Merged No Planes At WTC (Split from: WTC Dust)

Status
Not open for further replies.
WTC Dust said:
Ah, okay, I get it. You think there was a fake plane crash. NO. THERE WAS NO FAKE PLANE CRASH!!!!!!!

In fact, the videos of 9:03AM do not show any plane crash at all. They don't show a real plane crash. They don't show a fake plane crash.

So there was no one who faked a plane crash at the WTC on 9/11. They only faked the plane. If they had faked a plane crash, you might have seen some debris on the videos. But they messed up and forgot to fake the plane debris, so we caught them on it.
Click to expand...

Clearly, according to your retarded theory, they faked a plane crash. Of course I don't believe this. I am not insane. And, in your fantasy world, they did a good enough job to fool every sane person in the world despite the the worst scientist in the world saying they screwed it up.

But if you want to play this semantics game, fine. I'll refine the question. How did the NWO/Reptilians/Jews/whomever fake a plane flying towards the WTC, then make it disappear right when it appeared to crash into the WTC? How did they do this in front of hundreds of thousands of people from all angles without a single person noticing?

If you cannot answer, there is no reason for any sane person in the world to take your "magic trick" theory seriously.
 
Last edited:
WTC Dust said:
Ah, okay, I get it. You think there was a fake plane crash. NO. THERE WAS NO FAKE PLANE CRASH!!!!!!!

In fact, the videos of 9:03AM do not show any plane crash at all. They don't show a real plane crash. They don't show a fake plane crash.

So there was no one who faked a plane crash at the WTC on 9/11. They only faked the plane. If they had faked a plane crash, you might have seen some debris on the videos. But they messed up and forgot to fake the plane debris, so we caught them on it.
Click to expand...

Um... How can you not fake a plane crash, while faking the plane. Wouldn't that equal "fake plane crash" Or does that equal "faked-real plane crash" Or do we have a "Explosion in a building with holgraphic planes and faked holographic debris (the NWO forgot to edit in; with planted plane parts in the rubble pile and on the ground outside the towers) meant to look like a real plane crash" which probably still equals faked plane crash. I'll leave the explosion method up to you
 
dtugg said:
Clearly, according to your retarded theory, they faked a plane crash. Of course I don't believe this. I am not insane. And, in your fantasy world, they did a good enough job to fool every sane person in the world despite the the worst scientist in the world saying they screwed it up.

But if you want to play this semantics game, fine. I'll refine the question. How did the NWO/Reptilians/Jews/whomever fake a plane flying towards the WTC, then make it disappear right when it appeared to crash into the WTC? How did they do this in front of hundreds of thousands of people from all angles without a single person noticing?

If you cannot answer, there is no reason for any sane person in the world to take your "magic trick" theory seriously.
Click to expand...



Absolutely NOT! The perpetrators did NOT fake a plane crash.

If they had faked a plane crash, videos of 9:03AM would depict a plane crash.
 
alphahelix said:
Um... How can you not fake a plane crash, while faking the plane. Wouldn't that equal "fake plane crash" Or does that equal "faked-real plane crash" Or do we have a "Explosion in a building with holgraphic planes and faked holographic debris (the NWO forgot to edit in; with planted plane parts in the rubble pile and on the ground outside the towers) meant to look like a real plane crash" which probably still equals faked plane crash. I'll leave the explosion method up to you
Click to expand...

The plane was faked. The crash was not evident. The explosion was real.
 
dtugg said:
Clearly, according to your retarded theory, they faked a plane crash. Of course I don't believe this. I am not insane. And, in your fantasy world, they did a good enough job to fool every sane person in the world despite the the worst scientist in the world saying they screwed it up.

But if you want to play this semantics game, fine. I'll refine the question. How did the NWO/Reptilians/Jews/whomever fake a plane flying towards the WTC, then make it disappear right when it appeared to crash into the WTC? How did they do this in front of hundreds of thousands of people from all angles without a single person noticing?

If you cannot answer, there is no reason for any sane person in the world to take your "magic trick" theory seriously.
Click to expand...

If it was a real plane then the perimeter columns had to be prepared in advance to permit the plane to seamlessly enter the building. There is no other answer if it was a real plane.
 
WTC Dust said:
Absolutely NOT! The perpetrators did NOT fake a plane crash.

If they had faked a plane crash, videos of 9:03AM would depict a plane crash.
Click to expand...
So the witnesses saw a plane crash because...?
 
WTC Dust said:
Absolutely NOT! The perpetrators did NOT fake a plane crash.

If they had faked a plane crash, videos of 9:03AM would depict a plane crash.
Click to expand...

Every sane person in the who looks at the videos will say it depicts a plane crashing into the WTC. But we will ignore this for a moment.

I rephrased the question. You still ignored it. One might think this is because you cannot answer it. Let us try again:

How did the NWO/Reptilians/Jews/whomever fake a plane flying towards the WTC, then make it disappear right when it appeared to everybody in the world besides you to crash into the WTC? How did they do this in front of hundreds of thousands of people from all angles without a single person noticing?
 
bill smith said:
If it was a real plane then the perimeter columns had to be prepared in advance to permit the plane to seamlessly enter the building. There is no other answer if it was a real plane.
Click to expand...

There were no explosions evident before the tip of what is said to have been a plane seems to enter the south face of WTC 2.

There were also no explosions before what looked like the wings entered the building.

So it wasn't pre-planted explosives.
 
dtugg said:
Every sane person in the who looks at the videos will say it depicts a plane crashing into the WTC. But we will ignore this for a moment.

I rephrased the question. You still ignored it. One might think this is because you cannot answer it. Let us try again:

How did the NWO/Reptilians/Jews/whomever fake a plane flying towards the WTC, then make it disappear right when it appeared to everybody in the world besides you to crash into the WTC? How did they do this in front of hundreds of thousands of people from all angles without a single person noticing?
Click to expand...

It didn't disappear. It kept moving on the same trajectory.

The reason I have a hard time answering your questions is because you ask "how did X happen" when I'm not saying X happened.
 
WTC Dust said:
Any part of a plane that hit the steel exterior beams of the south face of WTC 2 would have bounced backwards in the southerly direction at the moment of impact. Not later. And not in the northerly direction or to the east. At least some of the plane would have bounced back towards the south if a plane flew into WTC 2 heading north. Since no debris was seen heading in the southerly direction, no plane crash took place at 9:03AM.
Click to expand...

What about the parts of the planes that hit the windows in between every beam?
 
WTC Dust said:
There were no explosions evident before the tip of what is said to have been a plane seems to enter the south face of WTC 2.

There were also no explosions before what looked like the wings entered the building.

So it wasn't pre-planted explosives.
Click to expand...

Instead of a hologram plane it strikes me that it might de a deal easier to make a hologram wall.
 
WTC Dust said:
They didn't see a plane crash. They saw a fake plane pass into the building, followed by explosions.
Click to expand...

No, they saw a plane crash. I've spoken to several of them & they all said it was a plane crash. Also all of the evidence points to a plane crash. Don't worry, everyone has to revise theories.
 
WTC Dust said:
Were any of these airplanes unscathed from the attacks?
Click to expand...

Why do you insist on the planes being unscathed? The planes were destroyed but they punched holes in steel decks and the pieces of plane went through the holes.
It's all very well for you to say that the plane should have bounced back butthe bit of the plane hitting the deck can't bounce back becaouse of the remainder of the plane that it is a part of being behind it and still moving forwards.

Do you think that the 9/11 conspiracy goes so far back that they faked aluminium aircraft punching holes into steel decks?

These incidents debunk your ideas that aluminium can't make a hole in steel.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom