Ed Pentagon - TruthMakesPeace

AJM8125 said:
Yes. JohnG once again demonstrates his uncanny ability to translate Trutherese into a language understood by people who know what the **** they're talking about.
Click to expand...

The more correct terminology may have been FL300? Or would that have confused the issue?
 
000063 said:
Just for TMP's benefit, how long does a standard maintenance inspection for a 767 take?
Click to expand...

That would be dependent on what type of aircraft we are talking about, and what type of maintenance check we are performing. Minor maintenance checks are usually done over night at the gate, while major maintenance checks are done at a maintenance facility.
A MOH on a B747 could take about a month and cost up to 2 Million dollars. The aircraft manufacturer and the FAA set the maintenance schedules for various types of aircraft, and these schedules are updated during the life of the aircraft.
I am not a technician, so I would not be able to describe the various maintenance checks without being wrong.

BTW, the 1500 man/hours required to install the remote control system in the B707/720B did not include the preparation time, removal of non-require aircraft systems.
 
fess said:
That would be dependent on what type of aircraft we are talking about, and what type of maintenance check we are performing. Minor maintenance checks are usually done over night at the gate, while major maintenance checks are done at a maintenance facility.
A MOH on a B747 could take about a month and cost up to 2 Million dollars. The aircraft manufacturer and the FAA set the maintenance schedules for various types of aircraft, and these schedules are updated during the life of the aircraft.
I am not a technician, so I would not be able to describe the various maintenance checks without being wrong.

BTW, the 1500 man/hours required to install the remote control system in the B707/720B did not include the preparation time, removal of non-require aircraft systems.
Click to expand...
Thank you. So their either would've had to do hundreds of man-hours of work overnight, or work around a more major checkup to stealthily replace the plane's entire computer system.

#000063bookmark
 
000063 said:
Thank you. So their either would've had to do hundreds of man-hours of work overnight, or work around a more major checkup to stealthily replace the plane's entire computer system.

#000063bookmark
Click to expand...

Even if this aircraft had flown enough cycles to require a class D maintenance, as some airlines call it, the installation of a system to remotely control the aircraft would have been impossible. Each step of the maintenance schedule has to be inspected and signed off by the maintenance supervisor and an FAA inspector.
 
fess said:
Even if this aircraft had flown enough cycles to require a class D maintenance, as some airlines call it, the installation of a system to remotely control the aircraft would have been impossible. Each step of the maintenance schedule has to be inspected and signed off by the maintenance supervisor and an FAA inspector.
Click to expand...

Not when you're doing souper sekrit black ops using nano-bot technology and military grade hardware(so classified it's kill before reading stuff).
 
tsig said:
Not when you're doing souper sekrit black ops using nano-bot technology and military grade hardware(so classified it's kill before reading stuff).
Click to expand...

I didn’t want to mention that stuff for fear that the micro chip the military implanted in my skull might burst and cause me to bleed to death internally. :)
 
DGM said:
I love the "maintenance log" bit. What is the log code for "prepare plane for remote take over"? I wonder what he would look for if he saw the logs? I suppose any work would be "suspicion".
Click to expand...

Don't be silly, of course the NWO can make "Prepare plane for remote takeover" sound like routine maintenance!

Look:



99024de730b7c316a.png
 
TruthMakesPeace said:
The Cabin Outflow Valve (COV) could have been modified to be forced open by a Remote Control (RC) device, and should have been examined in the wreckage (if recognizable). Loss of air pressure would suffocate the crew, passengers, and duped hijackers (who may have thought it was a regular hijacking) at high altitude (30000 fasl), along with hypothermia.
Click to expand...

The Outflow Valve takes around 30 seconds to cycle from full closed to open and vice versa. That will not suffice for your rapid decompression idea. There are two motors that run the valve and they are modulated by the automated pressure controllers and monitered by the airplanes warning computers. The only way to "RC it" would be trick the said controllers and warning system, then bypass the manual valve controls in the cockpit. You'll do all that just to make the pilots don their O2 masks. A wasted effort IMO.


Enhanced RC of the Flight Management System (FMS) could navigate the planes to hit their target buildings. Flight Data Recorders (FDRs) record cabin pressure, but were "not found" or had "no useful data".
Click to expand...
Not true, on both counts.

- AA77s and UA93s FDR are available for download.
- FMS isn't a magic system - just a fancy acronym for "computers fly more cheaply than humans". To get the airplanes to hit small targets, they'd have needed much more equipment than the stock autopilot and FMS. If the NWO made me the "mad scientist" of a remote hijacking, my airplane of choice would be an A330. It's a software driven jet whereas the Boeing 757/767 are mechanical and they would be my last choices. Even the fly-by-wire 777 has zero software flight laws, which would make an e-hijack completely impossible.
 
Last edited:
dafydd said:
If the 911 conspiracy fraternity do not believe the official story (aka reality) then they must have another story in mind. I want to know what their various stories are but none of them will confide in me.
Click to expand...

My point is that it is anathema for them to do so.

ALL they really must know is that the official story is not correct. That is simply all that matters to them. Now of course some, see the CiT for instance, will in fact concoct a fiction that partially satisfies your desire.
 
jaydeehess said:
My point is that it is anathema for them to do so.

ALL they really must know is that the official story is not correct. That is simply all that matters to them. Now of course some, see the CiT for instance, will in fact concoct a fiction that partially satisfies your desire.
Click to expand...

None of them have presented even a fiction to me.
 
Childlike Empress said:
Calling me kid and child won't strenghten your blatant lack of arguments. It's in plain sight: No 757 hit the Pentagon. I'll leave you with April Gallup's testimony - you know I don't play your games anymore. Maybe cicorp will show up.

Click to expand...

April Gallops "testimony" (found to be cynical delusions and fantasy) or aircraft parts, Body parts of passengers and crew with matching DNA, passengers personal effects..............hmmmmmmmmmm what a difficult choice to make
:rolleyes:
 
Travis said:
You know, except for all the burned people still strapped into their seats that the firefighters find.
Click to expand...

Once again we encounter truthers failing to give this topic the respect it deserves. This topic deserves better than to be turned into a meaningless little hobby.
 
dafydd said:
If the 911 conspiracy fraternity do not believe the official story (aka reality) then they must have another story in mind. I want to know what their various stories are but none of them will confide in me.
Click to expand...

I've found that too. It seems their mental illness allows them to formulate a belief that something is a conspiracy but not allow them to actually specify what that conspiracy was. Its more just a "feeling" not an intellectually thought out conclusion. So everything presented as evidence that it wasn't still "feels" wrong and everything, no matter how silly, that confirms their suspicions "feels" right. This bias can even extend to them creating faked evidence because again, they "feel" or "know" that its right even though they, themselves, faked it.:boggled:
 
Craig4 said:
Once again we encounter truthers failing to give this topic the respect it deserves. This topic deserves better than to be turned into a meaningless little hobby.
Click to expand...

The truthers seem to treat the whole thing like a video game instead of a tragedy involving real people. Sickening.
 
sheeplesnshills said:
I've found that too. It seems their mental illness allows them to formulate a belief that something is a conspiracy but not allow them to actually specify what that conspiracy was. Its more just a "feeling" not an intellectually thought out conclusion. So everything presented as evidence that it wasn't still "feels" wrong and everything, no matter how silly, that confirms their suspicions "feels" right. This bias can even extend to them creating faked evidence because again, they "feel" or "know" that its right even though they, themselves, faked it.:boggled:
Click to expand...

I have never meet a truther over here in Europe. How many active truthers are there in the USA? I get the impression that they are a very endangered species,with very few examples left.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom