dlorde
Philosopher
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2007
- Messages
- 6,864
Is this the right thread for a mockery?
Did you want a 15 minute mockery or the full half hour?
Is this the right thread for a mockery?
...
Can you point to (link to) the parts in the original bluebook witness statements where these pilots reported this so I can refresh my memory thanks?.
...
No need, I'll concede that's the video...
Because those you linked to do not mention these things.King of the Americas said:Some pilots reported being toyed with, flown 'around', then left in the dust, persay.
By 1952, the CAA had begun its first routine use of radar for approach and departure control.
In that case, it appears we have a teachable moment here.
Your recollection of the events shown in that video differ significantly from what the video actually shows. Why is that?
And what does this tell us about the reliability of eyewitness testimony in general, and yours in particular?
What would have been more accurate would be to say that during a massive parade a balloon floated around a bit, nowhere near any helicopters and because the helicopters were much higher than the balloon, they didn't even see it and therefore made no attempt to chase it.Well, let's see. I remembered that a balloon looking U.F.O. intersected the flight pattern of helicopters, then I remembered one of them breaking out of the pattern to pursue.
Here's what you said about it:Well, let's see. I remembered that a balloon looking U.F.O. intersected the flight pattern of helicopters, then I remembered one of them breaking out of the pattern to pursue.
What was my accuracy level?
Did the video I remembered cease to exist, or did I merely misremember a detail or two about the video.
You "remembered" one unit breaking off to pursue and you "remembered" the object increasing its speed and you "remembered" it escaping....A silver balloon looking object flies between a formation of helicopters. One unit breaks off to pursue but the object increases it rate of speed and escapes...
Your memory, while not perfect, is also not at all reliable. You didn't remember what you had posted yesterday!My memory, while not perfect, is quite reliable.
Well, let's see. I remembered that a balloon looking U.F.O. intersected the flight pattern of helicopters, then I remembered one of them breaking out of the pattern to pursue.
What was my accuracy level?
Did the video I remembered cease to exist, or did I merely misremember a detail or two about the video.
Recently I had to have something engraved, and went to a local jeweler. Once, I entered the store, I immediately flashed on a memory I have, of seeing a diamond collection, in their upstairs area. I must have been 5 or 6 at the time. My mother took her wedding ring in to be appraised, and took my sister and I along.
Once we got to the store, my sister and I began to give the place our once over, going behind counters and past a set of velvet ropes that led past a security guard and upstairs. In the middle of this room was a large table, surrounded by more velvet ropes, on which was an open display case. Therein was a collection of diamonds, the center of which was the blue Hope Diamond.
Years later I saw a diamond documentary, that featured the diamond I saw, along with some others, in a display case exactly like the one I saw. At which I remarked, "Hey, I've SEEN that collection, my sister even touched the one in the middle." I was laughed at, and told this wasn't possible, that this collection would NEVER have been displayed so that 2 kids could get to them and even handle them. I chalked the memory up to a dream I mistook for reality.
Upon entering the store, I asked to speak with someone who had worked there for the longest time hoping to confirm or debunk my memory. I relayed my memory, and the mature woman, smiled and said you didn't make up the story. We still have the collection your remember...
The collection wasn't real. While it contained all the Vanderbilt Collection, displayed as they should be, they were just glass.
The point?
My memory, while flawed, wasn't fiction or a dream at all. I DID in fact see a diamond collection meant to represent the Hope Diamond and others.
My memory, while not perfect, is quite reliable.
Uh, I don't think so....Therein was a collection of diamonds, the center of which was the blue Hope Diamond.
...
The collection wasn't real. While it contained all the Vanderbilt Collection, displayed as they should be, they were just glass.
The point?
My memory, while flawed, wasn't fiction or a dream at all. I DID in fact see a diamond collection meant to represent the Hope Diamond and others.
My memory, while not perfect, is quite reliable.
My memory, while not perfect, is quite reliable.
Uh, I don't think so.
The Hope Diamond was never part of the Vanderbilt collection, therefore what you have just demonstrated is what you do quite a bit on this forum.
You are conflating misremembered personal memories and misremembered "facts" of some documentary you saw.
"One version of the Hope Diamond story states that when the sultan was deposed in 1909 he sold the diamond directly to Pierre Cartier. The other version, (which I believe and is on record as the true historical lineage), is that the Hope Diamond was sold on the London auction block in 1901 to a New York diamond dealer known as “Joseph Frankel’s Son.” The amount that it sold for was not recorded. However, it is recorded that at the same time the Hope Diamond was offered to W.K. Vanderbilt for the price of $500,000.00, but he did not purchase the diamond."
Show me a picture of how the Hope Diamond is and has been displayed, along side other great stones?
That said I concede that it was not part of the "Vanderbilt Collection".
Confabulation. I suggest you look it up.
Really? You mean you didn't lash out angrily at the people who mocked you and refused to accept your testimony at face value? You didn't berate them for being closed-minded skeptics when they refused to believe that you had seen something extraordinary?
Hmmm... curious.
So, your memory of an event you had witnessed was such that you believed you had seen something extraordinary, but it turned out to be something which was actually something less than extraordinary, something actually quite mundane?
Hmm... curiouser and curiouser.
In both cases, my detractors were wrong.
I saw 'something', that was made to look exactly as my memory captured it. I saw the Hope Diamond, and some surrounding stones.
That my 5-6 year old eyes and memory 'captured' that accurately, was and is astonishing to me.
I HAD written it off, simply because it should have been impossible, that I saw what I did. That diamond has been in the Smithsonian, and well beyond arms reach for some time.
***snip***
If only you could allow yourself to accept the fact that it is far more possible that your sister touched the Hope Diamond as a child, than what you saw on that other occasion was aircraft piloted by ETs.
In both cases, my detractors were wrong.
I saw 'something', that was made to look exactly as my memory captured it. I saw the Hope Diamond, and some surrounding stones.
No.Show me a picture of how the Hope Diamond is and has been displayed, along side other great stones?
Yet you still argue that your memory is infallible and this is sufficient evidence for any of your assertions on this forum.You are conflating misremembered personal memories and misremembered "facts" of some documentary you saw.
10 years of trolling based on one story about lights in the sky. That takes focus. He's trying to broaden his horizons here with these other stories, and it's leading to trouble. He should stay focused on his main thing.