• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged No Planes At WTC (Split from: WTC Dust)

Status
Not open for further replies.
WTC Dust said:
I'm done trying to explain the work of Judy Wood. Ask her if you want to know more details about her theory.
Click to expand...

I'm not asking for her work. You think it was a DEW. You explain your own ideas.

WTC Dust said:
No they weren't.
Click to expand...

What happened to David Angell then Dusty?

The guy is a world famous television producer, he absolutely existed before the attacks and he was even responsible for Frasier, one of the most popular sitcoms of all time.

He died on the first place to hit the towers, AA Flight 11. You are claiming the planes and passengers didn't exist, but this guy did. Where did he go Dusty?
 
Last edited:
WTC Dust said:
Because there were no planes hijacked on 9/11. At least you seem to be getting "the absence of evidence" concept. Good job.
Click to expand...

You mean the absence of evidence that the Pentagon would shoot down airliners that get too close?
 
WTC Dust said:
Since airplane crashes can't do that to steel framed buildings, asking a pilot for her expertise on 9/11 is like asking a plumber how to do the tango. They don't have that kind of expertise.

You know how to fly a plane. OK. .... and .... ? No planes means no planes. It means it doesn't make sense to ask for a pilot's opinion on 9/11.
Click to expand...

But planes can and did. Proven by the videos, radar data, forensic evidence, airplane parts, etc.

So humor me: why couldn't someone fly a plane from Boston to hit a building in New York? What is so difficult about it? I'm asking because you made it a part of your argument that there were no planes. Now you're saying it doesn't matter because there were no planes. That's circular reasoning.
 
The fact that aircraft number N612UA actually existed seems to pass the no-planers by. There are many photos of that exact aircraft: http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.search?regsearch=N612UA

Many pilots and crew have flown this very aircraft not to mention the flight attendants and the many people that worked on the aircraft either in manufacture or maintenance during it's service.

Anyone who has a remote understanding of aircraft manufacture and the role that Configuration Engineers play will know that this aircraft was real, not to mention all the flight logs and information that both Boeing and it's customers have on this very aircraft.

Aircraft and their components are strictly controlled by aviation authorities, so any change to that aircraft is documented and known.

For anyone to claim that this aircraft did not impact the south WTC tower, then they must explain and account for not only the aircraft, but also the crew, attendants and passengers along with any other data such as RADAR that shows this aircraft hit the tower.

It is not sufficient to simply say, "I do not know what happened to the aircraft and it's passengers and crew" if you are espousing the theory that this aircraft did not impact the tower. You have to account for the aircraft and it's passengers. That is the very starting point for anyone claiming otherwise.

Where is the data showing that this aircraft didn't crash into the tower? No-planers have none.

Every other aspect is moot. This won't change the religious, wilfully ignorant and down-right dishonest truthers who claim such nonsense, because it scuppers their entire false reasoning. That obviously inlcudes WTC Dust.
 
I wonder what kind of anti aircraft weapon could stop a plane barreling toward it at 500 mph? A stinger? Most are small and try to cripple a plane so it crashes. The mass of the plane will still be coming. Maybe they have a huge steel wall that flips up from and makes any planes bounce off
 
Originally Posted by WTC Dust
No planes means no planes. It means it doesn't make sense to ask for a pilot's opinion on 9/11.
Click to expand...
It makes even less sense to ask a pharmacologist.
 
WTC Dust said:
Something similar to, but not identical to, the F4 crashing into a concrete wall.
Click to expand...

And this comment takes what little respect I had for your investigative skills away. On what planet does the side of the WTC resemble a solid concrete wall? What's wrong with you?
 
Last edited:
WTC Dust said:
Advanced weaponry turned the WTC into metallic foam at low temperature, and the perpetrators put forth a cover story about hijackings.
Click to expand...
Evidence for such a weapon?

Evidence for metal foam?

Evidence for silly, giant conspiracy involving airlines, airliners, hundreds of lost souls, thousands of witnesses . . . etc?

Evidence that you believe any of the vomit-worthy claptrap you type?
 
WTC Dust said:
Advanced weaponry turned the WTC into metallic foam at low temperature, and the perpetrators put forth a cover story about hijackings.
Click to expand...


So, in order for your theory to be true, you must be able to explain what happened to the passengers on the flights. If hijackings happened, your theory is untrue. Explain exactly what evidence you have of the fate of four planeloads of passengers.

Remember, you cannot use the first condition of your theory (that a mystery beam did something mysterious) to prove the second.
 
WTC Dust said:
Advanced weaponry turned the WTC into metallic foam at low temperature, and the perpetrators put forth a cover story about hijackings.
Click to expand...

:confused:

This is one of the maddest things I have ever heard.

How on earth does steel get turned into foam and do you realize how HUGE this cover up would be?

Why did United and American confirm they lost two planes each? The only possible answer you can give to fit your theory is "they were in on it".

Well done, that's probably hundreds of people involved already.
 
Last edited:
WTC Dust said:
Advanced weaponry turned the WTC into metallic foam at low temperature, and the perpetrators put forth a cover story about hijackings.
Click to expand...
images
 
This thread is closed until such time as a Moderator cleans it up and issues infractions as required. As always, do not start new threads to get around the closure. You will have to wait until the thread is reopened.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: LashL
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom