Breaking news! Truther Ignored by Senator!

[beachnut]

I may have referred to the subjunctive as a "tense," which it is not. I've never referred to it as a verb, though I could see that as permissible because it does have a specific conjugation.

"If [subject] was" functions properly only if this action were one that may have taken place and is under review. "I don't remember much, but if I was a jerk at your party, then I apologize." It doesn't work hypothetically.

OFF TOPIC take your nonsense to private messages and try to support your failed moronic claims with some evidence. Oops, you don't have any.

Never-mind!

You need to read the OP as your posts are moved to AAH!

100% impossible. That's just laughable. ...
Possibility =/= probability.

The possibility of 2+2=7 is zero
The probability of 2+2=7 is zero

What are you talking about? Have you had math yet?

911 was not an inside job. So the possibility and probability 911 was an inside job is zero. 911 inside job claim was made up by idiots who are selling paranoid conspiracy theories to those who can't think for themselves.

What is the claim? What is your point? Where is your evidence? Does Al Gore have it in his lock-box?

 

[TJM]

100% impossible. That's just laughable. Even if you had good points they would all be overshadowed by the absurdity of your thinking you can completely exclude all possibility.

Yep, 100% impossible. Do you have anything other than insults and your incredulity? If you do, I look forward to your detailed analysis here.

 

[leftysergeant]

I find it amusing that because you've heard this information before that it somehow invalidates it or puts you in some position of authority to dismiss it outright.

Actually, what is going on here is that the grown-ups like Maria Cantwell and actual engineers likek about half the people on this forum and old soldiers like about a third of us, and old fire fighters like myself and about four or five others here, as oppoosed to a drooling punk software designer like Rische, actually know that morons like little Dickie Gage and shrieking lunatics like A. Jones and failed scientists like S Jones and truely bat-crap crazy old biddies like Judy Woo-woo are full of of crap.

Rische is not in a better position than any of us to declare that sometbhing was wrong about the way the towers fell. None of those dimbulbs are.

No, don't even try to tell us fire fighters that steel buildings don't collapse in fires. We might be tempted to call you names that overstep the membership agreement.

 

[dafydd]

Yep, 100% impossible. Do you have anything other than insults and your incredulity? If you do, I look forward to your detailed analysis here.

Give us your detailed theory,Tempesta. Break the mould and be the first truther here to do that. They never do have theories,only ignorant nitpicking.

 

[tempesta29]

Actually, what is going on here is that the grown-ups like Maria Cantwell and actual engineers likek about half the people on this forum and old soldiers like about a third of us, and old fire fighters like myself and about four or five others here, as oppoosed to a drooling punk software designer like Rische, actually know that morons like little Dickie Gage and shrieking lunatics like A. Jones and failed scientists like S Jones and truely bat-crap crazy old biddies like Judy Woo-woo are full of of crap.

Yup. And the massive underground explosions at the WTC were just pieces of metal falling down the elevator shafts. And all the molten steel was just molten something else, even though some actually saw melting steel beams. And even though WTC 7 fell at free fall, well, no big deal. What a bunch of morons right?

 

[chipmunk stew]

some actually saw melting steel beams.

Nope.

 

[kerikiwi]

Yup. And the massive underground explosions at the WTC were just pieces of metal falling down the elevator shafts. And all the molten steel was just molten something else, even though some actually saw melting steel beams. And even though WTC 7 fell at free fall, well, no big deal. What a bunch of morons right?

All those things have been explained over and over again in perfectly rational, parsimonious and consistent ways. You, in your delusion (I am being charitable and not accusing you of deliberate lying), choose to ignore them and continue with your perseverative, irrational,complicated, inconsistent,false and mad ideas.

 

[DGM]

Yup. And the massive underground explosions at the WTC were just pieces of metal falling down the elevator shafts.

Who claimed this? Your handlers are feeding you bogus information again.

 

[Dragon37]

Yup. And the massive underground explosions at the WTC were just pieces of metal falling down the elevator shafts.

It was fuel traveling down the elevator shafts. There are witnesses to claim as much and the one person who claims bombs didn't see said bombs.

And all the molten steel was just molten something else, even though some actually saw melting steel beams.

How much molten steel? Do you realize that most, if not all, steel was recovered INTACT, as in not melted. If there was melted steel that does not prove the CTer's claims.

And even though WTC 7 fell at free fall, well, no big deal. What a bunch of morons right?

It fell at free fall for 2.2 seconds of 12-16 total seconds, so yes it is no big deal.

Now that you have rehashed your main points of conspiracy please give a more detailed description of how the conspiracy transpired. What's that? You can't? Well, then it didn't happen.

 

[Thunder]

What a bunch of morons right?

 

[tempesta29]

It was fuel traveling down the elevator shafts. There are witnesses to claim as much and the one person who claims bombs didn't see said bombs.

No, it wasn't. People thought the subway was exploding. Many people were knocked off their feet--to the ground. This was... wait, what are you claiming? It was kerosene that leaked down and knocked people off their feet?

How much molten steel? Do you realize that most, if not all, steel was recovered INTACT, as in not melted. If there was melted steel that does not prove the CTer's claims.

I'm sure most steel didn't melt. So what? The official story does not allow for melted steel, hence why dupes are so rabid to deny it. Defending the official story primarily involves desperate attempts to explain away countless anomalies.

It fell at free fall for 2.2 seconds of 12-16 total seconds, so yes it is no big deal.

Oh...

 

[tempesta29]

Who claimed this? Your handlers are feeding you bogus information again.

That's one I heard on this forum actually, from your ilk.

 

[JohnG]

The official story does not allow for melted steel

Do you have a story that does "allow" for melted steel?

 

[tempesta29]

Do you have a story that does "allow" for melted steel?

Sure: explosives coupled with some type of thermite.

 

[DGM]

That's one I heard on this forum actually, from your ilk.

Who?

 

[TJM]

Yup. And the massive underground explosions at the WTC were just pieces of metal falling down the elevator shafts.

Plummeting elevators would tend to make a loud noise when they hit the pits.

And all the molten steel was just molten something else, even though some actually saw melting steel beams.

Something else would be a product of your imagination.

And even though WTC 7 fell at free fall, well, no big deal. What a bunch of morons right?

Now you're finally starting to see. Now try reading.

 

[chipmunk stew]

I'm sure most steel didn't melt. So what? The official story does not allow for melted steel, hence why dupes are so rabid to deny it.

Nonsense. Personally, I think this is a silly red herring. I don't think it's true because there's no hard evidence for it, but you've been given countless explicit opportunities to explain why you think the presence of molten steel, even if granted as fact, casts suspicion on the conventional narrative of how the WTC buildings were destroyed. You have failed to do so.

 

[chipmunk stew]

Sure: explosives coupled with some type of thermite.

Have you ever seen a thermitic reaction? I'm sure you have, as you've consumed a lot of Truther videos.

How would such a reaction maintain the heat necessary to keep steel molten for weeks, when it was supposedly discovered?

 

[MikeW]

Yup. And the massive underground explosions at the WTC were just pieces of metal falling down the elevator shafts.

No, William Rodriguez doesn't really describe them as "massive underground explosions".

I was in the basement, which is the support floor for the maintenance company, and we hear like a big rumble. Not like an impact, like a rumble, like moving furniture in a massive way. And all of sudden we hear another rumble, and a guy comes running, running into our office, and all of skin was off his body. All of the skin.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0109/11/bn.24.html

And he told CNN what he believed to be the cause:

...I work at the building. I personally in charge of all the stairs, of all the maintenance of the stairs in the building. And I knew David for probably 15, 16 years.

And at that terrible day when I took people out of the office, one of them totally burned because he was standing in front of the freight elevator and the ball of fire came down the duct of the elevator itself, I put him on the ambulance.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0209/11/se.48.html

 

[triforcharity]

Sure: explosives coupled with some type of thermite.

Explosives don't cause melted steel. Sorry.

Thermite doesn't cause massive amounts of melted steel without being detected.