Breaking news! Truther Ignored by Senator!

[beachnut]

You still haven't sourced this claim.

All the people who flew with Hani agree he could crash into the Pentagon, and all your lies and delusions can't change their minds. You have failed to research 911 and it shows. Your flying knowledge is zip

You failed to research your own claims to see you debunk yourself. You have not got one conclusion right on 911. The terrorists have a better recored than you do.

What was your degree in? Does 911 truth tell you what to post, or do you make up this nonsense on your own?

 

[A W Smith]

You still haven't sourced this claim.

i sourced it several pages ago. Your short term memory gone?

 

[tempesta29]

All the people who flew with Hani agree he could crash into the Pentagon, and all your lies and delusions can't change their minds. You have failed to research 911 and it shows. Your flying knowledge is zip

“I’m still to this day amazed that he could have flown into the Pentagon. He could not fly at all.”

I cited the NY Times article several times.

 

[TJM]

“I’m still to this day amazed that he could have flown into the Pentagon. He could not fly at all.”

I cited the NY Times article several times.

His flight instructors seem to disagree.

 

[beachnut]

“I’m still to this day amazed that he could have flown into the Pentagon. He could not fly at all.”

I cited the NY Times article several times.

Oops, in that article it shows Hani kept paying for lesson in jet simulators. Means Hani was not trying to learn to fly, he was learning how to crash into targets.

You failed again, Hani did land aircraft, he did earn a Commercial Certificate as a pilot, things you can't do as you spew nonsense and imply Hani did not crash into the Pentagon. Is that a lie, or just your best failed claim? Are you upset Hani earned things you can't? You are not a pilot, you are not an engineer, you are a kid spewing nonsense on line who can't type more than one liners full of poppycock.

Did you flunk out of flight school? It is much easier to hit the runway and crash, than it is to land on the runway. Do you comprehend anything? What is your point; have you anything more than Hani cried; crying does not keep people from crashing jets. What else will you prove? Wait, you have hearsay! lol, you have nothing.

 

[JohnG]

tempesta29: Pro tip for you, in real life, people who have actually done the sorts of "badass" things you claim you'd do, generally don't brag about it on internet forums, or anywhere else, for that matter. That sort of braggadocio is generally more the modus operandi of insecure teenage boys and man-child armchair warriors who in actuality are usually as meek as kittens when not behind their keyboards. In any case even if you were willing and able to go all "Rambo" on the bad guys, what exactly is the point of bragging about your theoretical heroism to a bunch of strangers on the internet and of what relevance is it regarding the behavior of the people on the hijacked planes on 9/11?

You must be very young if you don't remember and/or don't believe that SOP when it came to hijackings was to passively accede to the hijacker's wishes. 99 times out 100 all that meant was at worst an unusually tense flight to Cuba. In fact it was seen as so routine and relatively non-threatening that it was fodder for situation comedies. 9/11 undoubtedly changed the rules and I don't doubt that many people; men, women, old and young alike would be much more up in arms if they found themselves in a post-9/11 hijacking. That however is completely irrelevant to how the passengers "should have" behaved on the flights that hit the WTC and the Pentagon.

 

[332nd]

Ok. I call.

0 for 1. Each of use had a component of the bomb & I assembled it in the latrine. Way to go.

Read. I didn't ask how they get the blades in.

P.S. I call.

Oh how did I get it to his/her throat? One of the others distracted him/her. I put it to their throat, dug in enough to draw blood, & hustled them to the cockpit.

PS. Theyre dead. 0 for 2.

I call.

Shlickt! 0 for 3. Wow you suck at this... how many have to die before you give up the plane? All we're going to do is land in Cuba & make political demands! History backs this up!

Yet none of those are stress related. They are purely emotional. None of those reactions is based on fear.

What?

 

[DGM]

Nice English.

Anyway, is this a blanket policy? Just give up a plane regardless of the consequences? I doubt that. These men had razor blades or some-odd equivalent. A pilot, regardless of policy, has a code, a personal one. Ask one. You don't just give away your aircraft.

What, you don't know? Were you too young at the time? Ask your Mom And Dad about it.


BTW: I'm from Boston, Nothing you can say about my English would bother me.

 

[DGM]

Don't look now DGM, but the internet tough guy caught you in a typo. I'll expect your resignation by Friday.

Yeah, the old your/you're. I hear many an empire has fallen for less.

 

[triforcharity]

So if I just ask a cockpit nicely to give up their controls to me... they should probably do it right? What would you wager on those odds?

0% now. Before 9/11, pretty good.

 

[triforcharity]

He begged his instructor not to make him land.

When was that? Do you have a date for that incidenct?

 

[triforcharity]

What, you don't know? Were you too young at the time? Ask your Mom And Dad about it.


BTW: I'm from Boston, Nothing you can say about my English would bother me.

Goddamn right!!

Tempe seems to think that it furthers his "cause" to point out the incorrect usage of a word. But, he has asked a few questions, without the proper punctuation.

 

[TJM]

When was that? Do you have a date for that incidenct?

Just because you "know how to land" doesn't mean you are competent in doing so.

http://wn.com/Hani_Hanjour

LOL. He "refused to land his plane or practice stalls in steep turns." They said he cried in the cockpit because he didn't want to land. He begged and pleaded his flight instructor not to make him land.

You people are just downright delusional. The man was a disaster in an airplane.

Part of the incredulity fest.

 

[Thunder]

You people are just downright delusional.

I will remind you of this statement, when you complain about folks insulting you.

 

[fess]

As if any of those pilots would have given up their planes to a couple of weaklings with one inch blades in the first place. Your belief in the official story is an insult to those pilots to begin with. I would dare you to come at me with a razor blade and demand control of a large aircraft with hundreds of lives on board. I mean that with all my heart. Never in a hundred years would you take my plane.

The official story is an insult.

No sweat Big Boy, I'll take that dare. Strap yourself into the pilot’s seat (if you can find it) in the prescribed manner (if you can figure that out) and kiss your butt goodbye. Do you have any idea of what it takes to get out of the seat?
Since you started talking about the aviation aspects of 9-11, you have done nothing but make a fool of yourself. Why, because you have no knowledge of the subject… at all. I tried to give you an article to read to enhance your learning experience, but you didn’t like the article because it only mentioned 757/767 once or twice. You wouldn’t read the article, but you would listen to some idiot that claims to be a pilot, call a descending turn a “spiral”. If you want to speak of aeronautics, at least learn the correct terminology.
Speaking of the “unsafe” maneuver pulled off by Hani, if you would do a little research, you would have found that it took longer to make that descending turn than it takes to make a 360 deg. turn at the standard rate of turn. It was deemed “unsafe” because it wasn’t a standard maneuver associated with normal airline operations, but I will admit that the coordination during the turn left a little to be desired.
There are a number folks on this forum that have actual time flying aircraft, both military and civil… a lot of time. If you were to clean out your potty mouth and act somewhat civil, I’m sure that they would be only to happy to answer any question you might have about powered flight.
Oh, by the way, the map of the flight path of Flight 77 you posted is incorrect for many reasons. Take a closer look at it, and you will see why.

 

[chipmunk stew]

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/6327464a8d1df34ec.png[/qimg]

..

 

[dc1971]

As if any of those pilots would have given up their planes to a couple of weaklings with one inch blades in the first place. Your belief in the official story is an insult to those pilots to begin with. I would dare you to come at me with a razor blade and demand control of a large aircraft with hundreds of lives on board. I mean that with all my heart. Never in a hundred years would you take my plane.

The official story is an insult.

You are an insult!

 

[WildCat]

You still haven't sourced this claim.

Your video.

It just writes itself!

 

[chipmunk stew]

Name a single time in the history of flight pre-9/11 in which the cockpit crew or passengers repelled hijackers.

Still would like you to name an example. There are numerous examples of successful hijackings, many even occurring after 9/11. Why did all these pilots give up their planes? You think they were cowards?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_aircraft_hijackings

 

[fess]

I just laughed out loud when I read this part. It was genuinely hilarious. This is a terrorist hijacker. He cries when asked to land a plane.

Yeah no big deal.

I would really like to meet the individual that wrote this article. I would dare say he knows less than you. A true practitioner of “truther” writing skills.