its called speculation. prof jones found chips with multiple layers. was this stuff sprayed on or was it pre fabricated meaning it could came in multiple layers and rolled out onto the steel. if it came say 10 layers thick, one could easily put a layer of sulfur down then more layers of the red grey chip material then sulfur and so on...
So you are going to take a brittle 20µm layer with another 15-20µm layer and roll it up!
Do you actually have any understanding of how thin that is? Copy paper is about 0.1mm thick. That's 100µm. 2 1/2 times thicker than observed in the Harrit paper. (5x if just the red layer is thermite!) What were the NWO operatives doing? Putting the stuff up like wall paper!
If it came 10 layers thick then we would have seen that in the Harrit et al paper. What no multiple layers. You do know that calculations have been done and show that a temperature rise of no more than 5° (I think it was less iirc) would occur with this thickness.
If it was sprayed on it wouldn't be sprayed on in micron thick layers now would it. Think about how long that would take to build up any sort of thickness that could actually heat the steel up. Secondly if it was hosed on then what is the gray layer for? Why not just hose on the red layer?
Ridiculous fanciful Speculation? yep. Science? no. Well done you've achieved nothing
so it's just
Great, now what? You are speculating without any sound scientific reasoning. That's called "making **** up".
The thermite reaction is Fe
2O
3 + 2
Al --> 2Fe +
Al2O
3
Seeing as you are a master of speculation, could you please speculate as to why we don't see any alumina in the oxidised layer? Where did the Al
2O
3 go?
Shall I speculate? Martians beamed it all up aboard their spaceship. Your turn.
but he did state that this experiment exhibited the same corrosion characteristics that barnett found regarding the wtc 7 steel:
"I (with colleagues) have done the experiment with thermite + sulfur (often called "thermate") acting on a piece of WTC steel. In fact, I did the experiment with BBC filming it! Then we looked at the steel, including use of electron microscopy, and found the same characteristic corrosion as found by Barnett et al. in WTC 7 steel. OTOH, I know of no expt done to test whether gypsum and heat would have this effect -- I would be VERY surprised, as the sulfur in gypsum is not elemental Sulfur, but is bound as a sulfate (very difficult to reduce to suflur.) We should do the latter experiment to rule out such nonsense. If you can provide direct quotes from the BBC program on this point, it may prove useful in a research note on the subject."
For the
3rd time - Source please.
FYI - we know sulphur is the main driving force for this type of corrosion. Therefore we could do "the experiment" (no details of what he did are forth coming) with sulphur and Yorkshire pudding or sulphur and hamsters and still find similar corrosion.
Do you know why an FeS
powder was used in the R. R. Biederman, Erin Sullivan, George F. Vander Voort, and R. D. Sisson, Jr. paper?
I'll tell you. It was quick, cheap and easy. Now it's obvious that SO2/H2S was not the only gas present - CO, CO2 would have been too. In order to look at a range of possibilities they would have had to have used specialist furnaces whereby partial pressures of gases could be controlled for long periods of time. They showed that the production of FeS at high temperature could cause a similar effect to that seen without having to perform an experiment with different conditions over long periods of time - smart people.
