BeAChooser
Banned
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2007
- Messages
- 11,716
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100...61610325024.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_AboveLEFTTop
Now there's food for thought.
Obama's Libyan Abdication
The battle for Libya has reached a bloody impasse. Moammar Gadhafi continues to hold Tripoli, but his sons and mercenaries have been unable to break the uprising or retake the country's east. Having loudly declared that Gadhafi "needs to step down from power and leave," President Obama now seems to have retreated into a bizarre but all too typical passivity.
… snip …
We suspect the real reason for Mr. Obama's passivity is more ideological than practical. He and his White House team believe that any U.S. action will somehow be tainted if it isn't wrapped in U.N. or pan-Arab approval. They have internalized their own critique of the Bush Administration to such a degree that they are paralyzed to act even against a dictator as reviled and blood-stained as Gadhafi, and even though it would not require the deployment of U.S. troops.
Mr. Obama won't lead the world because he truly seems to believe that U.S. leadership is morally suspect. But if Mr. Obama thinks George W. Bush was unpopular in the Arab world, he should contemplate the standing of America — and the world reputation of Barack Obama — if Gadhafi and his sons slaughter their way back to power.
Now there's food for thought.