Mehmetin, are you beginning to see how wildly unwieldy the plan you're suggesting is? Did they install these special mechanisms in just four planes? How far in advance? What would have happened if one of the planes had developed some mechanical problem a day earlier and was grounded at some other airport? What if one of these other mechanics had stumbled across the poison gas canisters, tomahawk guidance systems or other special rigging? Or weather problems had caused one of the planes to be, say, flying over the Rockies rather than sitting on the tarmac at Logan when the supposed hijackers were supposed to be boarding their flights? The scheme your conspirators had devised to place specific people at specific airports on very specific planes would have fallen apart if those planes weren't exactly where they should be on the day in question. Just how many rigged jets and fake teams of hijackers would be required to allow for any of the sorts of variables I've mentioned?
John, the reliability of the actions was always in my mind during all the study I made, since 7 years. And I am an engineer who is so tied on the reliability that before taking any decision I consider it in all aspect to avoid any problem later.
I answer you again: The manner I explained it in my power point is the ONLY manner I would do such action. Especially, I will never trust 19 Arabic people to make such action. Sooner or later one of them will make a mistake. You can see, how many terror attacks made by Muslims since 9/11/2001 succeeded? Richard Reid, the Nigerian Faruk Abdulmutallab, other New York bomb taxy, … . Almost none succeeded. They are definitely unable to make such action, and I will never trust them.
Now your questions should be considered, the events should be reliable. The mechanisms should be extremely reliable, no fault could be accepted, so the design should consider that aspect, the system could not start prematurely without the order given by the team; but that’s also the reliability required from a missile; Tomahawk missile should be fully reliable, one can not accept any Tomahawk missile be self fired without orders! So that reliability exists natively. There is no risk to get any plane grounded.
Any way, the delay between install and the attacks should be reduced as much as possible. And that was probably between 2 days and 5 days. The stay locations of the planes were known since long time, and they can be enough sure about that aspect. The perpetrators have access to whole data of the planes.
Let's now look at the "official story". For the 19 Muslim hijackers plan to work, they don't need very specific, pre-rigged jets to accomplish their goal. They just need box-cutters, a certain ruthless determination, basic flying skills and any jet with at least enough fuel to fly to their targets. Unlike the conspirators in your scheme, they don't care if their true identities/motives are discovered after the deed is done, quite the contrary in fact.
For a non Muslim it looks simple to get 19 Muslims ready to suicide themselves while their life is good, they have no problems, … In practice, finding 19 people is impossible. In whole history, you can not find more than two suicide terror strike made by Muslims. In 19 people, you’ll get too many opposition making many of the refuse to participate. It’s easy to tell, but it’s impossible make.
I ask you again, this scheme you think the perpetrators adopted, it's an evil scheme, yes, but is it a smart scheme? A scheme that is likely to work and remain undiscovered for years or even decades? Please don't dodge this question and say that you would never perpetrate such a scheme yourself for moral reasons. That is beside the point. I am asking you to consider not the morals of the plan but the logistics of the plan itself as a thought experiment. Actually write down what you think would be required to pull the scheme off from A to Z and ask yourself if this is an intelligent scheme with a reasonable chance of success. Believers in the "official story" can do this quite easily, but I have yet to see any believer in an alternate 9/11-related theory do so.
As I told here up, that’s the ONLY manner such attacks could be made. As the development is specially made for that purpose, it will remain secret for longtime. Even when I explain it, people refuse to consider such technology. For the reliability, almost all the systems exist and they are fully tested since decades. The systems are fully reliable to be able to use them in weapons. The only development is some actuators easy to test and could be 100% reliable.
Even with that there was still some danger to get a fault in many things. They had to reduce the risks at maximum possibility, and they had to check everything. That’s why they can not use several teams to control the planes; they can only use two people working together for the same action, controlling each other, planning the events together, …
Even with that, they had to check if the systems worked right, if the pilots were dead, if it was the right plane who was activated, … Sure, their work has to be done in an extremely secure way.
Consider yourself, how will you make to manage such risky action.
Do ou have any argument against it?
