Gage's next debate

Posting the same thing over and over and expecting a different response. Can i get a WOW!

heres a new one. 25.4mm of steel in just 8-18 days! professor sisson could only get "little metal" to dissolve in 24 hrs.
 
So? Things can't happen for a first time, or happen only once? That's an argument from incredulity, a logical fallacy. As I noted. I note that you still haven't removed your signature either, so I'm suspecting that you aren't here for honest debate.

from what i remember, derailing democracy is the book. have ya heard of operation mockingbird before?
 
I'd like to see the data on that please. Do you have a link to that data?

Could you also point out where the Sulphur is in these red layers in the Harrit et al paper?

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=181&pictureid=874[/qimg]

:D

what?

why would you think one has to have the sulfur in the red grey chips?
 
:D

what?

why would you think one has to have the sulfur in the red grey chips?
Cat got your tongue? You have pushed thermite as the reason for the corrosion we see. You have even quoted Jones as doing an experiment filmed by the BBC using thermite with sulphur and the exact same corrosion observed. You obviously believe that you need sulphur to get the eutectic composition.

But when I ask you to show me where the Sulphur is in the thermite Jones supposedly found you go all coy and shy like a 3 year old.

So can I assume that you now believe that Jones' samples couldn't have caused the corrosion observed because there was no Sulphur in the red layer?

Nope, I expect you'll just put up a couple of words with a smilie. If you do you should use this one :blush: you've just been pwnd.
 
:D

what?

why would you think one has to have the sulfur in the red grey chips?

Because he claimed he replicated the swiss cheese using thermAte, which includes sulfur.

What Jones et al. claim (falsely) that they found, was thermIte, not thermAte.

Do you see the contradiction now?
 
But when I ask you to show me where the Sulphur is in the thermite Jones supposedly found you go all coy and shy like a 3 year old.
? if it was pre fab stuff, put some sulfur between layers. if i remember right, prof jones thinks the red grey chips might have been used as "matches" to ignite thermXte.

the point is that it showed the same "characteristic corrosion as found by Barnett et al. in WTC 7 steel."

So can I assume that you now believe that Jones' samples couldn't have caused the corrosion observed because there was no Sulphur in the red layer?
we can always speculate. see above.

Nope, I expect you'll just put up a couple of words with a smilie. If you do you should use this one :blush: you've just been pwnd.

yeahhhhh..right. no sunstealer, you can blow alot of smoke but you cant explain how prof sisson was suppose to replicate an office/debris fire with powders that supposedly caused the eutectic to form in the first place and then to "corrode" the steel. 15.9mm of a36 steel in just 8 days is massive.
 
15.9mm of a36 steel in just 8 days is massive.
This remains an argument from incredulity. "Massive" compared to what, exactly?

And no, the quote you have in your signature was not uttered by former CIA director Colby, no matter where you misremember it from.
 
This remains an argument from incredulity. "Massive" compared to what, exactly?
compared to the fire wise professors "who expected to see distortion and bending--but not holes."

And no, the quote you have in your signature was not uttered by former CIA director Colby, no matter where you misremember it from.

and you know this how?
 
Because he claimed he replicated the swiss cheese using thermAte, which includes sulfur.

What Jones et al. claim (falsely) that they found, was thermIte, not thermAte.

Do you see the contradiction now?

Ahem**

Sene? Care to respond? Or are you going to ignore this post?
 
compared to the fire wise professors "who expected to see distortion and bending--but not holes."

Aren't these the same "fire wise professors" that you and the 9/11 truth movement attack as shills and (weakly) attempt to discredit their work?
 
Curtain-fall collapses

Does anyone know about curtain-fall collapses in fires? This I got from Vincent Dunn's book on Fire Safety. Looks like this may describe the Building 7 perimeter collapse, except that it's masonry/brick materials so my question --- would this kind of collapse scenario apply in a steel-framed building with perimeter columns?

Curtain-Fall Collapse

In this type of collapse, the exterior masonry wall drops like a falling curtain cut loose at the top. The wall crumbles and falls straight down, with brick and mortar forming a pile on the ground near the base of the wall. The collapse of the brick veneer, brick cavity, or masonry-backed stonewall often occurs in a curtain-fall manner. If the metal ties holding a brick veneer wall to plywood backing are destroyed by fire, or if mortar bonding between an exterior finished stonewall and a masonry backing wall is washed away by hose streams, large sections of brick or stone veneer may fall off the building's exterior. Firefighters entering, leaving, or operating near the doorways beneath the curtain-fall collapse may be killed or seriously injured by falling brick.

Another situation of potential curtain-fall collapse occurs when fire has collapsed the interior of a multi-story brick-and-joist structure and the remaining free-standing walls have many window openings with brick arches serving as linters. If one of the masonry walls starts to fall and the brick arches spanning the tops of the wall openings crumble and fall apart, the wall will fall downward rather than straight out.

Maybe an entirely different mechanism is at play here, but it's interesting to see that very fast "curtain-fall" collapses do happen in fires, not just in CD. Does curtain-fall sound like free-fall, or am I reading too much into this?
 
Does anyone know about curtain-fall collapses in fires? This I got from Vincent Dunn's book on Fire Safety. Looks like this may describe the Building 7 perimeter collapse, except that it's masonry/brick materials so my question --- would this kind of collapse scenario apply in a steel-framed building with perimeter columns?

Curtain-Fall Collapse

In this type of collapse, the exterior masonry wall drops like a falling curtain cut loose at the top. The wall crumbles and falls straight down, with brick and mortar forming a pile on the ground near the base of the wall. The collapse of the brick veneer, brick cavity, or masonry-backed stonewall often occurs in a curtain-fall manner. If the metal ties holding a brick veneer wall to plywood backing are destroyed by fire, or if mortar bonding between an exterior finished stonewall and a masonry backing wall is washed away by hose streams, large sections of brick or stone veneer may fall off the building's exterior. Firefighters entering, leaving, or operating near the doorways beneath the curtain-fall collapse may be killed or seriously injured by falling brick.

Another situation of potential curtain-fall collapse occurs when fire has collapsed the interior of a multi-story brick-and-joist structure and the remaining free-standing walls have many window openings with brick arches serving as linters. If one of the masonry walls starts to fall and the brick arches spanning the tops of the wall openings crumble and fall apart, the wall will fall downward rather than straight out.

Maybe an entirely different mechanism is at play here, but it's interesting to see that very fast "curtain-fall" collapses do happen in fires, not just in CD. Does curtain-fall sound like free-fall, or am I reading too much into this?

That's exactly what happened to Tower 1 & 2. If any Truthers suggest otherwise, shut up & go back to school & actually learn something.
 
Senenmut said:
This remains an argument from incredulity. "Massive" compared to what, exactly?
compared to the fire wise professors "who expected to see distortion and bending--but not holes."
You are comparing steel to professors? This makes no sense.

And no, the quote you have in your signature was not uttered by former CIA director Colby, no matter where you misremember it from.

and you know this how?
You refused to provide a source when challenged at length in this thread.

Here was another poster's (unsuccessful) defense of the quote.

carlitos said:
achimspok said:
I'm sure "right on the money" is as accurate as the fake quote from William Colby in Senenmut's signature.

"The CIA & The Media" from Rolling Stone, 10/20/77

I have scanned 3 online versions of that article. Here is one that is linked by the wikipedia entry. http://danwismar.com/uploads/Bernstein - CIA and Media.htm

None of them contain the phrase "the CIA owns."
None of them contain the phrase "major media."

I think it's a fake that you copy/pasted from some conspiracy website. Would you care to prove me wrong?
 
Last edited:
You are comparing steel to professors? This makes no sense.
it is comparing what they expected to see ( distortion and bending--but not holes) to 15.9mm of a36 steel gone in 8 days.


You refused to provide a source when challenged at length in this thread.

I think it's a fake that you copy/pasted from some conspiracy website. Would you care to prove me wrong?
you can read about it here. that is the book it is traced back too. i just bought the book on amazon so if its not there, ill let ya know.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=153698
 

Back
Top Bottom