• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Gage's next debate

It looks like the rest of the building is not weakened much at all, which the CD companies say is safer in earthquake-prone areas.

If you read the patent it has a number of points truthers plug their ears to. 1. The structure needs no pre-weakening & 2. It is usable for all building designs.
 
At least with the Wagner operas I get to sit and watch others slug it out instead of being in the middle of it myself!

I'd much sooner sing a part of a Wagner opera than endure watching 4 of them in a row :D

I had set a deadline with my college helper of June 27, but he does have over 200 videos and photo clips to insert into 20 separate YouTube videos so we'll see how he does. Sometime this weekend I will try to set up a new thread for feedback on these videos.

Great! Looking forward to it!
 
It'll be a few days yet... just saw the first draft of the first hour of rebuttals (the total will be over three hours) and I'm real happy with what my video editor guy is doing. Unlike the original debate, I take my time explaining every point. It won't be for the casual YouTube surfer but it'll explain our points VERY clearly. Surely by July 4 I'll have something out there, and the whole thing not long after that. Hang in there gang, Chris
 
Richard Gage video rebuttals: first three are up

Here's a link to my first YouTube video rebuttal of Gage's Blueprint for Truth. Three of them are up so far and 17 more on their way! This one is a unifying statement directed to people on both sides of the issue. The real content begins in Part One, an explanation of a likely collapse scenario for the WTC 9/11 Twin Towers. Part Two is an independent investigation of Richard Gage's Ten reasons for controlled demolition.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jC3JgWkNNIQ

Happy viewing,
Chris Mohr
 

Back
Top Bottom