• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
WTC Dust said:
You tell me.

The fumes were there. You can't deny this.

If you can explain it using a "plane crash" theory, I'd like to hear it.

One full year later: fumes.
Click to expand...

You realized he gave a perfectly good explanation in the post you quoted, right?
 
excaza said:
Analyzed how? An atom per day? Even if you were going that slow, you'd have SOMETHING by now. Even an incompetent scientist would have something in 9 years. Says a lot.
Click to expand...

You didn't see the picture I posted of my dust?
 
Your picture is not an analysis of the composition. My 6 month old cousin can take a picture.


You said you were a scientist?
 
Last edited:
tsig said:
She shows pictures and asks questions so she's Just Asking Questions.

You haven't got any samples have you?
Click to expand...

You didn't take a look at the picture I posted to this thread?
It shows my dust.
 
WTC Dust said:
Stay tuned.
Click to expand...

For what? In 9 years you have failed to analyze even a microgram of your "strange" dust in order to quantify exactly what is "strange" about it. 9 years. The most you've managed is a picture.

Analysis of a single sample takes minutes, at most.
 
Last edited:
WTC Dust said:
If I understood the question, I might be able to answer it.
Click to expand...

WTC Dust said:
See, most people who did not live in NYC consider 9/11 to be just that, 9/11/2001.
Click to expand...

I call ************.

WTC Dust said:
But no. I lived near the WTC site then, and I kept expecting the fire to go out, or what I thought was a fire at the time.

What kind of fire lasts through heavy rain? What kind of fire is impossible for fire fighters to put out, even when they work 24/7 on the job?

So it's not really just the dust that rolled down the street on 9/11 that I study. What I also study is the "fumes" that lasted for a year, emanating from the site.
Click to expand...

The kind of fire buried under many many tons of debris.

It's hard to put out a fire that you can't put water on.

A firefighter even invented a tool for this specific use.
http://firechief.com/mag/firefightin...chnology_cuts/

Wait through the ad.
 
A W Smith said:
I see what you did there :covereyes
Click to expand...

whistling.gif
 
WTC Dust said:
That might have worked as a theory about 9/11, except the upper floors of the WTC were not moving fast at the same time that incredible amounts of dust was being generated.
Click to expand...

Force = Mass X acceleration. With a great amount of mass, you don't need great speed.

Solid concrete? 30 years old concrete, just falling? It will create dust, but mostly chunks. Not dust, and certainly not dust/fumes that last a year.
Click to expand...

You're a research scientist. DEMONSTRATE how you came to this conclusion, or admit you're just making it up.
 
Originally Posted by WTC Dust
My research shows first of all THAT the WTC was turned largely into dust.

than your research, is a lie.
 
aggle-rithm said:
You'll pardon us here at this skeptics' forum if we don't take your word for it.

Tell us HOW your research shows that it was turned largely into dust.
Click to expand...

I'll wait until you agree THAT the WTC got turned into dust. I don't want to waste my time arguing HOW something happened until you agree that it did happen.

Plane huggers have a hard time with the dust. They can't explain it using a plane crash, so they deny it or call it "gypsum and wall board".

Doesn't explain the steel beams that were standing tall, 1368 feet into the sky, that suddenly, precipitously lost their strength. I say they dissolved into dust, but whatever you say must account for this loss of strength.

Do you think jet fuel/office fires did it? Seems like a ridiculous story to me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom