• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Breaking news! Truther Ignored by Senator!

Why would the plan be aborted?
It's actually much more probable that the plane crashed because passengers attacked the hijackers and aborted the plan. Oh , wait.. That's what you meant,isn't it?

As if any of those pilots would have given up their planes to a couple of weaklings with one inch blades in the first place. Your belief in the official story is an insult to those pilots to begin with. I would dare you to come at me with a razor blade and demand control of a large aircraft with hundreds of lives on board. I mean that with all my heart. Never in a hundred years would you take my plane.

The official story is an insult.
 
How much experience do you think Hanjour had at flight school doing dives as compared to flying level?

You mean in between his crying sessions? This guy overpowered an experienced flight crew, a guy who cried when asked to land?

LOL.

This is just funny that you believe this junk. He didn't just fly level. He navigated, descended and turned into a small target in an aircraft he had never flown. He was a scared, weak little man who was afraid to land. Those pilots just gave up that aircraft to this man... why? Because of his razor blade? Because he said he had a bomb? Nonsense. I'm surprised he was even picked as a patsy. That's the most unbelievable aspect.
 
No, you don't know that Hani did a damn thing on the aircraft that hit the Pentagon. You have no hard evidence for that, not even eyewitness testimony. You have a few frames of something flying into the Pentagon.

And you have absolutely zero proof that he didn't fly a plane into the Pentagon. The burden of proof rests with you because you are the one arguing against the "official" story.



Did you catch the lady that thought the subway was exploding? What was that.... a computer monitor falling down the elevator shaft?

Quote mining. CTer's like you seem to have a very hard time grasping the notion of looking at ALL the evidence and putting it all in perspective. Instead CTer's love to pick out portions of the event and fit it into their ideas while disregarding everything else.
 
As if any of those pilots would have given up their planes to a couple of weaklings with one inch blades in the first place. Your belief in the official story is an insult to those pilots to begin with. I would dare you to come at me with a razor blade and demand control of a large aircraft with hundreds of lives on board. I mean that with all my heart. Never in a hundred years would you take my plane.

The official story is an insult.

There were at least four people assigned to each hijacking team and that is more than enough to overpower the two pilots. Pilots and crew are also responsible for the the safety of the passengers and planes and when you have hijackers that prove to you that they are willing to harm other or claim they have bombs (as I believe they did on at least on of the flights) or use mace/pepper spray (as they did on Flight 11) it is a simple decision. Give up control and have a chance to protect your passengers or risk theirs and your life trying to be a hero. Keep in mind that the only people that knew what was happening is the hijackers.

My guess is that you would have probably pissed your pants had you been presented with such a situation.
 
You mean in between his crying sessions? This guy overpowered an experienced flight crew, a guy who cried when asked to land?

LOL.

This is just funny that you believe this junk. He didn't just fly level. He navigated, descended and turned into a small target in an aircraft he had never flown. He was a scared, weak little man who was afraid to land. Those pilots just gave up that aircraft to this man... why? Because of his razor blade? Because he said he had a bomb? Nonsense. I'm surprised he was even picked as a patsy. That's the most unbelievable aspect.

I didn't realize that you knew the hijackers so intimately. You sound like a scorned lover when you talk about Hanjour.
 
As if any of those pilots would have given up their planes to a couple of weaklings with one inch blades in the first place.
How do you know they were weaklings?

Your belief in the official story is an insult to those pilots to begin with.

The 9/11 "truth" cult and their laughably preposterous conspiracy theories are an insult to the pilots and all who died on the planes. By the way, what do you think happened to everyone?

I would dare you to come at me with a razor blade and demand control of a large aircraft with hundreds of lives on board. I mean that with all my heart. Never in a hundred years would you take my plane.

Ok tough guy, you've been in their situation before? No, so you don't know how you would respond. Stop insulting the pilots by implying that their actions were cowardly.
 
How do you know they were weaklings?

Read. Hanjour cried when he was asked to land a Cessna. The word 'pussy' comes to mind.

Ok tough guy, you've been in their situation before? No, so you don't know how you would respond. Stop insulting the pilots by implying that their actions were cowardly.

I'm implying no such actions took place. Come at me with a one inch blade, particularly with hundreds of lives at stake.
 
As if any of those pilots would have given up their planes to a couple of weaklings with one inch blades in the first place. Your belief in the official story is an insult to those pilots to begin with. I would dare you to come at me with a razor blade and demand control of a large aircraft with hundreds of lives on board. I mean that with all my heart. Never in a hundred years would you take my plane.

The official story is an insult.
people are murdered in prisons all the time with one inch blades, Besides the policy pre 9/11 was to cooperate with hijackers and allow the plane to land safely. Pretty easy to reach around a pilot who's strapped into his seat and slit his throat. No matter what your weight. What makes you think the pilots outweighed the hijackers anyway?

I would love to see you take on anyone weighing only 120 pounds who was trained at a terrorist training camp. You forget that Arabs from that region repelled Russian troops, Please why not go over there and show us what a he man you are? Afterward I can post a video of your beheading.
 
Last edited:
people are murdered in prisons all the time with one inch blades, Besides the policy pre 9/11 was to cooperate with hijackers and allow the plane to land safely. Pretty easy to reach around a pilot who's strapped into his seat and slit his throat. No matter what your weight. What makes you think the pilots outweighed the hijackers anyway?

I would love to see you take on anyone weighing only 120 pounds who was trained at a terrorist training camp. You forget that Arabs from that region repelled Russian troops,

Hundreds versus a couple. Do the math.

Policy? Do you think a man's brain is programmed with policy? A man's brain is programmed with instinct. Instinct says no. Instinct says you aren't taking my plane.

Once again, Hani Hanjour CRIED WHEN HE WAS ASKED TO LAND HIS CESSNA AT HIS FLIGHT SCHOOL. One hundred out of one hundred times I will wrestle that man to the ground and rip his face off. I will not put the lives of so many people in the hands of such a person--never. I'm sorry to hear you would.
 
I'm implying no such actions took place. Come at me with a one inch blade, particularly with hundreds of lives at stake.

Before 9/11, no one thought any lives were at stake. They thought it was a standard hostage situation and were trained to cooperate.
 
Once again, Hani Hanjour CRIED WHEN HE WAS ASKED TO LAND HIS CESSNA AT HIS FLIGHT SCHOOL.

So what? He cries, it doesn't mean he was physically incapable of overpowering or intimidating another man. I personally don't know how strong all of the hijackers were, nor the pilots, but of course I'm not examining this angle by making assertions such as you. How do you know they were all weaklings? Crying doesn't convince me.

One hundred out of one hundred times I will wrestle that man to the ground and rip his face off. I will not put the lives of so many people in the hands of such a person--never. I'm sorry to hear you would.

Ok tough guy, are you one of those face-eating chimpanzees? Like I said, you've never been in that situation and you don't know what you would have done.
 
Policy? Do you think a man's brain is programmed with policy? A man's brain is programmed with instinct. Instinct says no. Instinct says you aren't taking my plane.

Name a single time in the history of flight pre-9/11 in which the cockpit crew or passengers repelled hijackers.
 
Policy? Do you think a man's brain is programmed with policy? A man's brain is programmed with instinct. Instinct says no. Instinct says you aren't taking my plane.

That proves you would have never qualified as a commercial pilot, Ironic that Hanjour out qualifies you. :dl:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aircraft_hijacking
Dealing with hijackings

Before the September 11, 2001 attacks, pilots and flight attendants were trained to adopt the "Common Strategy" tactic, which was approved by the FAA. It taught crew members to comply with the hijackers' demands, get the plane to land safely and then let the security forces handle the situation. Crew members advised passengers to sit quietly in order to increase their chances of survival. They were also trained not to make any 'heroic' moves that could endanger themselves or other people. The FAA realized that the longer a hijacking persisted, the more likely it would end peacefully with the hijackers reaching their goal.This led to an escalation of attacks. First a few planes were hijacked and blown up on the ground, then hijackers began killing a few passengers to make a "political statement" this escalation continued until reaching the ultimate escalation on September 11, 2001.[5]
 
Hundreds versus a couple. Do the math.

Policy? Do you think a man's brain is programmed with policy? A man's brain is programmed with instinct. Instinct says no. Instinct says you aren't taking my plane.

Once again, Hani Hanjour CRIED WHEN HE WAS ASKED TO LAND HIS CESSNA AT HIS FLIGHT SCHOOL. One hundred out of one hundred times I will wrestle that man to the ground and rip his face off. I will not put the lives of so many people in the hands of such a person--never. I'm sorry to hear you would.

Hani flew flight 77 into the Pentagon. The pilots were sitting, facing forward, the terrorist did not ask to take the plane they cut the pilots throats. The terrorists are weak they had to use surprise to kill, weak like your no evidence failed attack on reality. The terrorist had to kill the pilot in seconds, or else the pilots can disable the plane in seconds.

You have no clue on flying issue, or physics. Why have you failed to make news with your zero evidence delusions? What will you do now? How about those Badgers?


The pilots on 911 were not prepared to stop being killed; if they suspected a hijacking, they would do nothing but land as soon as possible. You are not prepared to defend your idiotic failed fantasy on 911.

You are worse at defending your failed ideas on 911 than Hani was at flying. What did you call Hani? Hani completed his mission, your delusions will never succeed. Hani was a poor pilot, you are a failed truther.
 
Last edited:

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom