Merged No Planes At WTC (Split from: WTC Dust)

[bill smith]

And nobody inside noticed a wall missing?

Holograms hide stuff like that. In any case the plane would have been under remote control and only specific areas of the wall would have to be covered. Money was no object....the taxpayer and all that you know.

 

[triforcharity]

So what makes the hole?




Oh BTW My partner owns a water-jet. I own a PLASMA cutter and a THERMAL LANCE!

So, you're behind 9/11 Aren't you DGM? !!

If that's your REAL name

 

[DGM]

There was no plane.

We talked about this earlier. If you need to ignore more then you except it might be time to reevaluate your position.

 

[bill smith]

Distraction. I'm really starting to enjoy you less and less, Bill.

So be it..

 

[dtugg]

It didn't disappear. It kept moving on the same trajectory.

The reason I have a hard time answering your questions is because you ask "how did X happen" when I'm not saying X happened.

That just makes your "theory" even more stupid. But I will refine the question for you again. How did the NWO/Reptilians/Jews/whomever fake a plane flying on a collision course with the WTC and have it keep going past even though every person who saw would saw it crashed it and no video depicts the plane moving past the WTC?

 

[fess]

100 days after the destruction (not collapse) of the WTC, you could still smell that weird stench from more than a mile away, where I lived at the time.

So, you live in the Hudson River?

 

[Unsecured Coins]

Can a hologram wall keep out stuff like... WIND? My god Bill, get a handle on that brain/ mouth thing

 

[triforcharity]

Ah, okay, I get it. You think there was a fake plane crash. NO. THERE WAS NO FAKE PLANE CRASH!!!!!!!

In fact, the videos of 9:03AM do not show any plane crash at all. They don't show a real plane crash. They don't show a fake plane crash.

So there was no one who faked a plane crash at the WTC on 9/11. They only faked the plane. If they had faked a plane crash, you might have seen some debris on the videos. But they messed up and forgot to fake the plane debris, so we caught them on it.

So, how did thousands of NYers, MYSELF INCLUDED see a PLANE crash into the building?

 

[WTC Dust]

I actually don't prefer to talk about planes at all, because I study what destroyed the World Trade Center.

The only reason I have a nuanced view of the plane aspect is because of so many people insisting that hijackings occurred.

Planes play NO ROLE WHATSOEVER in the destruction of the World Trade Center, and so they are not part of my research.

 

[WTC Dust]

So, how did thousands of NYers, MYSELF INCLUDED see a PLANE crash into the building?

You saw what looked like a plane pass into the building. You were fooled by the magic trick.

 

[WTC Dust]

So, you live in the Hudson River?

Draw a one point something mile circle around the WTC. I lived on that circle, on Bleecker Street, the same place I'm holding the seminar (only downstairs, not upstairs where I used to live).

 

[dtugg]

You saw what looked like a plane pass into the building. You were fooled by the magic trick.

Explain how the magic trick was done. If you cannot do that, there is no reason for any sane person to even consider your "theory".

 

[Andy_Ross]

If it was a real plane then the perimeter columns had to be prepared in advance to permit the plane to seamlessly enter the building. There is no other answer if it was a real plane.

How did Japanese Kamikaze aircraft seamlessly enter Aircraft Carrier Flight Decks?

Did the US Navy prepare them in advance?

 

[excaza]

Holograms hide stuff like that. In any case the plane would have been under remote control and only specific areas of the wall would have to be covered. Money was no object....the taxpayer and all that you know.

Holograms hide....airflow?

 

[bill smith]

Can a hologram wall keep out stuff like... WIND? My god Bill, get a handle on that brain/ mouth thing

You have a point. But if it was a real plane as you people say then the perimeter columns were 'softened' or prepared somehow. There is no way on God's Earth that an aluminium plane flew through those steel box columns without shedding loads of wreckage down the front of the building.

 

[Andy_Ross]

Holograms hide stuff like that. In any case the plane would have been under remote control and only specific areas of the wall would have to be covered. Money was no object....the taxpayer and all that you know.

Wouldn't the people working in the offices notice there was no wall there?

How did body parts and DNA from the passengers and flight crew end up in the wreckage of the Towers?

 

[alphahelix]

The plane was faked. The crash was not evident. The explosion was real.

If the crash was not evident then why on close up shots of the face of the tower we see a big hole with columns bent inward? Something large had to hit the tower. Unless thats a hologram too or picture and video editing. What kind of explosives bends columns inwards reverse-a-booms? Or was the explosion outside the tower? Still waiting for explosion method and type (So there not preplanted that narrows it down)

 

[excaza]

There is no way on God's Earth that an aluminium plane flew through those steel bx columns without shedding loads of wreckage down the front of the building.

Actually, there is. It's called physics. Learn some. In order for pieces to fall down the front of the building, the WTC would have had to stop the entire plane dead at the wall. Do you realize how much energy that would require?

 

[WTC Dust]

That just makes your "theory" even more stupid. But I will refine the question for you again. How did the NWO/Reptilians/Jews/whomever fake a plane flying on a collision course with the WTC and have it keep going past?

If you had stopped the question here, I could have answered it. A plane image isn't stopped by a material object. They made a boo-boo in not slowing down the plane image and adding plane debris. If they had done this, it would have looked like a plane crash.









even though every person who saw would saw it crashed it


Assumes facts not in evidence.


and no video depicts the plane moving past the WTC?

Demonstrably false. Google "WTC noseout". The plane image didn't stop quick enough. The nosecone of the plane image passed all the way through the building and poked out the other side.

bold is mine

 

[WTC Dust]

Actually, there is. It's called physics. Learn some. In order for pieces to fall down the front of the building, the WTC would have had to stop the entire plane dead at the wall. Do you realize how much energy that would require?

Why do you say the entire plane would have to stop?