• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Clear evidence that 9/11 was an inside job

FatFreddy88 said:
There are plausible scenarios that would explain the light poles and the witnesses.
Click to expand...

But that massive truckload of FAIL Ranke is incapable of doing so. The bloody drongo has no inklling of how stuff breaks. Hoiw then, can he come up with a rational theory from looking at any of the structures involved?
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=9632
Click to expand...

The moron actually thinks there is something odd about the way the lightpoles broke when they fell. One look at the bottom pictures in post #1 will tell you that that worthless little slacker never tried to bend a pipe.

Dude, try to get somebody really qualified to look at the evidence that these bottom feeders try to sell you before you make an ass of yourself by trying to sell that stuff to us.
 
FatFreddy88 said:
I think everybody has seen this picture of the craft that hit the Pentagon behind the box.
http://0911.voila.net/index3.htm

This proof shows that the craft is too small to be a 757.
http://www.bcrevolution.ca/911_part_iii.htm
Click to expand...
This was answered years ago...

FatFreddy88 said:
There is a section of the side of the Pentagon that has a protruding wall as can be seen in the top picture in this link.
http://0911.voila.net/index1.htm
Click to expand...

The "17 foot wide hole" is answered and placed in context visually here. Answered years ago.

FatFreddy88 said:
It looks like the nose of a fighter such as an F-4.
Click to expand...
A 9/11 truther site of all places, deals with lots of your Pentagon woes, including this. They've had that up for years too.

Use the search function; as has been pointed out these claims have been dealt with long before you even considered making this thread,

If you still believe in this immaterial, then find another venue. You're unlikely to find anyone whose real patient with this pentagon no planes fiction either because there's so much that's already been said, and/or nothing new to add. That said, there is absolutely no requirement to go over this anymore.
 
FatFreddy88 said:
I have to stop now as this cybercafe is about to close. It's after midnight here in Madrid.
Click to expand...

A cybercafe?!?! :jaw-dropp


Don't you know the government monitors those channels?!


You at least wrap aluminum foil around your laptop, right? It's not perfect, but it scrambles the communications just enough for them to only catch, like, every third word of your posts.

Stay off the truthers sites, man! The men in black pants and white shirts are the government sponsered employees...they will confiscate your computer and lock you in the back room and try to convince you 9/11 was simply "an accident". That's if they don't give you a grande half-caf latte laced with cyanide first.

Watch your back! :eye-poppi
 
R.Mackey said:
I had no idea Madrid was so close to Manchester. :boggled:
Click to expand...

Those cheap Ryan Air flights are the bane of many a continental European...Right now it's only £22.99 Manchester - Madrid. That leaves you plenty of cash for the cybercafe. :)
 
I'm having a busy work week so I won't be able to do any serious posting for a few days but here's some more stuff.
http://www.physics911.net/omholt
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2006/06/why-they-didnt-use-757-to-hit-pentagon.html
http://www.physics911.net/georgenelson
(excerpt)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft — and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. This is because every military and civilian passenger-carrying aircraft have many parts that are identified for safety of flight. That is, if any of the parts were to fail at any time during a flight, the failure would likely result in the catastrophic loss of aircraft and passengers. Consequently, these parts are individually controlled by a distinctive serial number and tracked by a records section of the maintenance operation and by another section called plans and scheduling.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


So you debunked your own claim with your own link. Nice job.
Click to expand...
That link came from here.
http://www.bautforum.com/showthread.php/48507-911-pentagon?p=891577#post891577
(post #1096)

The person who did that proof was trying to obfuscate the issue. He didn't even believe his own argument. The fact that he says it doesn't make it true.
 
FatFreddy88 said:
In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft — and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. This is because every military and civilian passenger-carrying aircraft have many parts that are identified for safety of flight. That is, if any of the parts were to fail at any time during a flight, the failure would likely result in the catastrophic loss of aircraft and passengers. Consequently, these parts are individually controlled by a distinctive serial number and tracked by a records section of the maintenance operation and by another section called plans and scheduling.
Click to expand...

We know that quote. Since all four aircraft were identified by make, model and specific registration number, and the precise cause of all four crashes is known, doesn't it strike you that it's totally and utterly irrelevant to anything related in any way whatsoever to 9/11?

Dave
 
FatFreddy88 said:
In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft — and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. This is because every military and civilian passenger-carrying aircraft have many parts that are identified for safety of flight. That is, if any of the parts were to fail at any time during a flight, the failure would likely result in the catastrophic loss of aircraft and passengers. Consequently, these parts are individually controlled by a distinctive serial number and tracked by a records section of the maintenance operation and by another section called plans and scheduling.
Click to expand...

Why would investigators need to find out what aircraft they were and why they crashed? Do you think they didn't know?
 
We are falling back into arguing over George Nelson's crap about needing the serial numbers. He is not an expert on forensic investigations of crimes. He is a former aircraft maintenance officer. All he knows is the mechanics of flight and how to look for defective parts. President of an investigation board is a rotating duty like Staff Duty Officer. Everybody in flight operations does it if he hangs around long enough. He only looks at one aspect from any trained position of expertise.

Since we know that the crashes did not involve parts failures, he had no useful information to add to the investigation, nor were the data he would need to do his normal job needed to identify which of only four possible aircraft were at each site.

Further, his affiliation with and support for certain political movements calls his loyalty to the Constitution into question. He thinks the government did the Murrah bombing, too.

Total sludgeball.
 
FatFreddy88 said:
I'm having a busy work week so I won't be able to do any serious posting for a few days ...
Click to expand...

I'm unsure exactly which emotion I should feel on hearing this news.

Does this mean your postings today were merely meant as a joke into fooling us into believing you are actually the kind of person who upon seeing a sign on a window reading "Do Not Lick This Window" would lick the window, and that you will start speaking words of non-gibberish upon your return?

Or do you intend to put more vigour into your campaign of ass-hattery when next we meet?
 
FatFreddy88 said:
I'm having a busy work week so I won't be able to do any serious posting for a few days but here's some more stuff.
http://www.physics911.net/omholt
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2006/06/why-they-didnt-use-757-to-hit-pentagon.html
http://www.physics911.net/georgenelson
(excerpt)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft — and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. This is because every military and civilian passenger-carrying aircraft have many parts that are identified for safety of flight. That is, if any of the parts were to fail at any time during a flight, the failure would likely result in the catastrophic loss of aircraft and passengers. Consequently, these parts are individually controlled by a distinctive serial number and tracked by a records section of the maintenance operation and by another section called plans and scheduling.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Click to expand...

Holy crap!:eek: The 4 aircraft used on 9/11 were involved in accidents.:jaw-dropp
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom