Who started both World Wars?

[uke2se]

Moving the goalposts? We are promissed Lebensraum quotes from Hitler from the 30s and 40s and we are presented with quotes from Goebbels. Hitler was in charge, not Goebbels, so where are his Lebensraum quotes? Trouble delivering?

We have "Lebensraum" quotes from Hitler in Mein Kampf. We have the implementation of "Lebensraum" in subsequent orders from Hitler and Goebbels. Are you trying to hang your coat on the absence of the word "Lebensraum"? Are you getting that desperate?

ETA: The Obersatzberg Speech:

So habe ich, einstweilen nur im Osten, meine Totenkopfverbände bereitgestellt mit dem Befehl, unbarmherzig und mitleidslos Mann, Weib und Kind polnischer Abstammung und Sprache in den Tod zu schicken. Nur so gewinnen wir den Lebensraum, den wir brauchen.

Hitler's speech on February 3, 1933:

Aber braucht Zeit u. radikale Änderung nicht zu erwarten, da Lebensraum für d(eutsches) Volk zu klein.

That's two speeches by Hitler in the 1930's where he speaks about Lebensraum. You wanna try to hand wave this away?

And while your at it, since you are so concerned with territorial integrity, if we compare...

- Germany taking the German town of Danzig back
- Britain invading all sorts of territory around the globe (25% of the planet in 1940)
- the US currently having military bases in more than 100 countries and spending as much on 'defence' as the rest of the world combined

...where is the perceived moral superiority of Anglosphere, if I may ask?

So, it was ok for Hitler to invade most of Europe because Britain was a colonial power and the US had bases around the world? Talk about moving goalposts.

(BTW Britain will be a sad Islamic outpost by 2030 at the latest and the US will be fragmented by 2020)

Ah, more paranoid speculation. If that's what you keep attempting to pass for an argument, you will never get ahead in this discussion.

 

[Tolls]

Why does it have to be from the 30s or 40s?
It's right there in Mein Kampf.

ETA: Or what uke2se said...

 

[Hans]

- Germany taking the German town of Danzig back

Hans: In violation of a signed treaty and they didn’t just take Danzig they took all of Poland to include areas not –ever- controlled by the German empire. Why do you NEVER mention that? Oh that's right you're a liar, sorry I forgot, LOL

- Britain invading all sorts of territory around the globe (25% of the planet in 1940)

Hans: Nearly every country in world did that, to include Germany – remember her colonies, remember her many wars prior to WWI? Did you forget? Shall I list all the aggressive war the Prussians, Saxon, Bavarian, etc were involved with? The Teutonic knights? Etc, etc, etc

Germany invading Poland started World War II the most deadly war in history. Britain invading Oudh didn’t. Germany started world war 2

- the US currently having military bases in more than 100 countries and spending as much on 'defence' as the rest of the world combined

Hans: All of which if the nation hosting the base wishes can tell the US to leave or they have treaties allowing them - many of these bases were used to face down and defeat the world wide communist threat.

Germany invaded a non threatening country and not only took one small part they took everything then set about to destroy the culture - while turning the rest over to Soviets. They started WWII and helped to kill ----how many people? That is what you fun little dictator did.

...where is the perceived moral superiority of Anglosphere, if I may ask?

Hans: They didn’t start WWII by invading Poland – which Germany did

(BTW Britain will be a sad Islamic outpost by 2030 at the latest and the US will be fragmented by 2020)

Hans: Still unable to read the total number of Muslim’s in the UK is 4% just how is that going to happen – please explain? LOL

Still unable to explain why Hitler was a complete A-hole?

Hey here is a question if France, Britain and Poland wanted to destroy Germany - why did they allow them to re-arm?

 

[uke2se]

Let's hear about it from the horse's mouth:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ofCqQajbvg

 

[Hans]

9/11 often spouts off about Germany obtaining lands back from Poland - how did Germany (or Prussia then) get these lands?

They took them from Poland with Prussian aggression against Poland in 1772, 1793 and 1795 dismembered Poland

Note the area around Danzig (Gdansk) and who owned it prior to the Germans taking it.

Note too Russia's part in the assault and dismemberment - which it recreated along with the Nazis in 1939. What an alliance Nazis and Soviets

 

[9/11-investigator]

Let's hear about it from the horse's mouth:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ofCqQajbvg

You probably don't speak German otherwise you would never have posted this link, which proves my point. Hitler is talking about his nationalistic desire to unite all 80 million Germans in one state and nothing else. Here is Germany of 1914, which was never problematic to anyone (except Britain and France). No Poland to be seen:

http://www.taylorsvillelionsclub.or...dresources/World History STD/map34wwi1914.jpg

In this speech not a single reference to territories like the Ukraine, let alone Russia. If Poland would not have listened to Roosevelt and the Focus gang around Churchill (still in opposition in 1939) and simply would have allowed Danzig (officially ruled by the league of nations anyway and not by Poland) to return to the Reich and allow the Germans to build an autobahn to Prussia, it would not have to endure the fate of being ruled by the Soviets for 50 years as a result of the Jewish/Anglo/Soviet imposed peace. Poland believed the words of the Anglos, always a fatal mistake.

After the swift defeat of the Polish army, Hitler declared to be ready to talk about a new Poland (minus majority German territories), provided it would be at peace with Germany. But it never got that far, Britain and France declared war on Germany.

The essence of WW1 and WW2 was that Britain and France did not accept the existence of an 80 million state Germany in the heart of Europe, exactly as Hitler says in uke2se's video. The stupidity of both France and Britain in 1939 was that they had not noticed the emergence of new global powers America and the USSR and that their century old European balance of power politics had become anachronistic. Britain and France stared themselves blind on Germany and got annexed by America as a consequence. The British empire had only one true friend on this planet: Germany. Britain decided to destroy the only potential friend it had, due to Churchill who was bought with Jewish money. There is no bound to the stupidity of Britain.

The Soviet Union is gone. America is about to commit racial suicide, after Euro-America lost the struggle against the Jews. Let it go, nobody will miss it. There is a new kid on the block: a new Europe of more than 750 million people, from Brest/France to Paris to Berlin to Kiev to Moscow to Wladiwostok and to Anchorage and other future balkanized American and Canadian dominions, economically outperforming nr. 2 China by a factor 10. This century/millenium will be European. Again.

Thanks for proving my point. Keep the posts coming!

 

[Tolls]

Of course we accepted the existence of a German state in the middle of Europe.
After WW1 the idea of breaking up Germany into its constituent parts was discounted entirely. The option was there (and the internal discord would have made it entirely doable)...but Britain and France did not do it.

Sort of makes the bulk of your (and Hitlers) rant complete rubbish. But that's not much of a surprise to most of us here.

 

[uke2se]

You probably don't speak German otherwise you would never have posted this link, which proves my point. Hitler is talking about his nationalistic desire to unite all 80 million Germans in one state and nothing else. Here is Germany of 1914, which was never problematic to anyone (except Britain and France). No Poland to be seen:

http://www.taylorsvillelionsclub.or...dresources/World History STD/map34wwi1914.jpg

In this speech not a single reference to territories like the Ukraine, let alone Russia. If Poland would not have listened to Roosevelt and the Focus gang around Churchill (still in opposition in 1939) and simply would have allowed Danzig (officially ruled by the league of nations anyway and not by Poland) to return to the Reich and allow the Germans to build an autobahn to Prussia, it would not have to endure the fate of being ruled by the Soviets for 50 years as a result of the Jewish/Anglo/Soviet imposed peace. Poland believed the words of the Anglos, always a fatal mistake.

After the swift defeat of the Polish army, Hitler declared to be ready to talk about a new Poland (minus majority German territories), provided it would be at peace with Germany. But it never got that far, Britain and France declared war on Germany.

The essence of WW1 and WW2 was that Britain and France did not accept the existence of an 80 million state Germany in the heart of Europe, exactly as Hitler says in uke2se's video. The stupidity of both France and Britain in 1939 was that they had not noticed the emergence of new global powers America and the USSR and that their century old European balance of power politics had become anachronistic. Britain and France stared themselves blind on Germany and got annexed by America as a consequence. The British empire had only one true friend on this planet: Germany. Britain decided to destroy the only potential friend it had, due to Churchill who was bought with Jewish money. There is no bound to the stupidity of Britain.

The Soviet Union is gone. America is about to commit racial suicide, after Euro-America lost the struggle against the Jews. Let it go, nobody will miss it. There is a new kid on the block: a new Europe of more than 750 million people, from Brest/France to Paris to Berlin to Kiev to Moscow to Wladiwostok and to Anchorage and other future balkanized American and Canadian dominions, economically outperforming nr. 2 China by a factor 10. This century/millenium will be European. Again.

Thanks for proving my point. Keep the posts coming!

How about the other two speeches, 9/11? Pretend they don't exist?

 

[SanityGap]

.


In closing, another cite from 9/11's source ( this time, with a real, you know, citation and all ):

Die Nationalsozialisten errichteten im Deutschen Reich eine totalitäre Diktatur, begannen und führten einen Weltkrieg und verübten zahlreiche Massenverbrechen an ethnischen, religiösen, sozialen und politischen Minderheiten, darunter den historisch beispiellosen Holocaust an etwa sechs Millionen europäischen Juden. Diese Ära wird allgemein als Tiefpunkt der Geschichte Deutschlands und der Geschichte Europas angesehen.

Gonna translate that one for us, 9/11?
.

I think this sums it up. Says it all really.

"The Nazis established a totalitarian dictatorship in the German Empire, and began waging a world war and mass crimes committed numerous crimes against ethnic, religious, social and political minorities, including the historically unprecedented holocaust of six million European Jews. This era is generally regarded as a low point in the history of Germany and the history of Europe [1]."

 

[9/11-investigator]

I think this sums it up. Says it all really.

"The Nazis established a totalitarian dictatorship in the German Empire, and began waging a world war and mass crimes committed numerous crimes against ethnic, religious, social and political minorities, including the historically unprecedented holocaust of six million European Jews. This era is generally regarded as a low point in the history of Germany and the history of Europe [1]."

SanityGap keeps mixing up Poland with 'the World'. Hitler wanted merely his Danzig back, officially administered by the league of nations and 97% German. Danzig wanted to return to Germany and should have if the Allies had taken their own professed self determination principle seriously. It was ripped off from Germany after WW1. the Poles refused to cooperate, they wanted this German town for themselves. In this thread we have seen that it was 'World Jewry', as Chamberlain called it, who had pushed him into the war garantee and subsequent war declaration, that turned a local European conflict into a world war.

Regarding this 6 million story, SanityGap is invited to give name and proof of 1 single Jew who was gassed in an 'extermination camp'. Please in this thread.
Not millions, just one will do.

Success.

 

[TSR]

Hitler wanted merely his Danzig back,

.
Which, of course, is why he also invaded or attempted to invade most of the rest of Europe, North Africa, Russia and the with aid of allies, Asia.
.

officially administered by the league of nations and

.
Which is, of course, why he withdrew from the League of Nations in 1933...
.

97% German. Danzig wanted to return to Germany and should have if the Allies had taken their own professed self determination principle seriously.

.
Which is why, when the vote was taken in '33, less than half of Parliament voted for re-incorporation.

And all of which ignores that Hitler himself stated, in speeches documented in, you know, actual history books by actual historians such as, off the top of my head, Martin Kitchen "A Military History of Germany, From the Eighteenth Century to the Present Day" (full disclosure, "present day" was '75, according to the copyright page) flip flip flip lemme get the quote right flip flip flip thought it was much sooner in this section, Ah, here it is, about a third of the way down page 351 in my edition:

It is not Danzig that is at stake. For us it is a matter of expanding our Lebensraum in the east.

.
Are you *ever* going to actually learn about the history you're so rabid to deny?
.

 

[9/11-investigator]

.
Which, of course, is why he also invaded or attempted to invade most of the rest of Europe, North Africa, Russia and the with aid of allies, Asia.
.

TSR conveniently leaves out the war declaration of France and Britain as well as their invasion of Norway directed against Germany, that triggered the invasion of Germany into Western-Europe in the first place.

.
Which is, of course, why he withdrew from the League of Nations in 1933...
.

.
Which is why, when the vote was taken in '33, less than half of Parliament voted for re-incorporation.

True or not, what is the significance in the light of your attempted rebutal of the idea that the 'World Jews' started WW2 using their proxy Britain?

And all of which ignores that Hitler himself stated, in speeches documented in, you know, actual history books by actual historians such as, off the top of my head, Martin Kitchen "A Military History of Germany, From the Eighteenth Century to the Present Day" (full disclosure, "present day" was '75, according to the copyright page) flip flip flip lemme get the quote right flip flip flip thought it was much sooner in this section, Ah, here it is, about a third of the way down page 351 in my edition:

.
Are you *ever* going to actually learn about the history you're so rabid to deny?
.

Really, could we have the date of that speech containing? Ah wait, a little bit of googling discloses that we are talking about the 'speech' Hitler held on May 23, 1939 for his generals, right?

The speech was central in Nuremberg in framing the Germans. In reality the content is controversial, no wonder you have to refer to an Anglo book from 1975. Fortunately now we have Gerd Schultze-Rhonhof, 2005, page 338-342. First of all there is no transscript. A lieutenant Schmundt wrote it down from the top of his head, stating on the paper that it was not literally. Admiral Raeder denied that the contents was accurate. When confronted with the document he said (I translate): "in my opinion it is the unclearest document about a Hitler speech that exists, because a large number of statements do not make sense at all... it does not represent the character of the speech at all".

If however, we accept the document as real for a moment, we learn that Hitler said that he wanted to avoid war with all European states as long as possible, except indeed Poland. Interesting to note of course, that Britain and France and the US and the USSR had solved their 'Lebensraum problem' big time, Britain leading here with 25% of the planets surface captured. But for TSR this is of course not problematic. Because, you see, for Brits different standards apply. The UK can invade and colonize India, Palestine, Africa, Asia, whatever, it is just wonderful. But if Germany retakes Danzig after it was stripped of from Germany in Versailles, than Britain is fully justified in starting WW2. I predict that this kind of perfidious reasoning will have the best time behind it.

In the document as produced by the Nuremberg officials, there is indeed the phrase: "Danzig is not the objective. The goal is to extend the Lebensraum in the East and securing the food production". But from the resy of the document it becomes clear also that nobody is thinking of annexing Poland. A few months later Britain offers Germany a partnership and Germany show willingness to cancel the expedition against Popland. But then Britain does not follow up on the promiss (because of the pressure from the Focus group around Churchill) and Germany invades Poland.

Regarding the invasion of Russia, we are exploring here the Suvorow thesis that the USSR had planned to invade Europe in july 1941 and that Hitler was forced to carry out a preemptive strike. If that turns out to be true, than everything reverses and then it were the evil Anglos who allied themselves with Soviet mass murderers in order to destroy Europe, all in favor of the Jews, who run Anglosphere.

 

[uke2se]

TSR conveniently leaves out the war declaration of France and Britain

Has nothing to do with Germany holding on to all territories they conquered. Face it, you have been proven wrong, not least by Hitler himself. You know, the speeches he made that you didn't want to comment on.

as well as their invasion of Norway directed against Germany, that triggered the invasion of Germany into Western-Europe in the first place.

Germany invaded Norway before the Brits got there. Attempting to change history isn't going to work for you.

True or not, what is the significance in the light of your attempted rebutal of the idea that the 'World Jews' started WW2 using their proxy Britain?

Are those goal posts heavy?

Really, could we have the date of that speech containing? Ah wait, a little bit of googling discloses that we are talking about the 'speech' Hitler held on May 23, 1939 for his generals, right?

The speech was central in Nuremberg in framing the Germans. In reality the content is controversial, no wonder you have to refer to an Anglo book from 1975. Fortunately now we have Gerd Schultze-Rhonhof, 2005, page 338-342. First of all there is no transscript. A lieutenant Schmundt wrote it down from the top of his head, stating on the paper that it was not literally. Admiral Raeder denied that the contents was accurate. When confronted with the document he said (I translate): "in my opinion it is the unclearest document about a Hitler speech that exists, because a large number of statements do not make sense at all... it does not represent the character of the speech at all".

If however, we accept the document as real for a moment, we learn that Hitler said that he wanted to avoid war with all European states as long as possible, except indeed Poland. Interesting to note of course, that Britain and France and the US and the USSR had solved their 'Lebensraum problem' big time, Britain leading here with 25% of the planets surface captured. But for TSR this is of course not problematic. Because, you see, for Brits different standards apply. The UK can invade and colonize India, Palestine, Africa, Asia, whatever, it is just wonderful. But if Germany retakes Danzig after it was stripped of from Germany in Versailles, than Britain is fully justified in starting WW2. I predict that this kind of perfidious reasoning will have the best time behind it.

In the document as produced by the Nuremberg officials, there is indeed the phrase: "Danzig is not the objective. The goal is to extend the Lebensraum in the East and securing the food production". But from the resy of the document it becomes clear also that nobody is thinking of annexing Poland. A few months later Britain offers Germany a partnership and Germany show willingness to cancel the expedition against Popland. But then Britain does not follow up on the promiss (because of the pressure from the Focus group around Churchill) and Germany invades Poland.

Regarding the invasion of Russia, we are exploring here the Suvorow thesis that the USSR had planned to invade Europe in july 1941 and that Hitler was forced to carry out a preemptive strike. If that turns out to be true, than everything reverses and then it were the evil Anglos who allied themselves with Soviet mass murderers in order to destroy Europe, all in favor of the Jews, who run Anglosphere.

So you're just going to deny the contents of the speech? Ok. We have that speech by Hitler saying he wants Germany to invade Poland to secure lebensraum. We have the 1933 speech by Hitler saying he wants to secure lebensraum for Germany. We've already been through the Suvorov clap-trap. He was wrong, and he has been proven wrong. You circling back to a previously debunked argument when your current argument isn't working is only making you look silly.

Your lies have failed. You have been utterly proven wrong. Seeing you wallow in denial like this is just hilarious.

 

[9/11-investigator]

Has nothing to do with Germany holding on to all territories they conquered. Face it, you have been proven wrong, not least by Hitler himself. You know, the speeches he made that you didn't want to comment on.

I discussed and debunked the video you presented and could incorporate it in my case instead. So you are pushing it if you accuse me of ignoring you. I ask you again: present me with a quote and a source that Hitler publicly stated that he was looking for Lebensraum in the after 1933 as you claimed you could.

Germany invaded Norway before the Brits got there. Attempting to change history isn't going to work for you.

Thanks for admitting that the British tried to invade Norway. And as I remember from posts earlier in this thread some 8000 Germans imprisoned 25,000 British and French on Norwegian soil. In that order anyway.

Are those goal posts heavy?

Not with you around to help, thank you.

So you're just going to deny the contents of the speech? Ok.

The 'Nurembergers' were notorious in falsifying 'evidence'.

We have that speech by Hitler saying he wants Germany to invade Poland to secure lebensraum. We have the 1933 speech by Hitler saying he wants to secure lebensraum for Germany.

Give quote and link to speech please. So far you have not shown anything.

We've already been through the Suvorov clap-trap. He was wrong, and he has been proven wrong. You circling back to a previously debunked argument when your current argument isn't working is only making you look silly.

No you have not.

 

[TSR]

I discussed and debunked the video you presented and could incorporate it in my case instead. So you are pushing it if you accuse me of ignoring you. I ask you again: present me with a quote and a source that Hitler publicly stated that he was looking for Lebensraum in the after 1933 as you claimed you could.

.
Ummmm. Were you simply not able to understand the words 'Martin Kitchen "A Military History of Germany, From the Eighteenth Century to the Present Day," page 351?'
.

Thanks for admitting that the British tried to invade Norway.

.
Who has ever denied this, and what does it possibly have to do with Germany taking more than just Danzig, despite your lies that this wasn't their plan??
.

The 'Nurembergers' were notorious in falsifying 'evidence'.

.
Ah, so you can define what you mean by 'Nurembergers' and document, say, a couple dozen examples of this 'falsification' actually *accepted* by the IMT and say who was convicted on that basis?

No?


A dozen?


No?


*One*?
.

Give quote and link to speech please. So far you have not shown anything.

.
Because of course, if it doesn't exist on the 'Net, it doesn't exist.

Big building. Lots of books. Nice person to help you find book. Read read read.

Oh, and stop lying about history of which you are apparently almost completely ignorant.
.

 

[uke2se]

I discussed and debunked the video you presented and could incorporate it in my case instead. So you are pushing it if you accuse me of ignoring you. I ask you again: present me with a quote and a source that Hitler publicly stated that he was looking for Lebensraum in the after 1933 as you claimed you could.

You discussed the video but you didn't debunk it. I have already quoted a speech by Hitler in 1933 where he spoke of Lebensraum. I said Hitler spoke in public in the 30s about Lebensraum and I have presented a speech by him to that effect. Hand waving that speech isn't helping your case.

Thanks for admitting that the British tried to invade Norway. And as I remember from posts earlier in this thread some 8000 Germans imprisoned 25,000 British and French on Norwegian soil. In that order anyway.

Yes, Britain tried to cut German supplies by planning to invade Narvik. Germany beat them to it. Germany invaded first.

Not with you around to help, thank you.

Well, like most conspiracy theorists you seem to have no trouble moving goal posts all over the place.

The 'Nurembergers' were notorious in falsifying 'evidence'.

No. They were notorious for getting Nazis the death penalty. However, the speech was by Hitler, spoken in 1933.

Give quote and link to speech please. So far you have not shown anything.

I already have. Read up. Denying it won't help you.

No you have not.

Yes, I have, and others as well. Denying it won't help you.

Anything else you want to deny when you're at it, denier?

 

[uke2se]

Because of course, if it doesn't exist on the 'Net, it doesn't exist.

9/11's big problem here is that it does exist on the net and that I have already linked to it and quoted from it. You are seeing denial in action.

 

[Tolls]

SanityGap keeps mixing up Poland with 'the World'. Hitler wanted merely his Danzig back, officially administered by the league of nations and 97% German.

9/11 once again omits Hitlers track record. This is the same Hitler who "only wanted the Sudetenland back", and then less than siz months later invaded the rest of the Czech Republic.

Danzig wanted to return to Germany and should have if the Allies had taken their own professed self determination principle seriously. It was ripped off from Germany after WW1. the Poles refused to cooperate, they wanted this German town for themselves. In this thread we have seen that it was 'World Jewry', as Chamberlain called it, who had pushed him into the war garantee and subsequent war declaration, that turned a local European conflict into a world war.

9/11 once again omits to mention that Chamberlain's "world Jewry" quote comes from a single source, one who was noted for being, shall we say, less than pro-Jewish.

 

[SanityGap]

Regarding this 6 million story, SanityGap is invited to give name and proof of 1 single Jew who was gassed in an 'extermination camp'. Please in this thread.
Not millions, just one will do.

Success.

You ignore and hand wave away the huge amount of available evidence for gas chambers, why would anything I can provide persuade you to believe otherwise?
Care to find out what happened to the family of Alice Lok Cahana?
What about the family of Dario Gabbai? And what he did after they died?
What about the story of Morris Venezia and what he did?

Do you have a proper source for Chamberlains "World Jewry" quote? Thought not.

Success.

 

[9/11-investigator]

.
Ummmm. Were you simply not able to understand the words 'Martin Kitchen "A Military History of Germany, From the Eighteenth Century to the Present Day," page 351?'
.

You probably missed my rebuttal of that old stuff with the brand new Gerd Schultze-Rhonhof, 2005, page 338-342. We are suspending belief in anything that was delivered to us via the Nuremberg tribunal, which was victors justice. Universities need to and will be opened up for revisionist thinking so that a new picture will emerge of WW2.

.
Who has ever denied this, and what does it possibly have to do with Germany taking more than just Danzig, despite your lies that this wasn't their plan??.

So you agree that Britain and France initiated hostilities against Germany in attempting to cut off vital iron ore supplies via Norway? So why do you blame the Germans for defending themselves against this agression?

Another question, don't you think that 25% of the planets surface is little too much Lebensraum for our sanctimonious British friends? Nobody here ever addressed that point. Hypocrisy, anyone?

.
Ah, so you can define what you mean by 'Nurembergers' and document, say, a couple dozen examples of this 'falsification' actually *accepted* by the IMT and say who was convicted on that basis?

No? A dozen? No? *One*?
.

Because of course, if it doesn't exist on the 'Net, it doesn't exist.

Big building. Lots of books. Nice person to help you find book. Read read read.

Oh, and stop lying about history of which you are apparently almost completely ignorant.
.

Dozens? http://www.cwporter.com/mirth.htm

Among the official Nuremberg trial documents this beauty, a pedal driven skull bashing machine:
http://www.cwporter.com/pg15.htm
There are manymore of these examples.

We have the false Kathyn judgment concerning the decapitation of the entire Polish elite, the Americans let it pass to not come into conflict with their Soviet buddies.

There are several different version of the infamous Wannsee document, see holocaust thread. Dreamed up by chief Nuremberg hoaxer, the Jew Robert Kempner.

http://www.fpp.co.uk/books/Nuremberg/NUREMBERG.pdf

page 141:

Kempner’s behaviour with evidence was also highly questionable.
He would later turn up in German foreign ministry files the original Copy No. 16 of the Wannsee Protocol, and bestow upon it a wholly undeserved reputation as a key document in the Final Solution of the Jewish problem – despite the aura which now surrounds it, the document contains no explicit reference to the killing of Jews. Mysteriously, a second ostensibly original ‘Copy No. 16’ of this document, complete with GEHEIME KOMMANDOSACHE rubber stamps, began to circulate, whose existence naturally cast doubt upon the authenticity of the first.

page 354:

ON APRIL 5 the Americans placed before him a three-page affidavit,
which they themselves had drafted and typed, for his signature. Written
in English throughout, it contained the admission by Höss that he
had ‘gassed’ 2·5 million people at Auschwitz in addition to the half
million who had died there of diseases.

That's 3 million. Totally invented. In reality more likely 'merely' ca. 53,633 died (1 RF bombing raid one mid size German town). Hoaxers now believe without proof that 1 million died in Auschwitz.

Here is how "DOCUMENT 008-USSR" came about (Auschwitz story, invented by the Soviets):

http://www.codoh.com/trials/triussr8.html

The American Era is now coming to an end. The damage that the British have done to the white race is so enormous (starting WW1, WW2, Allieng themselves with mass murderers like the Soviets, the holocaust invention, terror bombing of Germany, not mentioning the destruction of Iraq), that this cannot be without consequences. Britain is the enemy, the greatest traitor of Europe and Europeans and will be treated as such.

'Mission accomplished', Churchill and his financier Baruch. Not difficult to discern who is the master and who the servant:

April 1961
July 1949
1952, Churchill invited with his friend Baruch in NY


Winston Churchill, bosom friend of 'Uncle Joe' Stalin, Churchill the destroyer of Europe, Churchill, icebreaker of 65 years of Jewish lead NWO, now coming to an end.

Timeline:
- coming years: the 9/11 crash of the American Zionist power structure
- Subsequent de-Zionization of American society
- opening up of the WW2/holocaust archives
- New general insights regarding holocaust, Jewish communism and Armenian genocide will become mainstream,thanks to the internet
- First films about the reality behind Nuremberg, the torture of Germans will hit the box offices
- The Brit will become the New German of the 21th century
- Britain will be an Islamic state by 2030, the self-inflicted final solution of the British Race.