Richard Gage Blueprint for Truth Rebuttals on YouTube by Chris Mohr

Status
Not open for further replies.
bill smith said:
I wonder where the helicopter footage of the collapse of WTC7 got to ? I mean according to the OCT they knew well in advance that it was going down. I would have expected loads of footage like that. What do you think Chris ?
Click to expand...
Why would you expect that? So you think they should have hovered around in all the smoke and dust so they might be able to get a view of it collapsing?

So Bill, How many aircraft were in the air when it collapsed (trick question)?
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
I wonder where the helicopter footage of the collapse of WTC7 got to ? I mean according to the OCT they knew well in advance that it was going down. I would have expected loads of footage like that. What do you think Chris ?
Click to expand...

Do you know it exists?

We have plenty of footage of the building collapsing. (no explosives vaporising steel and concrete heard in any of them of course)

And of course they knew it was going to come down, thats what the firefighters said. Also, its far easier to set up a camera in front of 7 rather than having a helicopter hover around one building for hours.
 
Last edited:
I donl;t know of any helicopter footage of other sides of Building 7... if there had been, there was so much smoke on the other side a lot would have been invisible anyway.
 
chrismohr said:
I donl;t know of any helicopter footage of other sides of Building 7... if there had been, there was so much smoke on the other side a lot would have been invisible anyway.
Click to expand...

As a somewhat impartial person in the 9/11 conundrum,or a least someone who is trying to be you must be alarmed and concerned at this glaring omission in the public record . It's not reasonable to assume that government or news agencies on a day like 9/11 would not have filmed the expected collapse of WTC7 from helicopters on all sides. Or from the rooves of nearby tall buildings. The air was more or less clear on three sides.

We would have lots of valuable insight into the events, such as the collapse of the Penthouse that we currently do not have.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
It's not reasonable to assume that government or news agencies on a day like 9/11 would not have filmed the expected collapse of WTC7 from helicopters on all sides. Or from the rooves of nearby tall buildings.
Click to expand...

Actually it is because no one was allowed to fly & the area around WTC 7 had been evacuated. I think the govt was more concerned with figuring out what happened and if there were more threats. I would imagine people were more concerned with the horror & finding survivors than an empty building a cult has obsessed over for the last 10 years. In fact, why didn't you call someone & tell them that they should be doing that? Where were you on 9/11 & what are you trying to hide?
 
Last edited:
grandmastershek said:
Actually it is because no one was allowed to fly & the area around WTC 7 had been evacuated. I think the govt was more concerned with figuring out what happened and if there were more threats. I would imagine people were more concerned with the horror & finding survivors than an empty building a cult has obsessed over for the last 10 years. In fact, why didn't you call someone & tell them that they should be doing that? Where were you on 9/11 & what are you trying to hide?
Click to expand...

Are you saying that there were no choppers in the air around ground zero shortly before and after WTC7 went down ?
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
As a somewhat impartial person in the 9/11 conundrum,or a least someone who is trying to be you must be alarmed and concerned at this glaring omission in the public record . It's not reasonable to assume that government or news agencies on a day like 9/11 would not have filmed the expected collapse of WTC7 from helicopters on all sides. Or from the rooves of nearby tall buildings. The air was more or less clear on three sides.

We would have lots of valuable insight into the events, such as the collapse of the Penthouse that we currently do not have.
Click to expand...

so they allowed dozens of videos of the WTC 1 and 2 but deliberately censored Wt7 which no one gave a rats behind about.......yes that make perfect sense in twoofer world!
 
Controversial Video 17: How Big is this Conspiracy Anyway?

Here's one of my most controversial YouTube rebuttals of Gage's Blueprint for Truth:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iya9P5TRd-0

The question Gage and I debated March 6 was, would it be possible to have secret preparations for a controlled demolition of the magnitude of the 3 destructions of the WTC Buildings? Here I expand the question and ask, how many people do YOU think are in on this conspiracy? Some people have told me, "tens of thousands!"

On the other extreme, Richard Gage says this whole controlled demolition thing is not a conspiracy theory!!:eek:
But he also casts suspicion over literally hundreds of people in his video. How many people do YOU think it would take to engineer this whole thing, top to bottom, start to finish????
 
bill smith said:
As a somewhat impartial person in the 9/11 conundrum,or a least someone who is trying to be you must be alarmed and concerned at this glaring omission in the public record . It's not reasonable to assume that government or news agencies on a day like 9/11 would not have filmed the expected collapse of WTC7 from helicopters on all sides. Or from the rooves of nearby tall buildings. The air was more or less clear on three sides.

We would have lots of valuable insight into the events, such as the collapse of the Penthouse that we currently do not have.
Click to expand...
Bill, an FDNY first responder told me personally that he and others were putting all their available resources into rescue work that horrible afternoon. He was there. They had evacuated Building 7, cleared out a collapse zone to protect the surviving first responders, and were focusing on life and death matters. Honestly, it doesn't stir up suspicion for me that there aren't more videos.
 
bill smith said:
Are you saying that there were no choppers in the air around ground zero shortly before and after WTC7 went down ?
Click to expand...

Dude, seriously. You didn't come off too well on the discussion about the Gage event in the UK. You might want to try to go in "rehabilitate your reputation mode" here.
 
chrismohr said:
Bill, an FDNY first responder told me personally that he and others were putting all their available resources into rescue work that horrible afternoon. He was there. They had evacuated Building 7, cleared out a collapse zone to protect the surviving first responders, and were focusing on life and death matters. Honestly, it doesn't stir up suspicion for me that there aren't more videos.
Click to expand...

There were many other professional organisations there who would almost certainly have filmed the collapse from choppers Chris. News organisations gather news for instance and would have done their job. Also government technical bureaus to record the event for the record and future forensic studies.

As I said to assume none of this happened is unreasobable in my opinion.

But each to his own judgement. I suggest that you hone your skills in answering this question for future public debates.
 
chrismohr said:
Here's one of my most controversial YouTube rebuttals of Gage's Blueprint for Truth:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iya9P5TRd-0

The question Gage and I debated March 6 was, would it be possible to have secret preparations for a controlled demolition of the magnitude of the 3 destructions of the WTC Buildings? Here I expand the question and ask, how many people do YOU think are in on this conspiracy? Some people have told me, "tens of thousands!"

On the other extreme, Richard Gage says this whole controlled demolition thing is not a conspiracy theory!!:eek:
But he also casts suspicion over literally hundreds of people in his video. How many people do YOU think it would take to engineer this whole thing, top to bottom, start to finish????
Click to expand...

Hypotheticals do not make good debate topics. You have some 17 videos. You might consider jettisoning those based on speculation and focus entirely on those topics which can be addressed by accessing known evidence and research.
 
RedIbis said:
Hypotheticals do not make good debate topics. You have some 17 videos. You might consider jettisoning those based on speculation and focus entirely on those topics which can be addressed by accessing known evidence and research.
Click to expand...
Maybe Gage should do this too.


:rolleyes:
 
Rebutting the "Silver Bullet" of Building 7's freefall collapse

Hi all,

I still have a couple nontechnical rebuttal videos to go, but here is one I'm really proud of: at last... an explanation of how 8 stories of the north perimeter wall of Building 7 could have come down at freefall. Doesn't that mean no resistance? Wouldn't that require controlled demolition? That idea carries a lot of traction for the 9/11 Truth movement, but does the science support that commonsense assertion? Watch this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PkbDyAJuirg

The meat of the technical explanation starts around halfway through. I don't know of any better layman's explanation (though as much as I tried to simplify, it is still a bit complex). I owe a big debt of gratitude to a lot of the JREF people who gave me great answers to this central question over the past several months.
 
bill smith said:
There were many other professional organisations there who would almost certainly have filmed the collapse from choppers Chris. News organisations gather news for instance and would have done their job. Also government technical bureaus to record the event for the record and future forensic studies.

As I said to assume none of this happened is unreasobable in my opinion.

But each to his own judgement. I suggest that you hone your skills in answering this question for future public debates.
Click to expand...

If you have some of this video produce it. Or if you have evidence of helicopters filming then produce that too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom