Breaking news! Truther Ignored by Senator!

[tempesta29]

Are you for real? Of course you would have to dive steeply to hit it from above. Verticle being a bit steeper than horizontal and all. Please don't stop posting your dumbassery.

At what point is an angle steep?

Show me the "spinning around" in this video. Its in real time. Notice how flight 77 doesn't accelerate much past 300 until it is out of its turn at 1:21:35. he starts dropping from 8480 altitude at 1:18:10 and then realizes he is too high and banks to the right in your so called "spinning" 20 seconds later. This wide banking turn takes a full three minutes!!!

Google Video This video is not hosted by the ISF, the ISF can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website.

I AGREE

Yet this maneuver was considered extreme by those who tracked it, both in terms of speed and maneuverability.

 

[WildCat]

I posted multiple youtube witness compilations

Look at teh youtube! Look at teh youtube!

Where truthers do all their research and science!

 

[WildCat]

The point was obvious: it was a very risky maneuver.

OMG, he could have hurt someone!

Are you thinking about what you're saying?

 

[tempesta29]

Look at teh youtube! Look at teh youtube!

Where truthers do all their research and science!

Do you know of a better resource for 9/11 eyewitness videos? Let me know and I'll use that.

P.S. I give you extra extra long time for dis.

 

[WildCat]

I love these kinds of posts. They're a good replacement for "I'm desperate and can't refute what is obviously eyewitness recounting of the event."

Are any of those eyewitnesses truthers?

 

[tempesta29]

OMG, he could have hurt someone!

Are you thinking about what you're saying?

That... flying so close to the ground would be risky to his mission? Makes sense to me. Try reading instead of just taking quotes out of context.

Oh wait. You just like to generally throw out straw men cause it makes you feel cool. Well, I won't be responding to them anymore.

 

[WildCat]

For yay it is manifest.

Yay!

 

[tsig]

Yet I never claimed that one would have to dive steeply into the Pentagon to hit the top of it either. The building was massive. You would simply have to crash into it from above, just as any plane crashes into the ground.

As opposed to spinning around and trying to nail the much shorter side just meters above the ground as you take out lamp posts on the highway.

Then why didn't they crash it from above?

 

[WildCat]

Do you know of a better resource for 9/11 eyewitness videos? Let me know and I'll use that.

P.S. I give you extra extra long time for dis.

Are any of your eyewitnesses to The Truth^TM truthers?

I hope this question isn't too hard for you to answer!

 

[tsig]

So he just pulled this maneuver on the fly? Available evidence suggests he was not competent enough to do so.

Then who did it?

 

[beachnut]

...
As opposed to spinning around and trying to nail the much shorter side just meters above the ground as you take out lamp posts on the highway.

Shorter side? Do you know what a pentagon is? What is the shorter side of a pentagon? Why is math not required for 911 truth believers? You are doing a parody on 911 truth; right?

 

[tsig]

Let us not get distracted. The woo-based Arabs-alone theory does not explain the explosions. This is not going away. The woo-based theory is therefore wrong. Even before we consider the molten iron.

This is a proven matter. The woo-theory is wrong. The culprits are still at large. Do we know who they are? No. Because knowledge is not automatic. It must be science-based. We could find out who they are. But we have all this woo getting in the way.

Really?

 

[A W Smith]

At what point is an angle steep?

you cannot descend with a gradient of more than 15%

Yet this maneuver was considered extreme by those who tracked it, both in terms of speed and maneuverability.

extreme for a normal commercial passenger aircraft during its routine operations as was pointed out to you from a quote from an air traffic controller. NOT extreme for a hijacking.

 

[fess]

Learn to read. I said "this man wasn't a pilot who knew how to land at all".

Comprehension 101.

He passed a Private and a Commercial practical flight test. Evidently he did know how to land an airplane.

Comprehension 101

 

[fess]

Yet I never claimed that one would have to dive steeply into the Pentagon to hit the top of it either. The building was massive. You would simply have to crash into it from above, just as any plane crashes into the ground.

Flying an airplane isn't really that hard, but crashing is even easier.

As opposed to spinning around and trying to nail the much shorter side just meters above the ground as you take out lamp posts on the highway.

You claim that Hani wasn’t a good pilot, but now you have him doing aerobatics.

 

[funk de fino]

Yet I never claimed that one would have to dive steeply into the Pentagon to hit the top of it either. The building was massive. You would simply have to crash into it from above, just as any plane crashes into the ground.

As opposed to spinning around and trying to nail the much shorter side just meters above the ground as you take out lamp posts on the highway.

Two Stundies in one post. Too funny.

 

[Chodorov]

Still the distractions pour in. The Woo-theory cannot explain the molten metal in the basements, or the multiple explosions. Therefore it is a wrong theory. If the woo-contingent continue to give cover for the perps we cannot even have enough space to try and figure out who the perps are.

 

[Chodorov]

We should move forward. Since we know the woo-theory to be proven wrong we have to take a stab at who the perps are and how is it that they could have pulled this off. Usually people think the other way. Since this appears impossible for Americans to perpetrate, they then try and make a wrong theory right. Whereas the right way to proceed is to recognise that the woo-theory of Arabs-alone is totally untenable, and try and figure out how such an extraordinary mass-murder could have been effected. Then we can round these people up and slit their loathsome throats.

 

[TJM]

The Woo-theory cannot explain the molten metal in the basements,

Fire.

or the multiple explosions.

Loud noises.

We done here?

 

[A W Smith]

We should move forward. Since we know the woo-theory to be proven wrong we have to take a stab at who the perps are and how is it that they could have pulled this off. Usually people think the other way. Since this appears impossible for Americans to perpetrate, they then try and make a wrong theory right. Whereas the right way to proceed is to recognise that the woo-theory of Arabs-alone is totally untenable, and try and figure out how such an extraordinary mass-murder could have been effected. Then we can round these people up and slit their loathsome throats.

Why hasn't any 911 inside jerb whistle blower come forward champ? You and your twoof tube tweenies have had nine years to show evidence, you have failed, Grow up child.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2409820436818244236&hl=en#

Google Video This video is not hosted by the ISF, the ISF can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website.

I AGREE