You mean, they invaded the islands for the
South-Argentinian coast without hardly any defense from the British worth mentioning? We all know that the British consider territory in all 4 corners of the globe as their indispensible
Lebensraum, but I, the identitarian, am less impressed with this display of greed. The Malvinas have no business of being part of Britain (neither has Gibraltar, Scotland, Northern Ireland and a host of other territories).
You don't get to decide what land belongs to whom. The Falklands were British sovereign territory. Argentina invaded.
But OK, Argentina took the Malvinas that officially were British.
Britain/France took the German town Danzig from Germany in Versailles.
Yes. Germany lost the city because they lost a war. Has been like that for thousands of years.
Britain decides to take the Malvinas back in a war.
Germany decides to take Danzig back in a war.
If they had stopped with Danzig, you might have had a point. They didn't. They took the rest of Poland as well. For your analogy to work, Britain would have to have invaded and kept Argentina. They didn't, so your analogy is flawed.
Britain defeats Argentinian army and takes Malvinas back.
USSR (80%) + USA (15%) + UK (5%) defeat Germany and divide Europe amongst themselves for their Lebensraum.
Wrong. Europe was divided into spheres of influence. The western part kept their cultures and sovereignty intact. The eastern parts kept their cultures but became serf states to the USSR, the nation the Nazis were first to invite into Europe.
I am sorry I have to explain your own language to you, but starting a world war means undertaking action to ensure that parties all over the globe will be at war with each other.
It's not my language. I'm still not British, no matter how badly you need me to be. Let me educate you in how things work, though:
A conflict is also called a war. A conflict is started when the first shot is fired. The second world war in Europe started with the invasion of Poland by Nazi Germany. When the British and French honored their agreement with Poland, the war escalated into a global war. It was still started with the invasion of Poland. Is this still too difficult for you?
Now nobody claims that Hitler was looking for a war with anybody except Poland when he invaded Poland. I am aware that hysterical Anglos like to accuse the Germans that they wanted to invade the USA, South-America, Antarctica, etc. But serious people will confirm that Hitler was anxious that his actions in Poland would not lead to a wider conflict.
Yet. He had plans to invade the Soviet Union for additional lebensraum, as has already been shown.
It were the 'World Jews' (words of Chamberlain) who pushed Britain in the war declaration and hence into world war.
Wrong. No matter what quote from Chamberlain you have managed to invent, it was not the Jews. It was the honoring of an agreement with Poland and the desire to stop the mad hound in Germany once and for all that prompted Britain to declare war.
The war party around Churchill (Focus) obviously was well aware that American Jews would ensure that eventually America would join the war.
Jews had nothing to do with it.
Buchanan rightfully places the British war garantee and subsequent war declaration in the center of the events of WW2. 'World Jews', via their proxy Britain, started WW2 with the aim to destroy Europe and take it's predominant place.
Degenerate lies.
Not a bad remark. But it only brought the Soviets in the eastern half of Poland.
It brought them as far into Europe as the got after the war.
In fact the situation before 1914 had returned: there had been no Poland then and that was never considered problematic.
There was no Poland because Prussia had already invaded and conquered the territory. History was repeating itself in 1939, but this time aggression was defeated rather quickly in comparison.
But I am sure that we will agree that the Germans never intended to let the Soviets take over Europe.
Nor did anyone else in the West. You might have heard about a little something called the Cold War. I wouldn't be surprised if you hadn't, though.
This cannot be said of the Anglo's, who agreed in handing over half of Europe to the Soviets in Jalta.
Given the position of the Soviet forces after the end of the war that the Nazis started, the Western allies didn't have the forces, nor the force of will to prolong the war any further. Not that there weren't people who wanted to. Churchill, the person you hate so much, wanted to continue the war and push the Soviets back. The US general Patton offered similar requests.
The Jews and their Anglo serfs wanted to see Europe destroyed and take it's place and if it took an alliance with mass murdering Soviets, so be it.
Europe wasn't destroyed, and the Jews had nothing to do with anything.
That is why we still have an historic bill open with Britain, to be paid after the coming Soviet style demise of America.
What the hell are you rambling about?
But not justified claims.
Just as justified as Polish claims on Danzig were, and more so than German claims on the same city.
The Anglos sanctimoniously professed their belief in self-determination, except of course for Germany.
Wrong.
Some differences apply. Danzig itself wanted back to the Reich. Nobody denies that. End of story.
I deny that. You haven't shown it to be true, so I have no reason to believe you, as you have been known to lie a lot. What has been shown is that the majority of the German population in Danzig wanted to be reincorporated, and that the Nazi party had majority rule in the parliament. Your claim that 97% favored reincorporation seems to be just another figure you pulled out of your rear end.
Fact remains that Nazi Germany didn't stop with Danzig. They invaded and kept the rest of Poland, and invited the Soviets to pick up the scraps.
'Free City' is ridiculous.
No it isn't.
Danzig did not want to be a 'free city'.
Prove it.
Danzig was ripped off from Germany in Versailles with the intent of cripling Germany and cutting it off from East-Prussia.
Actually, Poland wanted the city as it was historically theirs. This was deemed to be too harsh on the mainly German population, so it was determined it was to be a Free City governed by the League of Nations. Reasonably so.
Not even Weimar had abandoned it's claim on Danzig (and even Posen, that in contrast Hitler was willing of recognising as Polish in exchange for Danzig and corridor).
Lots of nations has claims on land belonging to other nations. Invading a nation is still not considered acceptable. It wasn't for the Argentinians and it wasn't for the Germans.
By declaring war on Germany, Britain and in the background the US, prepared for the destruction of Europe.
Delusions.
This was not wanted by Germany, but it was wanted by Anglosphere. Hence did Britain ('World Jews') start WW2.
More delusions. Bring it on. It's making you look insane.
