• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
WTC Dust said:
Oh really? Then you must be able to come up with some legitimate reason that NIST would hire a directed energy weapons manufacturer (ARA) to comment on a plane crash? There was no reason under the official story for ARA to have been contracted to advise on the NIST report.

However, if DEW were used or suspected to have been used, there would be.
They'd do things like make sure that nothing was said that would implicate DEW, like, "The building turned into dust while standing."

Which is what happened. And which implicates DEW.
Click to expand...

Yes really, what kind of energy was used? Delivery method? Steel turns to dust? Hardly, and earlier I saw you claim electricity, sory wrong answer, I was a welder for 8 years, never saw dust one time from steel. Seriously, all the steel turned to dust? Then what was the need for cranes at the clean up? All that would have been needed was a couple of brooms and dust pans.
Research Scientist? Hardly. Internet troll? Agreed.
 
djlunacee said:
Yes really, what kind of energy was used? Delivery method? Steel turns to dust? Hardly, and earlier I saw you claim electricity, sory wrong answer, I was a welder for 8 years, never saw dust one time from steel. Seriously, all the steel turned to dust? Then what was the need for cranes at the clean up? All that would have been needed was a couple of brooms and dust pans.
Research Scientist? Hardly. Internet troll? Agreed.
Click to expand...

Or hundreds of shop vacs.

The absence of shop vacs conclusively disproves the dustification of the towers.
 
WTC Dust said:
Oh really? Then you must be able to come up with some legitimate reason that NIST would hire a directed energy weapons manufacturer (ARA) to comment on a plane crash? There was no reason under the official story for ARA to have been contracted to advise on the NIST report.
Click to expand...

When you describe the NIST report on the collapse of WTC7, which truthers never tire of reminding us was never hit by a plane, as a "comment on a plane crash", that's sort of a barefaced, blatant lie, don't you think? Certainly more of a lie than describing Applied Research Associates, a company with a wide range of products in relevant fields like engineering, aerospace, computer modelling and security, as "a directed energy weapons manufacturer", which is clearly just a blatantly dishonest attempt to mislead.

Why is it that people who pretend to be interested in seeking the truth can barely frame a sentence without lying?

Dave
 
WTC Dust said:
If the WTC was destroyed by gravity alone, then the velocity of the building materials would have been straight down.

Gravity only works in the downward direction, not outward.

What I expected to see was a tall pile of steel centered on each of the footprints of WTC 1 and WTC 2. I expected some spread in the debris pile, but the center and highest point should have been right in the middle of the footprints.

That it wasn't disproves a gravity collapse. Nothing should have thrown the material horizontally.
Click to expand...

You've just proven that you don't understand basic physics. And you call yourself a scientist?

You a botanist or something? :confused:
 
"The Steel was turned to dust"



Absolutely not, thread ended.

"Things were laterally ejected!!!ONE!!! This could not have been gravity alone!!ONE"

In physics we make references to horizontal and vertical velocities. Horizontal velocities are independent of the vertical, and may be induced by impacting with other objects...

This thread needs to peter out if the only issues the OP can muster is Judy wood style beam dustification and laterally velocity....
 
tsig said:
Or hundreds of shop vacs.

The absence of shop vacs conclusively disproves the dustification of the towers.
Click to expand...

Swiffer would have gained billions upon billions of dollars in sales, then of course they would have been in on it also, and let's not forget Pledge, and Endust!!! Happy Birthday.
 
djlunacee said:
Swiffer would have gained billions upon billions of dollars in sales, then of course they would have been in on it also, and let's not forget Pledge, and Endust!!! Happy Birthday.
Click to expand...

Then the twoofers would have accused the big corporations of "cleaning up" on the deal.


(I'll get me coat)
 
Grizzly Bear said:
"The Steel was turned to dust"

[qimg]http://img200.imageshack.us/img200/9569/image276pf.jpg[/qimg]

Absolutely not, thread ended.

"Things were laterally ejected!!!ONE!!! This could not have been gravity alone!!ONE"

In physics we make references to horizontal and vertical velocities. Horizontal velocities are independent of the vertical, and may be induced by impacting with other objects...

This thread needs to peter out if the only issues the OP can muster is Judy wood style beam dustification and laterally velocity....
Click to expand...

What a joke. We are looking for ten MILES of core columns Grizzley. Not a few hundred feet. You just make it worse for yourselves with this kind of idiotic post.
 
WTC Dust said:
Well, I lived in NYC on 9/11, and I live there now. I live very close to the World Trade Center, so these attacks affected my life personally in a big way.

I kept expecting the fire to go out. I saw all the fire fighters working hard to put it out. I witnessed all the rain. Still, the remains fumed. Those fumes stunk to high heaven, unlike anything I've ever smelled before or since. I would recognize it if I ever smelled it again.
Click to expand...

Mmm okay? I accept your private reflections of what you experienced thereo-of. Now, concerning what I actually asked you about, care to reply on-point?
 
WTC Dust said:
What I expected to see was a tall pile of steel centered on each of the footprints of WTC 1 and WTC 2. I expected some spread in the debris pile, but the center and highest point should have been right in the middle of the footprints.
Click to expand...

Given that the center pile (as been shown to you by me before, which you continue to ignore) was almost as high as the lobby-exterior fasade that was standing (which was around 60-70 feet tall, and on the pile I am not even including the depth of the basement levels that the debris also collapsed into, extending 70 feet below ground level) I'd say your expectations were met and then some.

And yes, things fall downard, but if A clashed with B, A is experiences forced pressure just as it applies force on B as it goes downward, the B can affect parts of the A that hits it to divert it's path, either wholly, partly and all in between depending on the example's variables. It wouldn't mean that a building collapsing downard would likely not form a neat, stacked pile at the architectural footprint. And the WTC's intially collapsing portions didn't exactly have a clear path downard, so one would expect debris to get scattered around.
 
Last edited:
What a joke. We are looking for ten MILES of core columns Grizzley. Not a few hundred feet. You just make it worse for yourselves with this kind of idiotic post
Click to expand...
I must be doing something right to illicit this kind of response from a proponent of Judy Wood's theories
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom