pulling the outer walls inwards or how the asymmetrical collapse of the core could pull the outer walls downward as a single unit.

Also, please describe what NIST means by the exterior walls having become a shell which implies the outer walls stopped being an inextricable part of the building and began to function as a separate stand-alone structure.
Click to expand...
What is the point, you can't figure out 19 terrorists did 911, so you make up a fantasy world. Like you have been on vacation for nearly 10 years. How does quibbling about NIST help Gage? When will you publish your findings in an engineering journal? What is your point, and what are your findings? Your big picture and do you understand Gage is spreading false information for the purpose of collecting money to make a living and never intends to do much more than take money? There were no blast effects on 911, your explosives theory is a fantasy based on zero evidence. You are just in time for 10 years of failure from 911. When will Gage's fraud peak out on donations and people realize he is scamming them? Do you have your work prepared for publication?
 
mrkinnies said:
I've done a lot of recording in studios although as a drummer, .
Click to expand...

That explains a a lot

How do you tell if the stage is level?
The drummer is drooling from both sides of his mouth.

How can you tell a drummer's at the door?
The knocking speeds up and he doesn't know when to come in.

What do you call a drummer that breaks up with his girlfriend?
Homeless.

Why do guitarists put drumsticks on the dash of their car?
So they can park in the handicapped spot.

What do you call a guy who hangs around with musicians?
A drummer.

I once asked a drummer how to spell "Mississippi".
He said, "the river or the state?"
 
mrkinnies said:
I'm off on holiday - will speak to you all soon.

Perhaps one of you could answer the issue of how the core and floors collapsed downward without pulling the outer walls inwards or how the asymmetrical collapse of the core could pull the outer walls downward as a single unit.

Also, please describe what NIST means by the exterior walls having become a shell which implies the outer walls stopped being an inextricable part of the building and began to function as a separate stand-alone structure.
Click to expand...

Moment frames, mrkinnies. Designwise they ARE a unit, and they attempted to act as a unit. Is that really so surprising to you?
 
RedIbis said:
If I see a bad argument and it's worth noting I comment on it. I don't have additional responsibility to your monolithic Twoofer entity.
Click to expand...

Disbelief said:
Well, we know that is not true since you have repeatedly posted in threads where truthers use hypotheticals and you do not call them out. As for the part I bolded above, please quote me as using the term Twoofer, and also point me to where I made any mention of some monolithic entity in the post you quoted. I used the term truther to represent individuals making arguments, not as some monolith.
Click to expand...

So Red, are you going to address this? Since you try to act like the stickler to detail, I would think you would want to clear up why you mischaracterized what I said.
 
mrkinnies said:
I'm off on holiday - will speak to you all soon.

Perhaps one of you could answer the issue of how the core and floors collapsed downward without pulling the outer walls inwards or how the asymmetrical collapse of the core could pull the outer walls downward as a single unit.

Also, please describe what NIST means by the exterior walls having become a shell which implies the outer walls stopped being an inextricable part of the building and began to function as a separate stand-alone structure.
Click to expand...

www.wtc.nist.org

You're welcome.
 
sheeplesnshills said:
This is science and engineering.....not catching a ball:rolleyes:
Click to expand...
In a profession like engineering his statements would lead to losing the job. Stupid errors in that field range between million-dollar mistakes to loss of life. Not things a professional wants, or needs in his resume.
 
mrkinnies said:
Can you tell what the dB range of a sound is at varying distances using your own experience? Also, can you prove that the explosions would have led to that decibel reading? You and I only have NIST's word that the expected level of reading for a cutting charge is 130-140dB at 0.5 miles. They do not, for example, distinguish between a cutting charge detonated in a space free of immediate obstructions (as is the case in many CDs because the outer walls or cladding are removed) versus one detonated inside a building with intact windows (as most of the lower storey windows in WTC7 were).
Click to expand...
130-14dB is comparable to a rock concert. No, it's comparable to literally standing in right in front of the speaker bank at a rock concert. We are talking hearing loss here. The hypothetical explosives weren't heard or recorded by people who were standing just far enough from 7 not to get hit by debris, and by cameras much closer than a half-mile. And remember, the half mile volume would be after a half-mile of any attenuation. It would be even louder for anyone on the ground. No shattered windows. No barotrauma. No explosives. If you want data on explosive volume, find and present it yourself.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom