rumpel ... comprehend the absurdity of your proposition.
If I were to tell you where to research, it would be nothing more than a template for self referencing.
Go and read 'Book X' and then 'Document Y' would be a blueprint for the same information from multiple sources being used as supporting 'evidence' for the same conclusion. Go figure.
It would be self perpetuating, with a premise in the quantitative elements in contradistinction to the qualitative.
Which is precisely the flaw in the arguments you and your ilk offer; that being, you all reference the same self governing, self authorising, self referencing, self perpetuating 'authority'.
"Go read the law books"
"Refer to case law"
They're derived from the same source.
Worse yet, those who 'uphold' the law are 'schooled' in the same dogma, lecture the same dogma, advise according to the same dogma, are governed by the same dogmatic figureheads, the same 'schools' and possess the same unquestioning desire and ritualistic faith in the Temple from which the dogma is spewed.
It's cyclic and has no external reference point.
You're an intelligent being of life.
Capable of making your own decisions and demonstrating a level of free will ... yes?
"Go and do some research" should not present any form or hint of an issue or problem to you. However, should you find yourself having to refer to the same books, the same documents, or referencing the same perceived and indoctrinated authorities, then maybe, just maybe, that highlights the insular nature of your 'education', not an absurdity in the challenge itself.
Live a little.
Step outside the box ... the water's fine.