TAM 2011 WTC 7 debate

[oody]

A better suggestion would be to remove all the videos before anyone else can see them... and what makes you think the sneering arrogance on display in the video is not part of his "real" persona? His history on JREF doesn't suggest otherwise.

Thank you, Walter. I have a better understanding now why we'll never see the type of formal presentation I was alluding to. If people are taking those youtubes as auditions for public speaking gigs, he has no one to blame but himself.

 

[DGM]

Not sure whether you mean me here.

No. His post (he edited) was in breach.

 

[Sunstealer]

I have completely debunked the crackpot pseudo-science NIST theory on WTC 7 and outlined a scientific CD theory in its stead. In the sane world of science and reason that should make me a distinguished person. In the bizzarro JREF world of pseudo-science and pseudo-skepticism it does not seem to.

Great. Where can I read it? Are you published?

 

[cmatrix]

Great. Where can I read it? Are you published?

You can hear it as soon as JREF sets up the debate.

 

[twinstead]

I have completely debunked the crackpot pseudo-science NIST theory on WTC 7 and outlined a scientific CD theory in its stead. In the sane world of science and reason that should make me a distinguished person. In the bizzarro JREF world of pseudo-science and pseudo-skepticism it does not seem to.

Did you know that things aren't true just because you SAY them? I know. I was shocked to discover that as well. You're welcome.

 

[GlennB]

You can hear it as soon as JREF sets up the debate.

Well, yeah, but then only a bunch of idiots having fun at a JREF meeting will get to hear your wisdom.

Meanwhile you could achieve international fame by publishing in a major science journal. If they prove picky, try the newspapers.

 

[tsig]

You can hear it as soon as JREF sets up the debate.

Put it here.

 

[Sword_Of_Truth]

You can hear it as soon as JREF sets up the debate.

There isn't going to be a debate. You said that you aren't going to show up.

 

[cmatrix]

Put it here.

Set up a moderated thread just between me Mackey, TFK and Dave Thomas and I will (and/or with any of those on the OP and/or anyone with a verified MSc or PHd in science).

 

[DGM]

Set up a moderated thread just between me Mackey, TFK and Dave Thomas and I will (and/or with any of those on the OP and/or anyone with a verified MSc or PHd in science).

What are your degrees? I will petition this for you if you show your qualifications.

Anyone else want to know this and petition this thread on his behalf?

Show of hands.

 

[Sword_Of_Truth]

Set up a moderated thread just between me Mackey, TFK and Dave Thomas and I will (and/or with any of those on the OP and/or anyone with a verified MSc or PHd in science).

How about "no"?

You claim to have information on the murders of 2500+ (including 24 of your fellow canadians) people but you refuse to reveal it unless the administrators of an obscure web forum dance for you?

Do you not care about the victims and there families? Who the hell are you to turn their tragedy into a playground for your ego?

 

[Macgyver1968]

What are your degrees? I will petition this for you if you show your qualifications.

Anyone else want to know this and petition this thread on his behalf?

Show of hands.

According to the link Walter posted:

Graduated in 1995 with a BSC in Psychology and Computer Science from the University of Calgary.

Yeah...I'd like to see that thread.

 

[George 152]

There isn't going to be a debate. You said that you aren't going to show up.

The sound of a collective sigh of relief was heard throughout the known Universe but it was only a promise

 

[tsig]

Set up a moderated thread just between me Mackey, TFK and Dave Thomas and I will (and/or with any of those on the OP and/or anyone with a verified MSc or PHd in science).

Here you go.


http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=206453

 

[femr2]

cmatrix,

How does your two sentence theory of WTC7 handle movement of the structure 100s in advance of descent ?

 

[Cl1mh4224rd]

You can hear it as soon as JREF sets up the debate.

But you claim that you've already done it. You must have accomplished that outside of any "debate", so why do you suddenly require a debate to present your information?

 

[DGM]

cmatrix,

How does your two sentence theory of WTC7 handle movement of the structure 100s in advance of descent ?

[cmatrix mode]


never happened.........................disinfo.

[/cmatrix mode]


You think we're bad? I'd love to see you get into a debate with him.

 

[cmatrix]

cmatrix,

How does your two sentence theory of WTC7 handle movement of the structure 100s in advance of descent ?

I don't have a two sentence theory of WTC7 and any such movement is completely irrelevant to the theory.

 

[cmatrix]

But you claim that you've already done it. You must have accomplished that outside of any "debate", so why do you suddenly require a debate to present your information?

Look at all the moronic posts I can no longer see and you'll have your answer.

 

[Macgyver1968]

I don't have a two sentence theory of WTC7 and any such movement is completely irrelevant to the theory.

I guess Femr2 and I were both confused when you said this:

I can prove that in one but preferably two sentences.