Unbelievable the attack/hate articles coming out on Ron Paul

[dvictr]

the NWO is in overdrive

google/bing/altavista/netscape/askjeeves ;p Ron Paul for News results and every big government/ neocon shill writer is taking a shot.

how is such a marginal fringe candidate drawing this much attention. if he is no threat to gather more than a few percentage points of the vote.. why is the need to publish countless articles?

like him or hate him, consider his positions radical or not.. you cannot deny his popularity/support is growing

 

[leftysergeant]

like him or hate him, consider his positions radical or not.. you cannot deny his popularity/support is growing

Yeah, the bloody drongo has attracted a rather large and enthusiastic following among assorted nutbars marginal to and somewhat hazardous to society.

The twoofer shock troopers of WeAreChange adore the lunatic.

Outright racists and Operation Rescue terrorists are not the least bit afraid of what will happen to them if we are stupid enough to make him POTUS.

Sorry, but he just has too much offensive sludge from too many creepy, shadowy sources on his shoes.

 

[Kthulhut Fhtagn]

the NWO is in overdrive

Conspiracy is that way ---->

google/bing/altavista/netscape/askjeeves ;p Ron Paul for News results and every big government/ neocon shill writer is taking a shot.

Gee, it'd be nice if you gave us an example of what you considered an unreasonable focus on him. You know, other than your assurances.

how is such a marginal fringe candidate drawing this much attention. if he is no threat to gather more than a few percentage points of the vote.. why is the need to publish countless articles?

For the same reason Trump did, it brings in readers.

like him or hate him, consider his positions radical or not.. you cannot deny his popularity/support is growing

Libertarians/An-Caps assured us of his "growing support" in the last election. Why should anyone take Paul seriously this time around?

 

[applecorped]

I miss Ross Perot.

 

[mysteronyx]

I wonder what changes he could actually make as president?

 

[Kthulhut Fhtagn]

I wonder what changes he could actually elicit as president?

Nothing, really. If he somehow managed to sneak in I doubt congress would let him get away with too much. Especially once his popularity starts slipping when he targets welfare programs. He's managed to stay in congress as long as he has because he's a fringe representative of one district, and he still manages to funnel pork to them while maintaining his status as a libertarian. Case in point, my representative ran for reelection and won while under investigation for committing fraud.

 

[Tricky]

the NWO is in overdrive

google/bing/altavista/netscape/askjeeves ;p Ron Paul for News results and every big government/ neocon shill writer is taking a shot.

how is such a marginal fringe candidate drawing this much attention. if he is no threat to gather more than a few percentage points of the vote.. why is the need to publish countless articles?

like him or hate him, consider his positions radical or not.. you cannot deny his popularity/support is growing

Oh yes, his popularity is growing, and not undeservedly so. I have to admit that it is refreshing to see a politician so open about his opinions, and damn the torpedos. I think that resonates with a lot of Americans. But what doesn't resonate with them are the opinions themselves. Yes, he has a strong, dedicated following. No, he won't win the nomination or even come close. But he's more palatable to me than a whole lot of the GOP field. I'd rather have him than Palin or Trump or Gingrich or Huckabee or Santorium or Bachman or... just about anybody that the Repubs are putting forth. I may even vote for him in the primary.

But he won't win. He is way too far removed from Mainstream America to have any sort of chance.

 

[Alt+F4]

how is such a marginal fringe candidate drawing this much attention. if he is no threat to gather more than a few percentage points of the vote.. why is the need to publish countless articles?

His wacky politics make him an easy target.

you cannot deny his popularity/support is growing

You cannot deny his age is growing. He would be 77 at inauguration. Even with wacky politics aside, sorry, it's not going to happen.

 

[dvictr]

Gee, it'd be nice if you gave us an example of what you considered an unreasonable focus on him. You know, other than your assurances.

http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionl...n.html?cid=6a00d8341c7de353ef01538e7c84dd970b

actually re reading the article i think it might be a troll/ poe

 

[Sword_Of_Truth]

Ron Pauls racism and anti-semitism would do him in long before the primaries are done.

Certain posters here may see KluKKers hiding behind every tree stump, but in the real world, they just aren't numerous enough to sustain a candidate who is openly sympathetic towards them.

Herr Doktor Ron Paul schmoozing with
Stormfront.org founder Don Black and son Derek Black

 

[dvictr]

Ron Pauls racism and anti-semitism would do him in long before the primaries are done.

Certain posters here may see KluKKers hiding behind every tree stump, but in the real world, they just aren't numerous enough to sustain a candidate who is openly sympathetic towards them.

[qimg]http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c345/Kilstryke/images.jpg[/qimg]
Herr Doktor Ron Paul schmoozing with
Stormfront.org founder Don Black and son Derek Black

yeah just like Obama will have Lewis Farrakhan as Secretary of Homeland Security, Bill Aeyers as Secretary of Defense, and Jerimiah Wright Secretary of State..

Black people should be the number one supporter of a candidate that wants to reform drug laws and deal with overcrowded prisons- thats probably a racist statement in itself but true. what has Obama done for Black people??

 

[Kthulhut Fhtagn]

http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionl...n.html?cid=6a00d8341c7de353ef01538e7c84dd970b

actually re reading the article i think it might be a troll/ poe

I didn't see any complaints leveled at Paul that struck me as particularly unreasonable.

yeah just like Obama will have Lewis Farrakhan as Secretary of Homeland Security, Bill Aeyers as Secretary of Defense, and Jerimiah Wright Secretary of State..

Paul's racism is actually fairly well documented. Would you like some quotes from one of his supporters back in 2008? Or would you prefer to google Vox Day for yourself? The incredibly racist and sexist (especially sexist) things the man has said has certainly warranted Paul disavowing the man. Instead he put his endorsement up on the front-page of his campaign website.

Black people should be the number one supporter of a candidate that wants to reform drug laws and deal with overcrowded prisons- thats probably a racist statement in itself but true. what has Obama done for Black people??

 

[dvictr]

^^ i reword the statement as "the black and minority communities"

 

[Joey McGee]

Paul goes on "The Alex Jones Show" and therefore should be considered immoral, unprincipled and a scumbag for blatantly courting the most disturbed and vulnerable constituents (it has worked) All of the quacks support him like the health ranger and mercola. That's why I hate Ron Paul, his infantile folk philosophy (say, we should have "health freedom" which is freedom for quacks to profit) trumps reality all the time.

Heh, his thoughts on evolution are laughable too. He thinks that that shouldn't be a question that you decide the president on? Excuse me? The unwillingness to investigate and take sides on a scientific matter that has been settled for well over 100 years isn't a good measure of leadership? What a loon

 

[dvictr]

Ron Paul needs an opponent to step up to the plate.. Huckabee is out

 

[Bilbo]

Geez. It didn't take long for the Paultards to show their hands. I guess the real question is, after he loses the republican nomination, will he run as an independent again?

 

[tyr_13]

the NWO is in overdrive

google/bing/altavista/netscape/askjeeves ;p Ron Paul for News results and every big government/ neocon shill writer is taking a shot.

how is such a marginal fringe candidate drawing this much attention. if he is no threat to gather more than a few percentage points of the vote.. why is the need to publish countless articles?

like him or hate him, consider his positions radical or not.. you cannot deny his popularity/support is growing

You say that these increase in articles critical of Ron Paul is consistent with big government /neocon shills writing to discredit a good candidate. I say that it's also perfectly consistent with a candidate with wacked out, terrible ideas gaining in popularity simply because people agree with some of his stances, but are unaware of the other stuff being made aware from people who understand his ideas.

The way to show which is true would be to look at the merits of his ideas. In short; I'm right.

 

[shemp]

the NWO is in overdrive

google/bing/altavista/netscape/askjeeves ;p Ron Paul for News results and every big government/ neocon shill writer is taking a shot.

how is such a marginal fringe candidate drawing this much attention. if he is no threat to gather more than a few percentage points of the vote.. why is the need to publish countless articles?

like him or hate him, consider his positions radical or not.. you cannot deny his popularity/support is growing

This increase in his support directly correlates with an increase in the number of people who have completely lost touch with reality.

 

[geni]

the NWO is in overdrive

google/bing/altavista/netscape/askjeeves ;p Ron Paul for News results and every big government/ neocon shill writer is taking a shot.

how is such a marginal fringe candidate drawing this much attention. if he is no threat to gather more than a few percentage points of the vote.. why is the need to publish countless articles?

like him or hate him, consider his positions radical or not.. you cannot deny his popularity/support is growing

Cheap way to fill column inches. You can reuse all the material from list time around and you finaly get to use the stuff you didn't manage to dig out until after the last lot of primaries were over.

At the same time there is a lack of other political news. The Republican primary season is only just limping along, the tea party is yesterdays news and most of the more interesting congressbeings have dropped of the radar. Obama meanwhile is being about as politicaly interesting as a report on paperclip use in the pentagon. So having a go at the stranger candidates is about the only option the papers have left.

 

[dvictr]

i am very familiar with RP and his stances on all the issues and i honestly dont understand why such hatred towards his views.

RP is the very definition of a libertarian excluding his views on abortion and his support for the military. he is has been associated with the republican party for ever and would not have a platform to shares his views. he served in the Vietnam. if you want to argue socialism vs libertarianism, fine but its unfair to attack the mans character. certain aspects of pure liberalism may sound racist but only to people who dont understand the concepts.

ending the fed/ "phasing out" various departments is a theoretical vision that would not occur radically on day one of an RP administration. the gold standard or bimetallism is a real economic concept supported by economists and experts in finance around the world that has its merits. RP is not an economist, he merely echoes research from real economist like von mises, and FA Hayek -a nobel prize winner. i dont see anything radical at all with RP arguments at all.

btw. RP has never run as an independent and is looking to secure the GOP nomination by shifting the electorate views in his favor.