I am the first in the world

[alfa1]

The Chinese are very interested in acupuncture:
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2010-02/01/c_13159050.htm

My theory is about chakras and can be extended to the acupuncture points.

I am a WAVE and the wave function is:
|ψ> = c1|Φ1> + c2|Φ2> + c3|Φ3>+ ... + c(n-1)|Φ(n-1)> + cn|Φn>
are n states |Φi > because are n acupuncture points or energy centers.

 

[AdMan]

The Chinese are very interested in acupuncture:
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2010-02/01/c_13159050.htm

My theory is about chakras and can be extended to the acupuncture points.

I am a WAVE and the wave function is:
|ψ> = c1|Φ1> + c2|Φ2> + c3|Φ3>+ ... + c(n-1)|Φ(n-1)> + cn|Φn>
are n states |Φi > because are n acupuncture points or energy centers.

Why is it that you are just spouting nonsense without addressing any of the questions and comments in the thread? If you refuse to engage in any sort of discussion, why come here? You already have your blog.

 

[Fnord]

The Chinese are very interested in acupuncture:
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2010-02/01/c_13159050.htm

Irrelevant to claim. Interest proves nothing.

My theory is about chakras and can be extended to the acupuncture points.

A theory is an hypothesis that is based upon an idea and backed by valid evidence.

Please provide valid evidence that chakrae exist.

I am a WAVE and the wave function is:
|ψ> = c1|Φ1> + c2|Φ2> + c3|Φ3>+ ... + c(n-1)|Φ(n-1)> + cn|Φn>
are n states |Φi > because are n acupuncture points or energy centers.

Please provide valid evidence that chakrae exist.

 

[Fnord]

Why is it that you are just spouting nonsense without addressing any of the questions and comments in the thread?

If you repeat a lie often enough and loud enough, someone will eventually believe in it -- just look what this practice has done for Christianity.

If you refuse to engage in any sort of discussion, why come here? You already have your blog.

Speculation: Maybe his blog isn't getting enough hits?

 

[alfa1]

For chakras read some Yoga books

 

[Fnord]

For chakras read some Yoga books

I have. "Asana Pranayama Mudra Bandha (2nd ed.)", by Swami Satyananda Saraswati; "Health, Healing, And Beyond: Yoga And The Living Tradition Of Krishnamacharya", by T. K. V. Desikachar; "Lilias! Yoga Gets Better with Age", by Lilias Folan; and many others. NONE of these "yoga books" presented valid evidence for the existence of chakrae.

Please provide valid evidence that chakrae exist.

_{(Hint: Assumptions, beliefs, interests, popularity, speculations and testimonials prove nothing.)}

 

[dafydd]

A lot of people are trying hard to link spirituality with science without success!
Are a lot of institutes involved in transdisciplinarity and interdisciplinary study of science and religion
http://www.metanexus.net/Here are more people interested in Transdisciplinarity - References:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transdisciplinarity

Please provide proof that chakras exist.

 

[dafydd]

For chakras read some Yoga books

Please provide proof that chakras exist.The books just say they exist,and that is not proof.Do you have any?

 

[dasmiller]

Please provide valid evidence that chakrae exist.

Actually, I'd settle for a nice falsifiable prediction.

 

[Fnord]

Please provide valid evidence that chakrae exist.

Actually, I'd settle for a nice falsifiable prediction.

Mneh ... I'm a little more hard-line than that, but a solid f/p would certainly be a step in the right direction.

 

[dasmiller]

Mneh ... I'm a little more hard-line than that, but a solid f/p would certainly be a step in the right direction.

Judging from the course this thread has taken so far, and from the sordid history of many, many "I HAVE THE ANSWER" threads, I doubt that either of us is going to get what we asked for.

But hope springs eternal.

 

[Fnord]

Nothing wrong with hope ... until it inspires inaction (i.e., "I'm hoping to win the lottery, so I'm going to quit my job"). I also hope that alfa1 won't disappoint us, just like all the rest have before him, but I'm not giving up my medical insurance.

@alfa1: Please provide valid evidence for the existence of chakrae.

 

[quarky]

quarky's single quark hypothesis encompasses spirit and science. But I don't want to hi-jack a perfectly good thread.

 

[Zanders]

Read at least a book about chakras...

Direct me to the book that presents scientific proof. I know what cakras are supposed to be

 

[Mahaha]

When you will die for sure you will realize that you have another body!

And you obviously know this because you have died and come back? Do you even listen to yourself?!

And seriously, stop avoiding questions? We know what chakras are, we asked if you can prove in any way that they exist.

If you avoid the question one more time you're going to look like a jackass more than you do now.

 

[quarky]

The after death possibilities of consciousness are speculation, but so are assured denials of the possibility.

 

[Fnord]

The after death possibilities of consciousness are speculation, but so are assured denials of the possibility.

Possibility proves nothing.

I believe in an 'afterlife', but belief proves nothing, either.

We will either know that there is an 'afterlife', or we will know nothing at all.

 

[alfa1]

Not easy to understand the chakras.
How I did more than 20 years ago:I read 3 acupuncture books; start with the acupuncture and maybe in one day you will understand the chakras.

 

[Resume]

Not easy to understand the chakras.
How I did more than 20 years ago:I read 3 acupuncture books; start with the acupuncture and maybe in one day you will understand the chakras.

You realize that using a book concerning an unsubstantiated treatment as evidence for an unsubstantiated idea is kind of . . . not a good idea?

 

[AdMan]

Not easy to understand the chakras.
How I did more than 20 years ago:I read 3 acupuncture books; start with the acupuncture and maybe in one day you will understand the chakras.

And where do I find credible evidence that acupuncture works? Are you going to direct me to a book on chakras?