• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Breaking news! Truther Ignored by Senator!

Thunder said:
um...all the sides of a pentagon, are the same length.
Click to expand...

Zzzz.... come on man. I'm comparing it to the top side of this three dimensional object. How many sides does a die have? Hint: six.

You're on a roll with this junk.
 
tempesta29 said:
"Yet this man wasn't a pilot who knew how to land at all."

Where in this statement do I claim he wasn't a pilot?
Click to expand...

You said...
tempesta29 said:
... Yes, that's how pilots who know how to land approach airports for landing, yet this man wasn't a pilot who knew how to land at all nor was he approaching an airport for landing!
Click to expand...
You failed he was not a beginner pilot he was a pilot who held a Commercial Pilot Certificate. He would know when he saw the Pentagon 20 or 30 miles away, he was not low enough to hit the Pentagon. So he descended by using a 360 degree turn, which will give him minutes to loose altitude and end up with the Pentagon still in front. You can do this yourself, by turning around 360 degree and you are back facing the same way. Darn, something we all learned in pre-school; did you miss that day? Staring out the window?

Your statement is pure nonsense, you make claims he was not a pilot who could do pilot things, or some other delusion. You are making up lies, false opinions based on ignorance. You have no clue what it takes to be a Commercial Pilot or why Hani might loose altitude by using a turn. You have no clue.

Hani had problems landing on a 40 foot runway; the ironic part about this, the Pentagon is not 40 feet wide!

Hani had no motivation to learn how to land when he rented time in a small plane. All he needed was some time flying, and aiming at the runway. There are many reasons why being able to point the plane and being able to hit the runway would not qualify you to be able to land safely. You have no clue what I am trying to say because you don't know anything about flying.

You debunk yourself!

77hanicntlandpentagoncansmall.jpg

Why getting close to a 40 foot wide runway, is good enough practice to hit the Pentagon, even if you are a bad pilot, a terrorist pilot. That is the runway Hani was having problems lining up to land on! No wonder Hani got the wide target.

The only pilots who admit they can't hit one of the largest office buildings in the world in the safety of a simulator are pilots for truth, p4t, the Balsamo brigade of failed pilots on 911.

You think your fantasy opinions based on moronic hearsay are evidence. They are the building blocks for failure in your case.
 
Last edited:
Chodorov said:
He ought not need to source it. Its ten years on and you ought to have seen the videos by now. Your faux-politeness is just a dishonest distraction. Its woo behavior. Woo-types who believe in the Arabs-alone conspiracy theories have to explain the multiple explosions. To wish them away like magic is Woo-behavior, immature and irrational.
Click to expand...

So, asking for a source is woo? Wow. Loose with the definitions in the truther camp, eh there sparkplug?
 
tempesta29 said:
Are you implying that all of those who were shaken, some off their feet, by massive underground explosions are lying?
Click to expand...

Source? (I am asking this because it is so vague, that I wouldn't comment on it, as there is no context. Before the collapse? During? After? Last week? When? Where were they? What was happening?)

So, source?
 
triforcharity said:
Source? (I am asking this because it is so vague, that I wouldn't comment on it, as there is no context. Before the collapse? During? After? Last week? When? Where were they? What was happening?)

So, source?
Click to expand...

I posted multiple youtube witness compilations right after you initially asked for a source. You can hear it directly from them. Pay attention. If you continue to ask me for that which I've provided then I will just ignore you.

"What was happening?" You're just trying to be annoying at that point. Don't presume that I owe you anything.
 
Last edited:
tempesta29 said:
"Yet this man wasn't a pilot who knew how to land at all."

Where in this statement do I claim he wasn't a pilot?
Click to expand...

This is called poisoning the well, and it is a logical fallacy.

He obviously knew how to land, given the fact that he had a CPL.

So, do you think that you get your CPL by just flying? landing you figure out on your own with OJT?
 
beachnut said:
You failed he was not a beginner pilot he was a pilot who held a Commercial Pilot Certificate.
Click to expand...

He couldn't land an airplane. I'd put him at beginner.

Your statement is pure nonsense, you make claims he was not a pilot who could do pilot things, or some other delusion. You are making up lies, false opinions based on ignorance. You have no clue what it takes to be a Commercial Pilot or why Hani might loose altitude by using a turn. You have no clue.
Click to expand...

Awesome paragraph.

Why getting close to a 40 foot wide runway, is good enough practice to hit the Pentagon, even if you are a bad pilot, a terrorist pilot.
Click to expand...

This fails on every conceivable level, but it's the absolute breakdown in grammar that renders it completely incomprehensible.
 
tempesta29 said:
If Hanjour had hit the ground at any point prior to hitting the Pentagon wall his mission would have failed.
Click to expand...

How long did it take you to figure this out?
Since he didn't hit the ground at any point prior to hitting the pentagon, his mission didn't fail.
 
triforcharity said:
This is called poisoning the well, and it is a logical fallacy.

He obviously knew how to land, given the fact that he had a CPL.

So, do you think that you get your CPL by just flying? landing you figure out on your own with OJT?
Click to expand...

Just because you "know how to land" doesn't mean you are competent in doing so.

http://wn.com/Hani_Hanjour

LOL. He "refused to land his plane or practice stalls in steep turns." They said he cried in the cockpit because he didn't want to land. He begged and pleaded his flight instructor not to make him land.

You people are just downright delusional. The man was a disaster in an airplane.
 
kerikiwi said:
How long did it take you to figure this out?
Since he didn't hit the ground at any point prior to hitting the pentagon, his mission didn't fail.
Click to expand...

No need to be redundant. Use that energy for some other purpose, like trimming your nose hairs.

The point was obvious: it was a very risky maneuver. On the contrary, he could have just aimed the plane down at the Pentagon, which is 30 acres from above.
 
tempesta29 said:
Just because you "know how to land" doesn't mean you are competent in doing so.

http://wn.com/Hani_Hanjour

LOL. He "refused to land his plane or practice stalls in steep turns." They said he cried in the cockpit because he didn't want to land. He begged and pleaded his flight instructor not to make him land.

You people are just downright delusional. The man was a disaster in an airplane.
Click to expand...

Dude, chill out!
 
dc1971 said:
Ahhh!! More YouTube videos!

The wonderful fact-laden resource!
Click to expand...

I love these kinds of posts. They're a good replacement for "I'm desperate and can't refute what is obviously eyewitness recounting of the event."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom