• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
WTC Dust said:
Thank you for posting those pictures.

Is there still anyone out there who refuses to acknowledge that steel turned into dust on 9/11?
Click to expand...

I'm almost there. All I need is for you to support your case by telling us how your research has led to the conclusion that WTC turned mostly to dust.

Personally, I think you're a bald-faced liar when you tell us you're a research scientist. However, I'm willing to be proven wrong.

Can you prove me wrong? I really don't think so, but it should be entertaining to see you try.
 
tsig said:
Fine, now how do we destroy steel with electricity?
Click to expand...

With enough voltage, you can cause a large steel bus-bar to either vaporize or fly apart from raw electrostatics -- the process is so violent that it's hard to describe it in definite terms. However, as far as I know that kind of voltage does not exist except in theoretical stellar phenomena...
 
WTC Dust said:
Surely you aren't saying that you know of every single weapon ever devised, are you?

And if not, how do you know that something doesn't exist? You think secrets don't exist, either?
Click to expand...

Why would a great new weapon be a secret? We've had a couple of wars since then. Why are new weapons being kept on the sidelines?

The last few times the US military has come up with a great new weapon, they were eager to tell the whole world about it. They wanted EVERYONE to kinow "don't screw with us, or we'll uncork this nightmare on YOU."
 
R.Mackey said:
With enough voltage, you can cause a large steel bus-bar to either vaporize or fly apart from raw electrostatics -- the process is so violent that it's hard to describe it in definite terms. However, as far as I know that kind of voltage does not exist except in theoretical stellar phenomena...
Click to expand...

Given that lightning rods don't get vaporized when they're hit by lightning, we're looking at a pretty powerful energy source. One that could pretty much power the planet if it actually existed.
 
Last edited:
WTC Dust said:
There are at least two different kinds of dust with different chemical makeups. You can look in the literature already published for information on the dust. You don't need me.
Click to expand...

You have said that YOUR RESEARCH has led you to believe in "dustification".

Please tell us specifically what this research was and how it led you to this conclusion.

This is a SIMPLE REQUEST. Why can't you do it?

I have my suspicions, but I'd like to hear it from you.
 
Y'know I had something snarky to say, but it's highly unlikely, after all these posts, it hasn't been said several times.
 
R.Mackey said:
With enough voltage, you can cause a large steel bus-bar to either vaporize or fly apart from raw electrostatics -- the process is so violent that it's hard to describe it in definite terms. However, as far as I know that kind of voltage does not exist except in theoretical stellar phenomena...
Click to expand...

Shouldn't we expect the whole thing should have went in one instantaneous "poof" and not resemble anything like an actual collapse if this is what happened?
 
Justin39640 said:
Shouldn't we expect the whole thing should have went in one instantaneous "poof" and not resemble anything like an actual collapse if this is what happened?
Click to expand...

Given the amount of energy that would be required, there certainly would be a LOT more destruction than just the steel "dustifying". But let's not get caught up in the details!
 
R.Mackey said:
With enough voltage, you can cause a large steel bus-bar to either vaporize or fly apart from raw electrostatics -- the process is so violent that it's hard to describe it in definite terms. However, as far as I know that kind of voltage does not exist except in theoretical stellar phenomena...
Click to expand...

You've never worn the sweaters my late grandma used to give me.
 
excaza said:
Given the amount of energy that would be required, there certainly would be a LOT more destruction than just the steel "dustifying". But let's not get caught up in the details!
Click to expand...

Yeah. We'd also expect it to flash like the Flying Spaghetti Monster's own strobe light.

The energies we're talking about are not subtle, and would not be constrained to only dustalizing the steel. The result would easily destroy Manhattan no matter what technology was used.
 
Where there any cases of Siderosis or Siderosis Bulbi reported connected to exposure of the dust plume on 9/11? I couldn't find any WTC Dust. Doesn't that seem odd? I would have thought that much dustified iron raining down that day there would have been at least a few reported.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siderosis
 
Justin39640 said:
Wow
This has to be the worst case of not being very observant I have ever seen.

You really mean to tell me that THIS is the evidence of dustification????

Most(sane) people realize that seconds before a giant cloud of concrete, wallboard, etc, etc had come past and deposited A LOT OF DUST. When the spires fell, that dust became dislodged, and since steel has much less air resistance than dust, a spire shape cloud of dust was formed. DUH!

YOU CAN SEE THE *********** STEEL FALLING!

I am a lay person here but you are either (a)blind or (b)profoundly retarded.
Click to expand...

363814caf0db6534fb.gif


http://www.metacafe.com/watch/706490/9_11_james_fetzer_lying_eyes/
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom