• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged No Planes At WTC (Split from: WTC Dust)

Status
Not open for further replies.
WTC Dust said:
I studied TV Video Fakery for two years, and eventually threw it into the garbage can, embarrassed that it took me that long to debunk it.

TV Fakery says everyone who says they saw a plane in the sky that day are liars, and I just could never bring myself to do that. Too many people, friends and strangers alike, have told me that they saw (what they thought was) an airplane in the sky for me to call them all liars.

My friend stood on a rooftop at Montclair College in New Jersey, and said she saw the plane. I quizzed her backwards and forwards, probably annoying her, but she said absolutely that she did see the plane from the top of the roof.

A young colleague of mine said he saw it from out his window when he was in high school in Brooklyn. The man seemed to be transported back in time when I questioned him closely about it. He insisted that he, yes, saw a plane out of an open window in Brooklyn.

If the fake plane was a magic trick, it all fits. Eyewitness testimony, video and still photography, lack of a plane crash. It all fits.

A real plane doesn't fit because there was no plane crash and because planes can't do that to buildings, anyway.

A "faked video CGI-inserted" plane doesn't fit because of all the eyewitness testimony and videographic evidence.

A fake plane fits ALL the data, which is why I think it happened.
Click to expand...

Explain how they faked a plane crash in front of hundreds of thousands of witnesses and hundreds of cameras without anybody from any angle noticing. If you cannot do this, there is no reason for any sane person to even consider your "magic trick" nonsense.
 
DGM said:
So what makes the hole?


:confused:

Oh BTW My partner owns a water-jet. I own a PLASMA cutter and a THERMAL LANCE!
Click to expand...

The water makes the hole. An airplane crashing into a building is very unlike fast moving streams of water, so don't go working on the "liquid plane" or "self healing meat plane" theory. I've heard them all.
 
dtugg said:
Explain how they faked a plane crash in front of hundreds of thousands of witnesses and hundreds of cameras without anybody from any angle noticing. If you cannot do this, there is no reason for any sane person to even consider your "magic trick" nonsense.
Click to expand...

It took a few days before everyone had access to the videos showing the south face of WTC 2. I, myself, didn't see those videos for a long time, and did not watch them in slow motion until 2004ish.

Why do you ask?
 
WTC Dust said:
The water makes the hole. An airplane crashing into a building is very unlike fast moving streams of water, so don't go working on the "liquid plane" or "self healing meat plane" theory. I've heard them all.
Click to expand...
Obviously you have not been listening. It's all about the ability of the area that is impacted to resist said impact. Can you counter this?
 
DGM said:
So how can you comment on what sort of impact the plane would have on the building? This is the part of the building that was resisting the plane after all.
Click to expand...

What do you mean by "sort" of impact? I'm just talking an impact of any kind. Elastic, inelastic, or somewhere in between.
 
DGM said:
Obviously you have not been listening. It's all about the ability of the area that is impacted to resist said impact. Can you counter this?
Click to expand...

You'll have to state your argument more clearly and cleanly in one post for me to be able to tell you whether or not I have a counter.
 
WTC Dust said:
Can you rephrase the question? Obviously I missed something in your meaning.
Click to expand...

I don't think it could have been more clear but I will try. How did the NWO/Reptilians/Jews/whomever fake a plane crash in front of hundreds of thousands of eyewitnesses and hundreds of cameras without a single person from any angle noticing?

If you cannot answer the question, there is no reason for any sane person to take your magic trick "theory" seriously.
 
WTC Dust said:
You'll have to state your argument more clearly and cleanly in one post for me to be able to tell you whether or not I have a counter.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure how much simpler I can make it. Does it make any difference if a load is spread out over a large area or concentrated on a small area?
 
dtugg said:
I don't think it could have been more clear but I will try. How did the NWO/Reptilians/Jews/whomever fake a plane crash in front of hundreds of thousands of eyewitnesses and hundreds of cameras without a single person from any angle noticing?

If you cannot answer the question, there is no reason for any sane person to take your magic trick "theory" seriously.
Click to expand...

Ah, okay, I get it. You think there was a fake plane crash. NO. THERE WAS NO FAKE PLANE CRASH!!!!!!!

In fact, the videos of 9:03AM do not show any plane crash at all. They don't show a real plane crash. They don't show a fake plane crash.

So there was no one who faked a plane crash at the WTC on 9/11. They only faked the plane. If they had faked a plane crash, you might have seen some debris on the videos. But they messed up and forgot to fake the plane debris, so we caught them on it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom