• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
bill smith said:
What about the 'shipping the steel to China' business ? A childish attempt to persuade people that the noticably missing steel had already been removed. They even had to ignore the normal bounds of respect for the dead and common decency to try that one on.
Click to expand...

APPLAUSE

Somebody (other than me) figured that out. Yay!
 
Hey WTC Dust,

Care to address my post and not ignore it? Re: Fighting a fire underneath tons of rubble?
 
WTC Dust said:
My research shows first of all THAT the WTC was turned largely into dust.
I'm not arguing HOW at this moment. That's Dr. Wood's job.

My samples are great. They show what the building became, and it isn't all gypsum and concrete. There's metallic dust, too.
Click to expand...


She shows pictures and asks questions so she's Just Asking Questions.

You haven't got any samples have you?
 
WTC Dust said:
Why did the steel beams of the WTC fail? This seems to me to be the unanswered question from the "plane crash" theorists. I realize the "bombs in the building" theorists say it was thermite bombs, but that isn't me. I know it wasn't thermite.
Click to expand...

What beams?

You mean the trusses?
 
WTC Dust said:
Why did the steel beams of the WTC fail? This seems to me to be the unanswered question from the "plane crash" theorists. I realize the "bombs in the building" theorists say it was thermite bombs, but that isn't me. I know it wasn't thermite.
Click to expand...

Read the NIST report. The answers to your questions are all there. I understand that it is probably too long, boring, and technical for you, but if you wish to relieve your extreme ignorance, that would be a good place to start.

http://wtc.nist.gov/
 
beachnut said:
Wow, you fall for the nonsense of WTC dust, and Judy, and you can look up what WTC dust can't. Now you can take 180 mph and 580 mph and see why the impact of Flight 175 was 11 times more KE than the design. Don't let WTC dust know you are not really a truther, you are just a poster of bombast and delusional claptrap when it comes to 911.

Why can't you understand 911? You can do simple tasks, and that is all it takes to refute Judy and WTC dust. Why have you failed?
Click to expand...

The equation for kinetic energy doesn't apply when a building is completely stationary before it gets destroyed, as was the case with the WTC buildings.
 
Jono said:
Now you're referring to both the foot-columns and the rest of the building's core columns that went all the way up, surely?
The piles covered a large area and large heights as well (at the footprint, where the piles were notably high), and we saw a tall portion of South Towers core collapse a short while after the floors had collapsed around it, so we know it went down too (where else did it go ya think?).

And we have close up pictures of core columns in the piles. Personally, after having seen hundreds of pictures of the steel in those piles, I can't readily determine where every single piece went originally. So this brings me to the unevitable question, what's your point?
Click to expand...

The core columns were really, really tall.

What happened to them?
 
Thunder said:
there is a piece of WTC steel at the Staten Island Botanical Garden.

how come it was not turned into dust?

two of the tritons from the WTC towers will be part of the Memorial museum.

how come they were not turned to dust?

the 9-11 steel cross, is still on display a block north from GZ.

how come it was not turned to dust?

there is still damage from 9-11, on the building just south and on the west side, of the WTC. this building is along the West Side Highway.

this damage could not have been caused by dust. it was caused by a solid object.

how come this solid object was not turned to dust?
Click to expand...

Pointing to the remaining steel isn't the same thing as accounting for the missing steel.

That some steel remained does not rule out that some steel was turned into dust.
 
I think we all have to learn to accept the fact, that WTC Dust has won. He is right, as to the collapse of the WTC.

Why do I say this? Because he has stated a very correct and true statement.

The fact is, that yes, there is no way that a plane crash alone, can cause a 110 story steel structure to collapse.

:)
 
WTC Dust said:
Why did the steel beams of the WTC fail? This seems to me to be the unanswered question from the "plane crash" theorists. I realize the "bombs in the building" theorists say it was thermite bombs, but that isn't me. I know it wasn't thermite.
Click to expand...

It was fire.

My research points to this.
 
Grizzly Bear said:
Maybe the steel vaporized in somebody's dream...
Click to expand...

Nope. Vaporization is the process of a liquid becoming a gas.

Dust is not gas. Dust is very fine particulate matter, but it's much larger than the molecules of a gas.

To talk about vaporization is to talk about excess heat, when people standing right next to the World Trade Centers actually survived the collapse without burns.

No process that required excess heat could have destroyed the WTC. The survivors will tell you that they are, in fact, alive.
 
Captain_Swoop said:
Building demoition and sitre clearance raise dust clouds all the timethe site is being worked. Sodoes a construction site, quarry etc. Lots of large vehicles driving around tends to raise dust. That's why you will see them spraying the ground to try and keep the dust down.

Why would your 'DWW' cause 'fumes' for nearly a year after it was used?

What was the source of these year long 'fumes'
Click to expand...

You tell me.

The fumes were there. You can't deny this.

If you can explain it using a "plane crash" theory, I'd like to hear it.

One full year later: fumes.
 
WTC Dust said:
Nope. Vaporization is the process of a liquid becoming a gas.

Dust is not gas. Dust is very fine particulate matter, but it's much larger than the molecules of a gas.

To talk about vaporization is to talk about excess heat, when people standing right next to the World Trade Centers actually survived the collapse without burns.

No process that required excess heat could have destroyed the WTC. The survivors will tell you that they are, in fact, alive.
Click to expand...

Under what conditions can dustification occur?
 
WTC Dust said:
My samples are being analyzed, but not by being "sent" to anyone. I haven't shared them with anyone.
Click to expand...

Analyzed how? An atom per day? Even if you were going that slow, you'd have SOMETHING by now. Even an incompetent scientist would have something in 9 years. Says a lot.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom