• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
Myriad said:
Yes, and you obviously don't realize (even after he's told you) that Phunk was following up on jaydeehess's post responding to triforcharity's post, pointing out the ample sources of dust.

But I'm glad you agree that drywall and ceiling tiles would be crushed and broken in that "meat grinder" which would generate a lot of dust.

Respectfully,
Myriad
Click to expand...

I guess the- what is it ?- 500 miles or so of structural steel went the same way, eh Myriad ? I can show you a recent video in which that is abundantly clear. I mean the massive steel is not in the footprint 12 hours after 9/11. It is mostly gone. Show it to me in the video or forever hold your peace.
 
Last edited:
triforcharity said:
Why do you insist on it all being piled up all nice and neat in the footprint?
Click to expand...

There were 10 MILES of massive core columns fixed in the ground in the centre of WTC1 and WTC2. The buildings fell floor-by-floor carefully guilding all that steel straight down to the ground in perfect conformity with Newton's laws of gravity.

Yet Tri......guess what ?....the 10 MILES of MASSIVE steel is mostly GONE.


.....like you guys..
 
WTC Dust said:
Yeah. The building collapsed at nearly free-fall speed, which means that almost 100% of the potential energy was converted into kinetic energy.

Where did all this energy come from to destroy the buildings?
Click to expand...
The cranes that lifted the steel and the rest of the building materials up in the first place. Add to that the elevators that brought all the building contents up. We can simplify this by saying gravity. I see you said "nearly" free-fall. There's your answer.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
There were 10 MILES of massive core columns fixed in the ground in the centre of WTC1 and WTC2. The buildings fell floor-by-floor carefully guilding all that steel straight down to the ground in perfect conformity with Newton's laws of gravity.

Yet Tri......guess what ?....the 10 MILES of MASSIVE steel is mostly GONE.


.....like you guys..
Click to expand...

So you're still expecting it all to be piled up nice and neat with a big sign saying "core Columns" on it?

You're crazy.

I've shown you plenty of pictures of core columns. Why do you insist on being a jackass?
 
Myriad said:
The same way as what? You mean down toward the ground? Yes, I'd say so.

Respectfully,
Myriad
Click to expand...

In that direction I guess. It just didn't stay on the ground...I can show you the recent video released under duress by NIST.
 
triforcharity said:
So you're still expecting it all to be piled up nice and neat with a big sign saying "core Columns" on it?

You're crazy.

I've shown you plenty of pictures of core columns. Why do you insist on being a jackass?
Click to expand...

Not to worry. We will just heep plugging this knowing that you have zero credible comeback. Shilldom is done Tri. This video is worth 10,000 words. You know it.
 
Last edited:
triforcharity said:
Desperation? Do you realize how BIG of an area that is?
Click to expand...

The footprints of WTC1 and WTC2 were 208 feet x 208 feet readers. The core columns are for the most part missing. 10 MILES of MASSIVE core columns (per building).

Check the FOIA video release in a post above.
 
bill smith said:
The footprints of WTC1 and WTC2 were 208 feet x 208 feet readers. The core columns are for the most part missing. 10 MILES of MASSIVE core columns (per building).

Check the FOIA video release in a post above.
Click to expand...
What is the actual volume your "10 miles of massive core columns" would take up?


Are you up-set WTC Dust is getting more attention then you?
 
bill smith said:
What a joke. Have a look at his link Readers. This is his idea of the wreckage of two half-million ton buildings and sundry other smaller skyscrapers.

Have you ever seen desperation to match this ? lol
Click to expand...

OK. I looked at his link. Now what? You plainly think that shows less than a million tons of debris. Well, how many tons do you suggest it does show?
 
DGM said:
What is the actual volume your "10 miles of massive core columns" would take up?


Are you up-set WTC Dust is getting more attention then you?
Click to expand...


Work it out for yourself . I think the Readers get the picture of a missing 10 MILES if MASSIVE core columns. That will do me.
 
bill smith said:
Work it out for yourself . I think the Readers get the picture of a missing 10 MILES if MASSIVE core columns. That will do me.
Click to expand...

I'd like to work it out for myself. You say there was an amount of steel 10 miles by something by something. Got the missing numbers?
 
Jack by the hedge said:
I'd like to work it out for myself. You say there was an amount of steel 10 miles by something by something. Got the missing numbers?
Click to expand...

No but I have some great pictures of core columns that I can post. Then we can ask the Readers to imagine 10 MILES of the same.....just plain missing.

. You can go by the numbers if you wish. I will stress the visuals. Have fun.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom