Breaking news! Truther Ignored by Senator!

[Craig4]

Of course we do know Hanjor and the other hijackers took control of the plane and then flew it into the Pentagon. We have video of the plane flying into the Pentagon. We have calls from the people on board telling us what was happening. Of course for the big one, we have no evidence of an explosive meaning on evidence for a controlled demolition. Tempesta, you got nothing. Get a new hobby.

 

[TJM]

Why hasn't any 911 inside jerb whistle blower come forward champ? You and your twoof tube tweenies have had nine years to show evidence, you have failed, Grow up child.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2409820436818244236&hl=en#

Google Video This video is not hosted by the ISF, the ISF can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website.

I AGREE

And suspended.

Must've been all that unpasteurized milk.

 

[chipmunk stew]

At what point is an angle steep?

An angle that presented the top of the building as a significantly larger target than the side would be steep in terms of one's ability to steer the plane.

 

[dafydd]

Shorter side? Do you know what a pentagon is? What is the shorter side of a pentagon? Why is math not required for 911 truth believers? You are doing a parody on 911 truth; right?

I believe that he/she is parodying a truther as part of a school project. Otherwise why bring up all these points that have been debunked a hundred times before?

 

[dc1971]

Yay!

LOL!

 

[triforcharity]

I posted multiple youtube witness compilations right after you initially asked for a source. You can hear it directly from them. Pay attention. If you continue to ask me for that which I've provided then I will just ignore you.

So, you posted a bunch of YouTube videos, and 99% of them describe the ******* collapse, and you want to ignore ME?!?!?

Well, color me suprised.....

"What was happening?" You're just trying to be annoying at that point. Don't presume that I owe you anything.

You don't owe me a damn thing. But, it's always a good idea not to quotemine things. That is why I ask that.

 

[triforcharity]

I love these kinds of posts. They're a good replacement for "I'm desperate and can't refute what is obviously eyewitness recounting of the event."

Says the one who posts YouTube videos that are all chopped up with very little context.

 

[triforcharity]

Really?

That is all.

 

[A W Smith]

That is all.

fixed your link

 

[triforcharity]

Thanks. Forgot to take out the unnecessary stuff.

 

[Andy_Ross]

tempesta29

If it wasn't the hijackers flying who was it?

If you can't or won't answer that question then;

Why did whoever was flying choose to hit the side of the Pentagon instead of your easier option of diving into the roof?

 

[kerikiwi]

tempesta29

If it wasn't the hijackers flying who was it?

If you can't or won't answer that question then;

Why did whoever was flying choose to hit the side of the Pentagon instead of your easier option of diving into the roof?

He thinks the planes were flown robotically, but has not attempted to say why the robots were so bloody incompetent. I think he is still mulling that one over.

 

[Thunder]

if the planes were flown by remote control, why did 93 crash into the dirt in PA?

 

[Andy_Ross]

Well, it obviously went wrong so they had to manufacture all the phonecalls and vicsims to cover it up.

 

[beachnut]

Still the distractions pour in. The Woo-theory cannot explain the molten metal in the basements, or the multiple explosions. Therefore it is a wrong theory. If the woo-contingent continue to give cover for the perps we cannot even have enough space to try and figure out who the perps are.

Aluminum was found, like the wheels of cars in the garages, but you always find molten metal in massive fires. Therefore you have no clue what you are talking about. Happy New Year. The key here is there was no melted steel. Get yourself a chemical engineer, or take a chem engineer class before you expose you have no clue.

The perps were 19 terrorists who exploited the hijacking do nothing mentality. Plus the skies over the United States are civilian controlled not filled with fighter planes ready to shoot down hijacker planes; read up on what was recommended for hijacking before 911; it was wrong we should have killed all hijackers as soon as they said this is a hijacking, or tried to interfere with aircrew's! Is perps a word?

You have failed due to lack of knowledge; you have a new year to make a pact to gain knowledge and stop spewing nonsense based on ignorance; can you step up to the challenge?

 

[A W Smith]

He thinks the planes were flown robotically, but has not attempted to say why the robots were so bloody incompetent. I think he is still mulling that one over.

yeah as everyone knows robots or remote control would be sawing on the control yoke as illustrated in the video i posted. dropping and gaining altitude, rocking left and right. I guess they had to program all those sloppy control stick movements to cover up the fact that Will Robinsons robot flew flight 77. I think our resident truther is lost in space between his ears.

 

[tempesta29]

An angle that presented the top of the building as a significantly larger target than the side would be steep in terms of one's ability to steer the plane.

Yet the building was hit at no angle other than horizontally.

 

[tempesta29]

if the planes were flown by remote control, why did 93 crash into the dirt in PA?

Probably an aborted plan.

 

[tempesta29]

Of course we do know Hanjor and the other hijackers took control of the plane and then flew it into the Pentagon. We have video of the plane flying into the Pentagon. We have calls from the people on board telling us what was happening. Of course for the big one, we have no evidence of an explosive meaning on evidence for a controlled demolition. Tempesta, you got nothing. Get a new hobby.

No, you don't know that Hani did a damn thing on the aircraft that hit the Pentagon. You have no hard evidence for that, not even eyewitness testimony. You have a few frames of something flying into the Pentagon.

Says the one who posts YouTube videos that are all chopped up with very little context.

Did you catch the lady that thought the subway was exploding? What was that.... a computer monitor falling down the elevator shaft?

 

[kerikiwi]

Probably an aborted plan.

Why would the plan be aborted?
It's actually much more probable that the plane crashed because passengers attacked the hijackers and aborted the plan. Oh , wait.. That's what you meant,isn't it?