TAM 2011 WTC 7 debate

Why should I? Based on the unimaginably moronic posts here that I no longer see, most here would not have the capacity to understand it despite it dealing with elementary middle-school level scientific principles. As a bona-fide genius, Randi certainly understands it. It may take him a while to come to terms with it but he understands it.

Anyway, the evidence has been referred to by me and others here already. The real question is why can't you get it?

You're in a world of your own.
 
In April 2007 I was astonished to find out that the WTC towers on 9/11 fell at nearly free-fall speed. After reviewing many many videos of the two towers falling symmetrically into the vertical path of greatest resistance I realized that the george bush official theory about 9/11 is very wrong

More word salad with words you don't understand.

I run a 20 second 100 yard dash... does that mean i am at "nearly a world record" speed?

You need to look up symmetrically, and path of greatest resistance
 
It would be the mental equivalent of Muhammad Ali in his prime against one of the kids from Goonies.

Why he would even acknowledge your existence is beyond me.

TAM's hosting of NIST apologist Michael Shermer is akin to hosting a supporter of creationism or flat Earth theory.
 

Back
Top Bottom