George 152
Philosopher
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2002
- Messages
- 5,012
I haven't claimed it was molten iron. I suggest it was mostly molten steel plus thermite.
Were there molten steel (which btw is impossible) there would be no thermite/thermate/nanothermite...
I haven't claimed it was molten iron. I suggest it was mostly molten steel plus thermite.
Were there molten steel (which btw is impossible) there would be no thermite/thermate/nanothermite...
It would be cool if everyone put him on ignore since his thermite claim is insane. The thread would look a lot more sane if everyone posted comments to the claim, and put anders on ignore.You guys do know that Anders is just screwing with you?
15 per page? 15 posts of nothing, Anders is pulling their legs with nothing, zero substance 100 percent woo.This message is hidden because Anders Lindman is on your ignore list.
..and he is probably the most transparent of the current batch of "chain jerkers".He wants to claim anything that keeps you all jumping through his hoops.
"Once a building strays from the vertical gravity forces are acting against the structure increasing the stresses at the base of the building. We are unlikely to see a skyscraper fall like a tree in the forest. But once it does start to incline, gravitational force will cause the top of the building to collapse downwards on top of itself."
Quality! Oh Anders you are such a wag! First it's thermite! Then it's steel! Then it's thermite mixed with steel! Eleventy one one 111!!I haven't claimed it was molten iron. I suggest it was mostly molten steel plus thermite.
Quality! Oh Anders you are such a wag! First it's thermite! Then it's steel! Then it's thermite mixed with steel! Eleventy one one 111!!
Sorry... I have the residentidiotsdoltsmoronsmental midgetsI mean more "out of touch" truthers (anders here, jammy, billy smith) on ignore.
But I was just struck by an idea (that another truther on youtube constantly parrots), wouldn't it have been easier to just fill a jet with thermite, ignite the thermite and then crash it into the building than to fill a floor with it on the WTC?
I would just like a troofer to explain exactly where the / thermite / thermate / whatever / was placed......i.e. what structural members etc...that would have caused the collapse in the manner in which they happened (and that would have caused the inward bowing of the perimeter columns among other things.)
What do you think Thermite is? What do you think stell is mostly composed of?
A mixture of steel and thermite is far from pure iron.
My guess is that the whole 81st floor was covered with thermite, and when ignited it caused the floor to sag, and core plus exterior columns to become very weak.
Lets see here
Orginal Content: 1/10
Post speed: 9/10
Reasoning: 7/10
Trolling: -6/10
Over all score 11/30 Back off the trolling and come up with some OC and you too can be a stundie finalist
Does he earn points for quoting himself and then replying?
Does he earn points for quoting himself and then replying?
hmmm I guess we could under a bonus point section for anything not covered. But it'll have to be scored once for type of infraction regardless of number of infractions.
Original Content 1/10
Post Speed 9/10
Reasoning 7/10
Trolling -6/10
Stundie Quality Bonus™ 5/*
Overall 16/30
That stundie nomination is just a post away!
I just wanna know what the over/under is! Thanks.
PS. Where do we place our bets? Is it that damn kitty again, because last time, I got a mouse back with my cash, and I wasn't real happy about that.
Even though I've quoted the thermite reaction giving you the reactants and the products you still don't know what thermite is do you? Claiming it was steel plus THERMITE!!! shows you don't know what thermite is. The melting point of Alumina (Al2O3) is 2072°C therefore it cannot be flowing from the tower because you claim that the temp is around 1370°C. Some 700°C lower. So come on Anders move your position again. What's the only thing left on the RHS of the thermite equation? Hint: Begins with "Ir" and ends in "on". And because you have to do that then you have to address my previous post which destroys your argument.I haven't claimed it was molten iron. I suggest it was mostly molten steel plus thermite.
I think you give him 6 points too many for reasoning. A truther index would be a great invention.hmmm I guess we could under a bonus point section for anything not covered. But it'll have to be scored once for type of infraction regardless of number of infractions.
Original Content 1/10
Post Speed 9/10
Reasoning 7/10
Trolling -6/10
Stundie Quality Bonus™ 5/*
Overall 16/30
That stundie nomination is just a post away!