• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
Evidence of hijackings?

Hmm, let's see. We have the records of flights taking off from the airports. We have credit card receipts from the persons who bought tickets on the two flights (which I believe includes the ones the hijackers bought). We have the flight recorders which, while badly damaged, were actually recovered from the WTC site. We have radar records which show the two flights on their trajectories for the majority of the time they were heading for New York. We have the word of thousands of eyewitnesses who were IN New York City on 9/11 who all say they saw planes crash into the buildings. We have the people on those flights who have been identified via DNA recovered on site at the WTC. We have the video footage which shows the plane(s) flying into the buildings. We have the plane parts which were recovered from the WTC site, as well as numerous nearby locations in downtown Manhattan. There is a virtual TON of physical evidence showing that planes crashed into the towers, Dusty; anyone who dismisses said evidence becomes sadly delusional in my book. Maybe, if you did a little more research and spent a little less time tooting your own horn, you'd come to realize the lunacy of your theory.
 
New FOIA release

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hBTRwAAgwI&feature=player_embedded#!


There is so little wreckage at ground zero that even 9/11 Blogger is forced to admit it. They are walking stiffly towards Judy Wood it seems

Quote:
'' Amazingly, after 220 stories of buildings “collapsed” into the streets right below, the streets were quite walkable for the rescue personnel. Shouldn’t there be a massive pile of a building, TIMES 2?''

http://911blogger.com/news/2010-11-...11-ground-zero-after-midnightand-molten-metal
 
Last edited:
WTC Dust said:
That would be the definitive experiment, wouldn't it? I'll let you know if I ever get to perform this experiment. I've got my friend in Houston working on a scale model of the WTC made of steel, and John Hutchison is selling his equipment. If I could only afford the 50 thousand dollars he is charging, I might be able to do exactly what you suggest.

One of my other ideas of how to accomplish this was to visit Mel Winfield and see if he would allow me to try out his portable device that he claimed worked better than John Hutchison's equipment, but now that I find out he is deceased, I have to think about another strategy.
Click to expand...

Well then you really do have a problem then dont you. You are postulating a weapon that exceeds the abilities of known science and technology and cannot demonstrate a bit of evidence at all that such a thing exists without using a circular arguement;
'yes there is evidence, it was used on 9/11, therefore it existed to be used,,, QED'.
 
bill smith said:
New FOIA release

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hBTRwAAgwI&feature=player_embedded#!


There is so little wreckage at ground zero that even 9/11 Blogger is forced to admit it. They are walking towards Judy Wood it seems

Quote:
'' Amazingly, after 220 stories of buildings “collapsed” into the streets right below, the streets were quite walkable for the rescue personnel. Shouldn’t there be a massive pile of a building, TIMES 2?''

http://911blogger.com/news/2010-11-...11-ground-zero-after-midnightand-molten-metal
Click to expand...

Did it even occur to you to ask 'which streets?'

Of course there were walkable streets, outside the rubble pile. It's not like the pile covered the whole city.
 
jaydeehess said:
fixed that for you trifc
Click to expand...

I agree. I came up with a rough figure ITT of about 47,000 sheets of drywall IIRC just for the PERIMETER columns.

I couldn't get enough data to do an estimate for the interior around the core area.

But yes, you are absolutely correct.
 
bill smith said:
Crushed and broken or uncrushed and unbroken ? Say....how could that be after coming from a meat-grinder like that ?
Click to expand...

Yeah. The building collapsed at nearly free-fall speed, which means that almost 100% of the potential energy was converted into kinetic energy.

Where did all this energy come from to destroy the buildings?
 
bill smith said:
Crushed and broken or uncrushed and unbroken ? Say....how could that be after coming from a meat-grinder like that ?
Click to expand...


All that drywall crushed and broken, you say? Wow, that must have made a lot of dust. Did anyone notice any dust?

(Bill: sometimes you need to read more than two or three posts back, to figure out which side to troll.)

Respectfully,
Myriad
 
phunk said:
Did it even occur to you to ask 'which streets?'

Of course there were walkable streets, outside the rubble pile. It's not like the pile covered the whole city.
Click to expand...

No I am talking about there being almost no rubble in the footprints of the Twin Towers themselves let alone the surrounding streets. I invite the Readers to watch the video in the post above (number 2734) about the new FOIA release. You can see the firemen strolling around close to the stiill-standing and leaning perimeter columns like they were walking in the park.
 
Last edited:
Myriad said:
All that drywall crushed and broken, you say? Wow, that must have made a lot of dust. Did anyone notice any dust?

(Bill: sometimes you need to read more than two or three posts back, to figure out which side to troll.)

Respectfully,
Myriad
Click to expand...

No, that's not what I said. I was replying to Phunk's assertion that there were a million ceiling tiles per building on the ground. Didn't you realise ?
 
bill smith said:
No, that's not what I said. I was replying to Phunk's assertion that there were a million ceiling tiles per building on the ground. Didn't you realise ?
Click to expand...

That was not my assertion. My post was in reply to the one immediately before it, which was about amount of drywall present in the buildings. I was merely mentioning another huge source of dust.
 
WTC Dust said:
I haven't given the evidence that it was found near the WTC, no.
Click to expand...

That evidence wouldn't be enough. You're speaking of evidence that you found the dust near the WTC site nine years after 9/11. I'm speaking of evidence that the dust was deposited there on that day.

Do you have any evidence of that?
 
WTC Dust said:
Yeah. The building collapsed at nearly free-fall speed, which means that almost 100% of the potential energy was converted into kinetic energy.

Where did all this energy come from to destroy the buildings?
Click to expand...

Gravity. (wow)

What is near free-fall speed? Like saying, the top speed for the 100 yard dash is 9 seconds, and you made it in 12.08 seconds, that you are nearly at world record speed; NOT!

Like saying I finished a trip in 9 hours and you took 12.08 hours, and you got there nearly the same time I did. NOT!

When you talk of being near free-fall, you need to be near free fall and not so far behind. You never present numbers or do the physics, you post nonsense.
 
bill smith said:
No, that's not what I said. I was replying to Phunk's assertion that there were a million ceiling tiles per building on the ground. Didn't you realise ?
Click to expand...


Yes, and you obviously don't realize (even after he's told you) that Phunk was following up on jaydeehess's post responding to triforcharity's post, pointing out the ample sources of dust.

But I'm glad you agree that drywall and ceiling tiles would be crushed and broken in that "meat grinder" which would generate a lot of dust.

Respectfully,
Myriad
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom