The Freeman Movement and England

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Spirit can be partially revealed @ Freemen.Freeforums.org

If you want to uncover the "Systems" of Law & Money... that's the place to go.

Only you can uncover the FULL "Revelation" by doing your own research.

It's obvious that you people don't have a Law Dictionary, so you might want to get a few of those for starters.

You also might want to start fixing that disconnect in your logic skills.

Repeatedly, you people have fabricated some steps to reach insane conclusions. WHY??

You're not trying to hide anything, are you??
 
The Spirit can be partially revealed @ Freemen.Freeforums.org

If you want to uncover the "Systems" of Law & Money... that's the place to go.

Only you can uncover the FULL "Revelation" by doing your own research.

It's obvious that you people don't have a Law Dictionary, so you might want to get a few of those for starters.

You also might want to start fixing that disconnect in your logic skills.

Repeatedly, you people have fabricated some steps to reach insane conclusions. WHY??

You're not trying to hide anything, are you??

You're very funny. You've clearly been to the Menard school of posting....

As regards Law Dictionaries, let's just say I've seen a few in my time. And very many court cases, more than you could conceive of. I think my understanding of the law is just fine thank you.

If you can explain how I've reached "insane" conclusions on your posts, I'll revisit what I've said. I'll look forward to that.

I'll also look forward to getting that missing explanation about the City of London Corporation. ;)
 
The Spirit can be partially revealed @ Freemen.Freeforums.org

If you want to uncover the "Systems" of Law & Money... that's the place to go.

Only you can uncover the FULL "Revelation" by doing your own research.

It's obvious that you people don't have a Law Dictionary, so you might want to get a few of those for starters.

You also might want to start fixing that disconnect in your logic skills.

Repeatedly, you people have fabricated some steps to reach insane conclusions. WHY??

You're not trying to hide anything, are you??
You caught me. I'm actually a shape-shifting lizard. Curse you, David Icke! Now I must leave and try to cull the sheeple herd in another part of the galaxy.

Or maybe an early edition law dictionary interpreted by ignorant trolls will sort me right out.
 
So we come back to the core "freeman" principles in that case don't we? Prove that being a "freeman" actually works and extracts you from the society that you so despise. Come on.
Prove that Missisippians have the right to carry an unconcealed gun without a permit, even tho it's written down in two different Constitutions... and then you will have your answer.

I commented on your attitude towards your peers -
That's "rallying against my peers"??

Do you people really speak English, or what?

Your attitude speaks volumes.
My attitude, eh??

So that means you side with j-buster on which of his posts?? ... in regards to his attitude over mine?? Point them out for us.

You only side with him to prove my point, that MOST of you are sheeple, just like Americans. In fact, I'd say this group is far more sheepish than any Mississippians I've ever met.

On 'successes' you state -

That classic CT chestnut once again of no evidence = evidence. And you wonder why people like us laugh at this stuff!!
You're NOT going to find an answer in a TITLE, like "Freeman". OK? I have previously said this, and I will say it repeatedly until you stop asking it.

You have to assert your reality in order to "become free".

If your reality is that you are invincible because you have a title, then I'm sorry I've been wasting my time here. You're not grasping the concept that you're not FREE because you're a FREEMAN.

You're FREE because you ASSERT YOUR RIGHTS!!

I then asked you about your grounds for your concludions about the City of London Corporation. You said-


Come on, that doesn't even begin to give me a straight answer does it?
Are you braindead, or what??? Nobody ever taught you how to research? It took me less than 3 seconds to find this link...

the city of london is a corporation

The answer is right under your noses.

Do you know what a municipality is??
 
see the identical attitude?
Were you trying to make a point?

What was it??

You're very funny. You've clearly been to the Menard school of posting....
Whatever the frick that means...

As regards Law Dictionaries, let's just say I've seen a few in my time. And very many court cases, more than you could conceive of. I think my understanding of the law is just fine thank you.
Your understanding is a big FAIL.

If you can explain how I've reached "insane" conclusions on your posts, I'll revisit what I've said. I'll look forward to that.
Well.. you see... I quote you all whenever you make an insane jump to conclusion. Pull that quote back into the present, and I will point it out step by step.

I'll also look forward to getting that missing explanation about the City of London Corporation. ;)
You missed it, alright.

You cant get past the first hurdle (having your withdrawal of consent theory accepted as lawful excuse)
http://freemen.freeforums.org/withdrawal-of-consent-debunked-t127.html
I don't think you've been there recently. You should watch PHOSPHENE's video and you'll get an idea of what your argument is.
 
I

I would wager you have never met any Mississippians
How much??

The admin can likely tell you where I'm posting from. (No city, tho, please ;) I'm not ready to die just yet.)

You can also see that I post the link to Freemen.Freeforums.org at all the forums I frequent.

Here's a guide I wrote about motorized bicycles, to empower people...
http://www.motoredbikes.com/showthread.php?t=10392

(sig is disabled for that initial post, but the rest have the link)

EDIT: Oh, and in case you think sparky @ motoredbikes.com isn't me... http://www.motoredbikes.com/showthread.php?t=9225
 
Last edited:
he actually validates my point, but I will get to that later.
Think as long and as hard as you need to, j-busted.

I honestly don't believe you understand what your point is.

I believe you are a troll, and that's a shame that people would listen to anything you have to say.
 
so let's get back to this consent issue grndslm.

what do your policies, rules, etc. have to do with me?
 
Your understanding is a big FAIL.

Oh, right, Mr Anonymous on the internet says I don't know what I'm talking about. He supports freeman theories, has acknowledged that they have no proof of success, but I am the one who is ignorant. Urr, OK! :boggled:

Well.. you see... I quote you all whenever you make an insane jump to conclusion. Pull that quote back into the present, and I will point it out step by step.

You've definitely been trained well by Darth Menard. I don't need to give you quotes to criticise, if you disagree with anything I've said, however, you're welcome to state your reasons and we'll look into the detail. That's how it works.

Til then I shall note that you have nothing but plenty of spare time.

You missed it, alright.

Indeed, I certainly did miss your teachings about the City of London Corporation. They aren't there.



:rolleyes:
 
it's right in front of your eyes. read post 5102 again
I'm looking, but I don't see what the POINT is??

Remember this?


That was you as well, so if you are in the states then was that a lie?
Why don't you link to that "QUOTE"??

That is the definition of a troll right there. Somebody who fabricates crap like that. Unbelievable.

Do you people actually side with somebody who spouts lies??


You're about as honest as Faux News. I guess it's ok to lie here, too... because this is just entertainment, right?

Oh, right, Mr Anonymous on the internet says I don't know what I'm talking about. He supports freeman theories, has acknowledged that they have no proof of success, but I am the one who is ignorant. Urr, OK! :boggled:
Remember how I said you make false jumps to conclusions.

I bet you can't LINK me to a QUOTE where I acknowledged that "freeman theories" have no proof of success.

You people have serious comprehension issues.

Also, you remember how we keep talking about RE-search??

You can dig thru all my posts and you will find me talk about no other state, for at least 5 years.

Discredit me all you might, but you will not succeed.

You've definitely been trained well by Darth Menard. I don't need to give you quotes to criticise, if you disagree with anything I've said, however, you're welcome to state your reasons and we'll look into the detail. That's how it works.
See here --> Freemen.Freeforums.org

Til then I shall note that you have nothing but plenty of spare time.
OK.

Indeed, I certainly did miss your teachings about the City of London Corporation. They aren't there.
Yes it is. I provided a link *and* the means for you to continue your research.

Define a municipality...

"Definitions of municipality on the Web:

* an urban district having corporate status and powers of self-government"

DON'T STOP SEARCHING!!!
 
Last edited:
Your assumption is completely false.

Like I suggested, ask the admin what state I'm posting from.
Like I suggested, review the posts of "grndslm" on the Internet, and you'll see that I am the same person, telling nothing but the Truth.
 
They can, but they don't... because they're stupid sheeple!

There are a dozen forums for freemen, most all with sub-forums titled "Success Stories".

Well, we were conversing. And that was a response to this....
......
You are talking about the Law of the Sea, not the Law of the Land.

In that case, you must do as the captain says or jump overboard.

It's not "the Corporation of the City of London".

The corporation's, person's name is, exactly, THE CITY OF LONDON.

What good do those words do me??

I promise you... if you ring up ANY police officer, deputy, or whatever in MISSISSIPPI... and ask them if they can carry a gun without a permit, they will say no.

If you read them the Mississippi Bill of Rights, even... which states...



They will not be able to provide you with one single possibility of carrying an "unconcealed weapon". You say, isn't a holster unconcealed? Nope. You say, what about a CLEAR holster... isn't that unconcealed? Nope. You could have your back toward them.

Even with these words, that they SWEAR to protect and defend... they still follow orders from their "higher ups", which ain't "the People".

PLEASE... Find me ONE Mississippi government agent that says I have the right to carry an unconcealed gun without a permit. WRITE HIS CONTACT INFO DOWN and then share.

Seriously, I triple dawg dare ya!

Foul, you can't go to I triple dawg dare ya! til you've gone to double dawg dare
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom