• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
Your analogy kinda sucks. Your villagers are faced with evidence in the form of a woman who looks like she was run through with a pike or something, but witnesses who say there was a noise like thunder and she just fell down. It makes no sense to them.

If your story was that instead of shooting her, you stabbed her then tasered her, which stopped her heart, then you'd have a better analogy. The witnesses would have seen her stabbed, which they understand, but might argue over whether the stabbing wound was severe enough to kill a person.

Don't you think that analogy is closer?

Of course the weakness of your argument is that the stabbing wound was severe enough to kill, and the witnesses didn't see you hit her with anything else, and there are no other marks on the body so I guess you just made the taser bit up.
 
WTC Dust said:
You keep acting like I don't know how to do calculations
Click to expand...

I'm not asking you to do any calculations. I'm asking you to a.) put some prepared samples in vials, place them in a machine, and hit a button and b.) to put some prepared samples in a machine, and push a button.

For some reason, you have been unable to do this, yet you don't hesitate to make conclusions based on absolutely nothing.
 
Last edited:
WTC Dust said:
When I'm merely unwilling to do unhelpful calculations at the request of meanies.
Click to expand...

So you're unwilling, as someone who claims to be a scientist, to do science, and requests for you to do so are mean. Wonderful.
 
phunk said:
Keep beating that strawman. No one is claiming that dust came from the plane crash. The dust came from the building collapses.
Click to expand...

In fact, if we restrict our attention to her sample, we can't even say that it came from building collapses. As far as I can tell, any source of dust near the roof of that building (construction work at any time in the life of the building, say) may account for some or all of her sample. It seems plausible that some of the dust from the collapse of the towers ended up in the nook, I suppose, but she doesn't know *when* the bulk of the dust was deposited there, as far as I know.

She has not given any evidence that this dust was deposited there on or around 9/11, has she?
 
WTC Dust said:
I'm a very entertaining and funny person. I'm not a drag or a bore.
Click to expand...

You know what I think? I think the more times a person repeats the claim that she is funny and entertaining, the funnier and more entertaining that person is. I don't know of any better way to be sure that a person is funny than that they repeatedly tell you so.

By this metric, you're a remarkably funny and entertaining person! Congrats!
 
WTC Dust said:
Oh, Beachnut. You're so persistent. I'm already starting to like you. Bashing my credentials really isn't going to work out for you, because I'm solid. Try debunking the science, kk? Or actually, what I'd like you to do is to debunk the science of Dr. Judy Wood, or try to. Insults don't actually debunk anything, by the way, although they seem to make you feel good about yourself.
Click to expand...

Muzicmaker2001, is that you?
 
WTC Dust said:
...
This isn't what happened. Explosives did not take down the World Trade Center. An electrical weapon did. ...
Click to expand...
A toaster in the dining room.

A soldering iron in the living room...

A frayed wire in the hallway...

A microwave heating water...

Wait, I have seen a microwave start a big fire, cooking a potato to a crisp and lighting nearby paper on fire due to the extreme heat.

Your fantasy knows no bounds as you SPAM the forum which discusses the nut case ideas of 911, and how stupid they are.
 
phiwum said:
In fact, if we restrict our attention to her sample, we can't even say that it came from building collapses. As far as I can tell, any source of dust near the roof of that building (construction work at any time in the life of the building, say) may account for some or all of her sample. It seems plausible that some of the dust from the collapse of the towers ended up in the nook, I suppose, but she doesn't know *when* the bulk of the dust was deposited there, as far as I know.

She has not given any evidence that this dust was deposited there on or around 9/11, has she?
Click to expand...

I haven't given the evidence that it was found near the WTC, no.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom