I am the first in the world

[dafydd]

In my book Who am I? you can read about chakras.
A whole chapter about chakras is waiting for you!

http://www.lulu.com/product/paperback/who-am-i/2294872

I'd rather stick forks in my eyes than read your book.Tell me what chakras are,and provide proof that they exist.

 

[dafydd]

In my book Who am I? you can read about chakras.
A whole chapter about chakras is waiting for you!

http://www.lulu.com/product/paperback/who-am-i/2294872

That only proves that your book exists.

 

[Marduk]

I am the first in the world who wrote a link between science and spirituality.
.

I thought that was Plato

 

[dafydd]

I thought that was Plato

He is the million and first.

 

[Mirrorglass]

Well, with a bit of work we can ensure that the number one google hit for this nonsense is this thread here at the jref forums. Perhaps that can save a brain or two from falling for this pseudo-scientific claptrap.

Please keep posting, and please be sure to include this in each post:
|ψ> = c1|Φ1> + c2|Φ2> + c3|Φ3> + c4|Φ4> + c5|Φ5> + c6|Φ6> + c7|Φ7>
are 7 states |Φi > because are 7 major chakras or energy centers.

Yes, I bet there are vast hordes of people googling that particular phrase.

 

[madurobob]

Yes, I bet there are vast hordes of people googling that particular phrase.

Well, sure, Alfa1 has not gone on his speaking tour and appearance on Ellen yet. But, just you wait and see...

 

[marplots]

Chinese scientists are using the country's most expensive ever science project, a light-emitting synchrotron, to solve the mystery of acupuncture points.

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2010-02/01/c_13159050.htm

This is very interesting. It was published 10 months ago. Have they had any results?

I expect that, as a respected scientific operation, they will publish both positive and negative findings?

 

[alfa1]

‎"The highest skepticism: Skeptic about your death"

Adrian Ferent

 

[Dancing David]

‎"The highest skepticism: Skeptic about your death"

Adrian Ferent

Considering that is out of blue, it may make sense to you but its is very opaque to the rest of us.

You have no evidence of life after death, life before birth or chakras that you have presented as of yet.

You have come to site that promototes questions, reasoning and critical thought and all you can do is hand wave and now quote yourself. Rather weak.

You can't even explian what you mean when you use the word chakra, you have presented no evidence but you quote yourself? Amazing.

 

[dafydd]

‎"The highest skepticism: Skeptic about your death"

Adrian Ferent

So we can take it that you have no evidence of the existence of chakras?

 

[dafydd]

‎"The highest skepticism: Skeptic about your death"

Adrian Ferent

I am not.It will happen one day.Any more meaningless quotes?

 

[Mahaha]

Why don't they ever answer? Isn't there one that instead of "just knowing" can prove something?

 

[tsig]

Why don't they ever answer? Isn't there one that instead of "just knowing" can prove something?

Those who know won't say, those who say don't know.

Oldest cop-out in the book.

Flowery language grows best in a garden well fertilized with bull dung.

 

[Fnord]

‎"The highest skepticism: Skeptic about your death" Adrian Ferent

Considering that is out of blue, it may make sense to you but its is very opaque to the rest of us.

It's both a 'non-Sequitur' and a 'Red Herring', in that it has nothing to do with the original claim, and that it relies on the emotional aspects of the topic of death to divert the reader from the fact that Adrian Ferent can not prove any of his claims.

You have no evidence of life after death, life before birth or chakras that you have presented as of yet.

Adrien apparently knows nothing about science, so what do you expect?

You have come to site that promotes questions, reasoning and critical thought and all you can do is hand wave and now quote yourself. Rather weak.

Actually, he seems to have come to the site to gain attention in the hope of selling his book ... but I agree that even this effort is rather weak.

You can't even explain what you mean when you use the word chakra, you have presented no evidence but you quote yourself? Amazing.

I think it's called 'Appeal to False Authority'. Yet, according to his Curriculum Vitae, he has been unemployed since 2005. I wonder why?

So we can take it that you have no evidence of the existence of chakras?

He has no evidence for the existence of his authority on the subject, and much less evidence for the subject itself. Ce te astepti? Cei care pot, fac. Cei care nu pot, predau. Cei care nu stiu nimic, scrie ficţiune!

 

[AdMan]

I think it's called 'Appeal to False Authority'. Yet, according to his Curriculum Vitae, he has been unemployed since 2005. I wonder why?

Turns out there's only three degrees of separation between me and Adrian on LinkedIn. Scary.

Adrian, I'm still not buying any of your BS books--sorry.

 

[Robin]

I thought the primary equation was b4I4q ru/18 qt(pi)?

In Australia it is b4 i√u ru/18 as far as I can recall.

Possibly only Australians will get this.

 

[Fnord]

In Australia it is b4 i√u ru/18 as far as I can recall.

Possibly only Australians will get this.

i√u should be i⁴Q

No, I'm not Australian...

 

[alfa1]

After death job: look for chakras!

Have Fun!

 

[Little 10 Toes]

alfa1, get off your trollerskates and answer some basic questions. Proof that there are such things as chakras and proof that there is life after death.

If you can't do something as simple as that, get back on your trollerskates and go somewhere else where people will believe your statements without any proof.

 

[dafydd]

After death job: look for chakras!

Have Fun!

Why don't you ever answer questions? Do you want a dialogue or are you just trolling?